Ecosystem degradation in Kharkiv region during the war: satellite analysis
Abstract
Problems Statement and Purpose. The article investigates the degradation of ecosystems in the Kharkiv region due to military actions, specifically in Kupiansk and Izyum districts. The destruction of plant cover and natural landscapes, exacerbated by fires and other war-related damages, poses long-term ecological challenges. The purpose of the study is to assess these impacts through satellite monitoring using the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) to identify the most affected areas and plan for their ecological restoration.
Materials and Methods of Research. The research utilizes satellite images from the Copernicus Sentinel-2 platform to analyze changes in NDVI values between 2021 and 2024. This methodology allows for the detection of vegetation degradation in the studied areas and employs Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to map and visualize the extent of environmental damage. NDVI indices are analyzed for variations over time, providing insights into the effects of military actions on the region's vegetation.
Results. The results of the study indicate a dramatic reduction in NDVI values in the Kupiansk and Izyum districts, particularly in 2022, which coincided with the height of military activities in the region. NDVI values in 2022 showed a 48% decrease compared to 2021, reflecting the extensive loss of vegetation due to forest fires, bombings, and the movement of heavy military equipment, which caused both direct destruction and secondary effects such as soil compaction and erosion. In 2024, some recovery in NDVI values was observed, but these remained significantly lower than pre-war levels, indicating that full ecological recovery has not yet been achieved. The study further identified key ecological hotspots where vegetation loss was most severe, particularly in areas close to conflict zones, such as military bases and frontlines. The analysis showed that forested areas suffered the greatest damage, with significant portions of these ecosystems either destroyed or severely degraded. The GIS-based analysis also revealed a correlation between the intensity of military actions and the degree of vegetation loss, with the most severely affected areas being those that experienced sustained bombardment and heavy combat. The data suggest that the recovery of these areas will require substantial effort, including reforestation, soil remediation, and the implementation of erosion control measures to prevent further degradation.
Conclusions. 1). The war has led to significant environmental damage in the Kharkiv region, with substantial loss of vegetation cover and ecosystem services. 2). The NDVI analysis highlights the most affected areas, showing both the immediate and lingering effects of war on plant cover. 3). Continued monitoring and a comprehensive ecological restoration strategy are necessary to restore the region's natural landscapes, with reforestation and soil recovery being critical components. This study provides a crucial foundation for further research on the ecological impacts of warfare and offers practical recommendations for the restoration of war-torn ecosystems in Ukraine. The findings can be applied to other conflict-affected regions, emphasizing the need for a proactive approach to environmental recovery in post-war scenarios.
Downloads
References
Patsev, I.S.; Barabash, O.V.; Patseva, I.G. (2023) Impact of military actions on forest ecosystems of Zhytomyr region. Scientific and Practical Journal ‘Ecological Sciences’, 5(50). 114-118. https://doi.org/10.32846/2306-9716/2023.eco.5-50.16 [in Ukrainian]
Skakun V. Chynchyk, A., Strakhov, A. (2023) Economic approaches to assessing the environmental consequences of the war in Ukraine. Improve Construction Efficiency, 2(50). 266–280. https://doi.org/10.32347/2707-501x.2022.50(2).266-280 [in Ukrainian]
Khrushch, O., Moskalets, V., Fedyk, O., Karpiuk, Y., Hasiuk, M., Ivantsev, N., Ivantsev, L., & Arjjumend, H. (2023). Environmental and Psychological Effects of Russian War in Ukraine. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources. 6, 1 (April 2023), 37-84. https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.060103
Sobol, S. (2023). The influence of the russian invasion on the territory of ukraine on the environmental and general social situation. World-Ger Conference proceedings, 1(gec28-01). 58–60 https://doi.org/10.30890/2709-1783.2023-28-01-010
Hnedina, K., Nahornyi, P. (2022). Threatsto ecological safety: realities of wartime and economic stimulation of post-war ecological restoration of Ukraine. Problems and prospects of economics and management, (4 (32). 39–52. https://doi.org/10.25140/2411-5215-2022-4(32)-39-52 [in Ukrainian]
Gardashuk, T. (2022). Environmental Threats of War in Ukraine. Envigogika, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.14712/18023061.639
Latysheva, O., Rovenska, V., Smirnova, I., Mikheev, O. (2022). Research of Social and Ecological Losses from the War in Ukraine. Economic Herald of the Donbas, 2 (68). 199–205 https://doi.org/10.12958/1817-3772-2022-2(68)-199-205 [in Ukrainian]
Brankov, T., Puškarić, A. (2023). Armed conflict in ukraine: food security and environmental implications. Ekonomika poljoprivrede, 70(3). https://doi.org/10.59267/ekopolj2303773b
