Migration of tritium in the components of the natural environment

Keywords: tritium, forms of tritium detection, natural environment, atmospheric geomigration, biogeomigration, hydrogeomigration

Abstract

Formulation of the problem. Tritium formed as a result of natural or man-made processes is included in migration flows depending on the forms of its presence – gaseous (NT), aqueous (NTO) and organically bound (OZT). According to these forms, tritium is redistributed among various components of the natural environment and distributed in the environment according to the laws of the hydrogen cycle in nature.

Materials and methods. During atmospheric transport, the tritium concentration decreases according to the laws of diffusion in air plumes. Part of tritium with atmospheric precipitation falls on the surface of water bodies, where it is diluted to background concentrations, on vegetation and soil. The further geochemical history of these precipitations is determined by the laws of biogeochemical and hydrogeochemical migration and inclusion in the short-term and long-term cycles in the biosphere.

Results. According to the results of monitoring the content of tritium in the snow cover and in atmospheric moisture in the zone of influence of radioactive waste preservation (SFRW) projects, it was determined that the formation of atmogeochemical anomalies of tritium depends on the constructive features of the confinement, geomorphological and landscape-geochemical factors (relief forms, type and structure of the forest ecosystem) , the presence of technological premises, which play the role of natural and man-made barriers in the way of the movement of air masses, as well as from the wind rose generalized for the control period. Biogeochemical migration of tritium occurs with water from atmospheric precipitation in the soil-plant system. Tritium, like a hydrogen isotope, participates in all processes of biogeomigration, which is primarily determined by the biological role of water and organic matter. The main biophysical processes determining the biogeomigration of tritium include: initial deposition on the surface of the soil and vegetation, conversion of tritiated hydrogen (HT) into tritiated water (HTO) in the soil due to bacterial oxidation, absorption of HTO by plants with the conversion of a part of HTO into an organically bound form (OZT), transportation of HTO in soil and absorption of HTO by roots, re-emission of HTO into the atmosphere from soil and plants. Hydrogeochemical migration of tritium in surface reservoirs and watercourses causes its dilution to background concentrations. Yes, in discharges from the nuclear power plants of Ukraine in Dnipro (Kakhovsky Reservoir), Horyn, Styr, P. Bug on the weekend, downstream of the tritium concentrations exceed 20÷50 Bq×dm–3.

Conclusions. According to the results of radio-hydrogeological monitoring of the territories adjacent to the SFRW, the main factors influencing the formation of tritium hydrogeofiltration flows in the geological environment were determined. These include: the intensity of the release of tritiated water from RAW storage facilities, hydraulic permeability, hydrophysical parameters and the mineral composition of the zone of unsaturated filtration, the topography of the surface of the water-resistant horizon and seasonal fluctuations in the amount of atmospheric precipitation to the local aquifer. The long-term operation of tritium hydrogeofiltration flows in the system "aeration zone (ZA) – underground aquifer (SAW)" causes their spread to a distance that significantly exceeds the planned dimensions of the containers and the territory of the SFRW.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Oleksandr Pushkarov, SE “Institute of Environmental Geochemistry of the NAS of Ukraine”

DSc (Geology), Senior Researcher, Leading Researcher

Iryna Sevruk, SE “Institute of Environmental Geochemistry of the NAS of Ukraine”

PhD (Geology), Senior Researcher, Deputy Director

Ivan Shramenko, SE “Institute of Environmental Geochemistry of the NAS of Ukraine”

PhD (Geology and Mineralogy), Senior Researcher, Leading Researcher

Oleksandr Zubko, SE “Institute of Environmental Geochemistry of the NAS of Ukraine”

Researcher

Volodymyr Viter, SE “Institute of Environmental Geochemistry of the NAS of Ukraine”

PhD (Chemical), Head of the laboratory

References

Harteck, P. (1954). The relative abundance of HT and HTO in the atmosphere. Journal of Chemical Physics, 22, 1746–1751.

