Geoecological classification of lands by categories of value for the habitat of Artiodactyla: experience with the application of GIS technologies

Keywords: the habitats of Аrtiodactyla, geoecological assessment, geographic information systems (GIS), Аrtiodactyla, habitat assessment, forest management plans, forest taxonomy, life on land, national nature park, Ukraine

Abstract

Introduction. The inventory and classification of lands according to the categories of habitat value of various species is an important stage in the arrangement of the territory and the planning and carrying out of further research and environmental protection measures. The land quality assessment is in line with the 15th Sustainable Development Goal, which aims to conserve, restore and sustainably use terrestrial ecosystems, manage forests and conserve biodiversity. There is currently no approved methodology for assessing the suitability of protected areas for habitation of species. Quality of living conditions is the basis for assessing the optimal number of hunting species in forestry and hunting enterprises. This methodology was adapted for the use of GIS (QGIS) as the main tool that provides processing of significant data sets, simplifies and speeds up the routine part of the study and allows you to visualize the results for further analysis. The aim of this article is to develop an approach to classifying lands by categories of value for habitation of Аrtiodactyla using GIS.

Materials and methods. The approbation and step-by-step description of the developed approach is presented in the article on the example of assessing the territory of the Slobozhanskyi National Nature Park (Parkhomivka Environmental research department) for the habitat of the European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus Linnaeus, 1758) as a model species of Аrtiodactyla. To classify the lands of the Slobozhanskyi National Nature Park (SNNP), the descriptions of the Park forestry subcompartments and compartments were used as the main source of data. These materials contain information about all forestry subcompartments: their areas, characteristics of forest stands, undergrowth, and additional information.The value of each forest subcompartmentswas determined in accordance with the “Procedure for the Arrangement of Hunting Lands” depending on protective and forage properties. Types of natural complexes have different values for different animals – their own quality class (bonitet).

Presentation of the main material. The basis was the vector layer of forestry subcompartments of the SNNP. For each subcompartment of the Parkhomivka Environmental research department the class of bonitet was determined based on the characteristics of the forest stands. All data was entered into the corresponding column of the attribute table. In the QGIS software package, the vector layer of subcompartments bonitet was converted into a raster using the “Rasterization” tool. To calculate the average quality class for compartments based on smallest units (subcompartments), the “Zonal Statistics” tool was used. This made it possible to take into consideration the different shapes and sizes of forest plots.

Conclusion. The conducted study illustrates the possibilities of applying landscape-geographic methods and relevant criteria for assessing the potential of landscapes of the SNNP in accordance with the geoecological needs for game species of mammals, in our case for European roe deer. The algorithm presented in the article for assessing the value of lands for the habitat of Аrtiodactyla based on forest management materials can be applied to various territories, including protected areas of Ukraine. It is essentially a geoecological assessment of lands that are inhabited or potentially inhabited by a certain species through an assessment of the suitability of conditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Yuliia Serzhantova, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

Senior Lecturer, Department of Physical Geography and Cartography

Nataliia Brusentsova, Kuialnytskyi National Nature Park; Slobozhanskyi National Nature Park

PhD (Biology), Senior Researcher

Oksana Zaliubovska, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

PhD (Geography), Associate Professor, Department of Physical Geography and Cartography

References

Bodnia O., Sinna O., Oliynikov I., & Ovcharenko A. (2016). Landscape mapping of the Slobozhanskyi National Park using mobile, desktop and web applications ArcGIS. Problems of continuous geographic education and cartography: Collection of scientific papers. Kharkiv: V.N. Karazin KhNU, 23, 15-21 [in Ukrainian].

Brusentsova N. O., Serzhantova Y. Yu. (2024). Suitability of the deciduous forest of the Slobozhanskyi National Park (Kharkiv region, Ukraine) for the habitat of moose (Alces alces). International scientific and practical conference dedicated to the 40th anniversary of the Roztochchya Nature Reserve. "Protected territories of Ukraine: modern challenges and development prospects" (40-43). Lviv: SPOLOM [in Ukrainian].

Danilov D. M. (1960). Hunting grounds. Kyiv: “Forest industry” [in Ukrainian].

Zaliubovskaya Oksana, Ovcharenko Alina, & Chervanyov Ihor (2023). Landscape studies: from paradigm through GIS technology to monitoring (on the example of the territory of the Slobozhanskyi National Nature Reserve). Bulletin of the V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, series “Geology. Geography. Ecology”, (59), 110-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26565/2410-7360-2023-59-09

Kuzyakin V. A. (1979). Hunting taxation. Kyiv: “Forest industry” [in Ukrainian].