Kapelista, I., Korniyenko, G., Skliar, V., Voitsitska, K., & Derman, V. (2023). The Impact of the Russian-Ukrainian War on Global Food and Environmental Security. WSEAS transactions on environment and development, 19. P. 808-819 https://doi.org/10.37394/232015.2023.19.76
Krainiuk O. V., Buts Y. V., Didenko N. V., Barbashyn V. V. (2023). Ecological Consequences of Environmental Pollution with Heavy Metals as a Result of the War in Ukraine. // European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. 17th International Conference Monitoring of Geological Processes and Ecological Condition of the Environment, Nov. 2023, 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.2023520013
Buts Y.V., Krainiuk O.V., Lotsman P.I., Senchikhin Y.M. (2022). Post-pyrogenic transformation of biogeochemical properties of grey forest soils under anthropogenic load Bulletin of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University and V.N. Karazin Moscow State University, Series «Ecology», 27. 63-71. https://doi.org/10.26565/1992-4259-2022-27-05 [in Ukrainian]
Buts Yuriy, Krainiuk Olena (2023). Technogenic and ecological aspects of pyrogenic impact on the environment. International security studios: managerial, economic, technical, legal, environmental, informative and psychological aspects. International collective monograph. Georgian Aviation University. Tbilisi, Georgia. 238-259. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7825520, ISSN 1512-4916, http://www.ndekc.lviv.ua/pdf/267.pdf
Buts Y.V., Krainiuk O.V., Senchikhin Y.M., Barbashyn V.V., Trishina O.O. (2023) The impact of dangerous toxic factors of fires during military operations on ecosystems and human activity. Municipal Economy of Cities. Scientific and technical collection. Series: Technical sciences and architecture, 6, 180. 196-202. https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2023-6-180-196-201 [in Ukrainian]
Maurer, P. (2021). Protecting the Natural Environment in Armed Conflict. Environmental Policy and Law. 51, 1-2, 21-24. https://doi.org/10.3233/EPL-219003
Loets A. (2020). Protection of the Environment in Times of Armed Conflict: In Search of a New Legal Perspective. Leiden Journal of International Law, 8, 7-40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156500003083.
Sokolova, N. (2021). International Environmental Protection in Armed Conflicts: Traditional Legal Regulation and Interpretation Novelties. Lex Russica, 74(12). 84-95 https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2021.181.12.084-095. [in Ukrainian]
Skakun, V., Chynchyk, A., & Strakhov, A. (2023). Economic approaches to assessing the environmental consequences of the war in Ukraine. Ways to Improve Construction Efficiency, 2(50), 266–280. https://doi.org/10.32347/2707-501x.2022.50(2).266-280.
Paranjak, R., Gutyj, B., Lytvyn, N., Didorenko, Y. (2023). Problems of environmental protection as an aspect of military confrontation. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies. Series: Agricultural Sciences, 25(98), 200-207. https://doi.org/10.32718/nvlvet-a9832.
Blahopoluchna, A., Liakhovska, N., & Parakhnenko, V. (2022). Environmental and economic damage from the full-scale military invasion of russia in Ukraine. Economies' Horizons. https://doi.org/10.31499/2616-5236.3(21).2022.263572
Padányi, J., & Földi, L. (2023). The Effects of Armed Conflicts on the Environment. Contemporary military challenges/sodobni vojaški izzivi, 25, 37-52. https://doi.org/10.2478/cmc-2023-0004
Makarenko, N., Strokal, V., Berezhniak, Y., Bondar, V., Pavliuk, S., Vagaliuk, L., Naumovska, O., Ladyka, M., & Kovpak, A. (2022). The war consequences on natural resources of Ukraine: analyses and methodologies. Naukovì Dopovìdì Nacìonalʹnogo Unìversitetu Bìoresursiv ì Prirodokoristuvannâ Ukraïni. https://doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi2022.04.003
Nahorna, N. (2023). The impact of hostilities on the conservation areas of Donetsk region. Physical Geography and Geomorphology. https://doi.org/10.17721/phgg.2023.1-6.05
Trofymchuk, O., Vishnyakov, V., Sheviakina, N., Klymenko, V., Zahorodnia, S. (2023). Detection of surface soil disturbance areas as a result of military actions in Ukraine by remote sensing methods. sgem International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference. EXPO Proceedings, 23(2.1). https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2023/2.1/s08.20
Nalitov. D. Environmental devastation from war: problems that will be solved for generations, 2024 https://www.pravda.com.ua/columns/2024/09/26/7476908/ [in Ukrainian]
Skakun, S., Justice, C., Kussul, N., Shelestov, A., Lavreniuk, M. (2019). Satellite Data Reveal Cropland Losses in South-Eastern Ukraine Under Military Conflict. Frontiers in Earth Science, 7, 305. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00305.
Ulytsky, O., Yermakov, V., Buglak, O., Lunova, O. (2018). Risk of man-made and ecological disasters at the filter stations in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions. Journal of Geology, Geography and Geoecology, 27(1), 138-147. https://doi.org/10.15421/111839.
Bildirici, M., & Gokmenoglu, S. (2020). The impact of terrorism and FDI on environmental pollution: Evidence from Afghanistan, Iraq, Nigeria, Pakistan, Philippines, Syria, Somalia, Thailand and Yemen. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 81, 106340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106340.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