Jacobs, D. G. (1968). Sources of tritium and its behavior upon release to the environment (AEC Critical Review Series). Oak Ridge, TN: USAEC. https://doi.org/10.2172/4799828

Burger, L. L. (1976). Conversion of tritiated hydrogen to water in the atmosphere (BNWL-2113). Richland, WA: Pacific Northwest Laboratories. https://doi.org/10.2172/7330458

Delaporte-Mathurin, R., Goles, N., Ball, J., Dunn, C., Edwards, E., Ferry, S., Lamere, E., Lanzrath, A., Leccacorvi, R., Meschini, S., Peterson, E., Segantin, S., Vieira, R., Whyte, D., Zhou, W., & Woller, K. (2024). Advancing tritium self-sufficiency in fusion power plants: Insights from the BABY experiment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.02721. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.02721

Yang, J. Y., & Gevantman, L. R. (1964). Tritium β-radiation-induced isotopic exchange with water vapor. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 68(11), 3115–3119. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100793a005

McFarlane, J. C., Rodgers, R. D., & Bradley, D. V. Jr. (1978). Environmental tritium oxidation in surface soil. Environmental Science & Technology, 12(5), 590–593. https://doi.org/10.1021/es60141a003

World Health Organization. (1983). Environmental health criteria 25: Selected radionuclides – Tritium. Geneva: WHO. Retrieved from https://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc25.htm

International Atomic Energy Agency. (2001). Generic models for use in assessing the impact of discharges of radioactive substances to the environment (Safety Reports Series No. 19). Vienna: IAEA. Retrieved from https://www.iaea.org/publications/6024/generic-models-for-use-in-assessing-the-impact-of-discharges-of-radioactive-substances-to-the-environment

Chakin, V., Rolli, R., Gaisin, R., & van Renterghem, W. (2023). Tritium desorption behavior and microstructure evolution of beryllium irradiated at low temperature up to high neutron dose in BR2 reactor. Journal of Nuclear Engineering, 4(3), 552–564. https://doi.org/10.3390/jne4030036

Matiatos, I., Tsangaratos, P., Copia, L., & Araguás-Araguás, L. (2025). Revisiting the historical tritium levels in precipitation in Greece—Preliminary assessment of groundwater transit times. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2025.107619

Beyerle, U., Aeschbach-Hertig, W., Hofer, M., et al. (1999). Infiltration of river water to a shallow aquifer investigated with 3H/3He, noble gases and CFCs. Journal of Hydrology, 220(3–4), 169–185.

Chaparro, M. C., & Saaltink, M. W. (2022). Tritium transport in non-saturated concrete under temperature fluctuations. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 251–252, 106969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2022.106969

Glugla, M., Murdoch, D. K., Antipenkov, A., et al. (2006). ITER fuel cycle R&D: Consequences for the design. Fusion Engineering and Design, 81(1–4), 733–744.

Pasquill, F. (1962). Atmospheric diffusion: The dispersion of windborne material from industrial and other sources. London: Van Nostrand.

Pushkarev, O. V., Pushkareva, R. O., Yakovlev, E. O., Koltunov, B. G., & Pryimachenko, V. M. (2004). Atmogeomigration of tritium from radioactive waste storage facilities and its distribution in the soil-plant complex. Mineral Resources of Ukraine, (1), 39–41. [in Ukrainian]

Dolin, V. V., Pushkarev, O. V., Shramenko, I. F., et al. (2012). Tritium in the biosphere. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka. [in Ukrainian]

Butler, H. L. (1963). Tritium hazards in heavy-water-moderated reactors. Nuclear Safety, 4(3), 77–82.

Mattle, N., Kinzelbach, W., et al. (2001). Exploring an aquifer system by integrating hydraulic, hydrogeologic and environmental tracer data in a three-dimensional hydrodynamic transport model. Journal of Hydrology, 242(3–4), 183–196.

International Atomic Energy Agency. (2014). Transfer of tritium in the environment after accidental releases from nuclear facilities (IAEA-TECDOC-1738). Vienna: IAEA.

Pasler, V., Arbeiter, F., Klein, C., Klimenko, D., & Schlindwein, G. (2021). Development of a component-level hydrogen transport model with OpenFOAM and application to tritium transport inside a DEMO HCPB breeder. Applied Sciences, 11(8), 3481. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11083481

National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. (1979). Tritium in the environment (NCRP Report No. 62). Bethesda, MD: NCRP.