Martynov E., Masaitys V., & Gorokhovnikov A. (2014). Hunting. Hunting science, hunting economy. Textbook. Kyiv: Lan [in Ukrainian].

Bondarenko V.D., Delegan I.V., & Tatarinov K.A. (1993). Hunting science. Kyiv: NMK VO [in Ukrainian].

Guidelines for the arrangement of hunting grounds (2002). Kyiv: State Committee for Forestry and Fisheries of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].

Naumov A. I. (1902 (1903)). Flora of the vicinity of the village of Rublivka, Bogodukhiv district. Proceedings of the Kharkiv Society of Nature Researchers at Kharkiv University, 37, 51-150 [in Ukrainian].

Nagretsky L. N. et al. (1977). Organization and technique of hunting. Kyiv: "Forest Industry" [in Ukrainian].

Petrichenko V. V., Lebedeva N. I., & Kartashova Ya. M. (2009). Typology of hunting grounds: Textbook. Zaporizhzhia: ZNU [in Ukrainian].

On approval of the Procedure for conducting forest management. Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine dated 02/07/2023 No.112 (2003) (Ukraina). Official Gazette of Ukraine, 20, 14 [in Ukrainian].

On approval of the Procedure for conducting forest management. Order of the State Forestry Committee of Ukraine dated 06/21/2001 No. 56 (2001). Official Gazette of Ukraine, 36, 311 [in Ukrainian].

Law On the Nature Reserve Fund of Ukraine. Law of Ukraine dated 16/06/1992 No. 2456-XII (1992). Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 34, Article 502. [in Ukrainian].

Vasenko O. G. & others. (2015). The Project for the organization of the territory of the national natural park “Slobozhansky”, protection, restoration and recreational use of its natural complexes and objects. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].

Klimov O. V., Filatova O. V., Nadtochii H. S. & others. (2009). The project of creation of the national park “Slobozhanskyi”. Kharkiv: UkrNDI of Environmental Problems [in Ukrainian].

M.P. Rudyshyn & others (1987). Rational management of hunting (K.A. Malinovsky, Red). Lviv: Kamenyar [in Ukrainian].

Ryzhak I. V., Chaskovsky O. G. (2003). Remote methods for inventorying fauna biotopes (on the example of the Roztochchya nature reserve). Scientific Bulletin, 13, 47-51 [in Ukrainian].

Rizun E. M. (2019). Qualitative assessment of living conditions for the European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.) in the forest-steppe (right-bank) forestry zone of Ukraine. Theriologia Ucrainica, 18, 74–79 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://10.15407/pts2019.18.074

Stoyko S., Kovalchuk I., & Kopiy L. (2007). Treasury of knowledge about the Ukrainian forest: Ukrainian encyclopedia of forestry. (S. A. Gensiruk, Red). Lviv [in Ukrainian].

Tokarskyi V.A. (2003). Rare and endangered mammals of protected areas of the Kharkiv region. Scientific research on the territories of the nature reserve fund of the Kharkiv region (75-81). Kharkiv: Collection of scientific articles [in Ukrainian].

O.M. Marynich and others (2007). Physical and geographical zoning - 1:2500,000/ National Atlas of Ukraine. Kyiv: DNVP “Cartography” [in Ukrainian].

Chaskovskyi O., Andreychuk Yu., & Yamelinets T. (2021). Application of GIS in environmental protection on the example of the open program QGIS: teaching aids. Lviv: LNU named after Ivan Franko, Publishing House Prostir-M [in Ukrainian].

Sheygas I. M. (2021). Characteristics of the action of limiting factors on the state of the hunting resource of Ukraine. Theriologia Ukrainica, 21, 141-151 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/TU2113

Sheygas, I. M. (2005). Types of hunting grounds that provide maximum fodder and protective conditions for the habitat of wild phytophagous animals in the conditions of the Southern Steppe of Ukraine. Scientific Bulletin of UkrDLTU, 15, 102–107 [in Ukrainian].

Brazaitis G. and others (2014). Landscape effect for the Cervidaes Cervidae in human-dominated fragmented forests. European Journal of Forest Research, 133, 857-869. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-014-0802-x

QGIS Geographic Information System. QGIS Association. URL: http://www.qgis.org (accessed 01.03.2025)

Published
2025-06-01
Cited
How to Cite
Serzhantova, Y., Brusentsova, N., & Zaliubovska, O. (2025). Geoecological classification of lands by categories of value for the habitat of Artiodactyla: experience with the application of GIS technologies. Visnyk of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series Geology. Geography. Ecology, (62), 337-346. https://doi.org/10.26565/2410-7360-2025-62-25