Östlund, H. G., & Fine, R. A. (1979). Oceanic distribution and transport of tritium. In Behavior of Tritium in the Environment (pp. 314–324). Vienna: IAEA.

Oms, P. E., Bailly Du Bois, P., Dumas, F., et al. (2019). Inventory and distribution of tritium in the oceans in 2016. Science of the Total Environment, 656, 1289–1303.

Sejkora, K. (2006). Atmospheric sources of tritium and potential implication to surface and groundwater monitoring efforts. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual RETS-REMP Workshop (pp. 26–28). Mashantucket, CT.

Chamberlain, A. C., & Eggleton, A. E. J. (1964). Washout of tritiated water vapour by rain. International Journal of Air and Water Pollution, 8, 135–149.

Ebina, T., Rwaichi, J. A., Minja, I., Nagase, T., Onodera, Y., & Chatterjee, A. (2004). Correlation of hydraulic conductivity of clay–sand compacted specimens with clay properties. Applied Clay Science, 26, 3–12.

Davis, P. A. (1997). Tritium transfer parameters for the winter environment. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 36(2–3), 177–196.

Vasylchenko, V. M., Davydov, M. M., Masko, O. M., & Chernov, P. A. (2013). Monitoring of tritium in natural surface waters of Ukraine. Nuclear Energy and Environment, (1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.31717/2311-8253 [in Ukrainian]

Han, K. W., Heinonen, J., & Bonne, A. (1997). Radioactive waste disposal: Global experience and challenges. IAEA Bulletin, 39(1), 33–41.

Gudelis, A., & Gorina, I. (2015). On release of radionuclides from a near-surface radioactive waste repository to the environment. Nukleonika, 60(3), 551–555.

Peters, C. A., Striegl, R. G., Mills, P. C., & Healy, R. W. (1992). Effects of low-level radioactive-waste disposal on water chemistry in the unsaturated zone at a site near Sheffield, Illinois, 1982–84 (U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper). Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey.

LLW Repository Ltd. (2010). Review of leachate, groundwater and surface water monitoring (RP/DR-GEN/PROJ/00035, 2).

ANDRA. (2009). Centre de stockage de la Manche: Rapport annuel 2008.

Ormai, P. (2009, September 22–25). Surveillance of non-radiological parameters: Planning of the post-closure surveillance programme. In IAEA/ANDRA International Workshop on Post-operational Environmental Monitoring and Surveillance of Disposal Facilities for Radioactive Waste, Cherbourg, France. Retrieved from https://www.iaea.org/OurWork/ST/NE/NEFW/WTS-Networks/DISPONET/disponetfiles/IntlWkp_Post_op%20Env_Monitoring_Surv_DispFac_RW_Cherbourg_FR2009/Surv_non-rad_parameters-PURAM.pdf

BAPA. (2009). Report on the implementation of the control program for ionizing radiation facilities of national significance at the “Radons” radioactive waste repository in 2008. Riga, Latvia: BAPA. [in Latvian]

Vagner, I., Varlam, C., Faurescu, I., Faurescu, D., & Bogdan, D. (2024). Tritium behavior from vine to wine. Applied Sciences, 14(13), 5478. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135478

Pushkarev, O. V., Yakovlev, E. O., Pushkareva, R. O., Koltunov, B. G., & Letuchy, O. M. (2003). Hydrogeomigration of tritium in the locations of radioactive waste storage facilities. Mineral Resources of Ukraine, (2), 38–40. [in Ukrainian]

Kovalenko, G. D. (2013). Radioecology of Ukraine. Kharkiv: ID "Inzhek".

Published
2025-06-01
Cited
How to Cite
Pushkarov, O., Sevruk, I., Shramenko, I., Zubko, O., & Viter, V. (2025). Migration of tritium in the components of the natural environment. Visnyk of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series Geology. Geography. Ecology, (62), 112-126. https://doi.org/10.26565/2410-7360-2025-62-09