Fog and low-level stratus characteristics at the airport of Odesa from surface observations
Abstract
Introduction. Fog that limits visibility and low-level stratus represent a significant hazard to aviation especially during takeoff and landing, and also low-level flying of aircrafts, because accidents often occur in reduced visibility conditions and low clouds. Therefore, forecasting fog and low ceilings is one of the most important, but at the same time the most difficult issue, because both phenomena strongly depend on local conditions and unsteady in both time and space.
The aim of the study is to obtain the statistical characteristics of low-level stratus and fog at the airport of Odessa and determine local dependencies that would enable to improve aviation weather forecasts related to low-level stratus and fog physics.
Scientific novelty of results obtained. In this study for the Ukraine for the first time for Odesa airport frequency distribution of low-level stratus and fogs is obtained as a function of the time of the day and the month of the year and also as a function of the temperature and relative humidity near the surface.
Practical importance of results obtained. The results obtained could be used for providing weather forecast model with historical data and improving forecast of fogs and low-level stratus.
Materials and method. To study fog and low-level stratus characteristics occurring at the airport of Odesa, Ukraine, half hourly observations in the period of 2010-2021 are used. Applying a statistical approach annual, seasonal and diurnal distribution of fog and low stratus and their frequency distribution associated with various meteorological parameters are obtained.
Results and discussion. The monthly distributions of low-level stratus reveal maximum occurrence frequencies in November and January, and fog most frequently occurs in December. No significant diurnal cycle of stratiform cloud occurrence is discovered, as opposed to fog for which the highest frequency is observed in the hours before sunrise, while when the day sets in, frequencies are declining and increasing at night. Fog and low-level stratus have the same distribution in duration and the mean event duration is 4.5 h while 55% of the events lasted 2 h or less. The most long-lived fog and stratiform clouds can last about 4 days during the December-January period. Occurrence of fog and stratiform clouds as function of temperature and relative humidity reveals a close statistical relationship, especially for fog events. More than 33% of all fogs are observed at temperatures of 0°C to 6°C and 96-100% relative humidity, the most frequencies of low-level clouds (13%) occur in the same temperature interval, but at lower values of relative humidity (91‑95%). Regarding fog density 75% of the events have minimum visibility lower than 400 m, which indicates the severity of the problem, because, despite the season and type of fog, they are usually quite intense and dense. In all seasons of the year, the highest frequency of low-level stratiform clouds is in interval of 3...4 m/s, excluding summer, when most often such cloud is registered at higher speeds. The wind directions associated with low-level stratiform clouds are, as a rule, northern and eastern ones. Fogs, on the contrary, most often in all seasons, except winter, are formed at calm, meaning that radiation fogs are the most common type in the Odesa airport. In winter fogs are most commonly associated with northern and easterly winds; in all other seasons the southern wind is the most frequent.
Downloads
References
Alaoui, B., Bari, D., Bergot, T., & Ghabbar, Y. (2022). Analog Ensemble Forecasting System for Low-Visibility Conditions over the Main Airports of Morocco. Atmosphere, 13(10), 1704. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13101704
Andrew J., Fultz & Walker S. Ashley (2016). Fatal weather-related general aviation accidents in the United States, Physical Geography, 37:5, 291-312, https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.2016.1211854
Bari, D., Bergot, T., & Tardif, R. (2023). Fog Decision Support Systems: A Review of the Current Perspectives. Atmosphere, 14(8), 1314. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14081314
Bergot, T., Terradellas, E., Cuxart, J., Mira, A., Liechti, O., Mueller, M. and Nielsen, N.W. (2007). Intercomparison of single-column numerical models for the prediction of radiation fog. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 46(4), 504–521. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2475.1
Burrows, W. R., & Toth, G. (2011). Automated fog and stratus forecasts from the Canadian RDPS operational NWP model (p. 33). Extended Abstracts, 24th Conference on Weather and Forecasting, 23–27 January, 2011, Seattle, WA. American Meteor Society, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4852.0648
Cermak, J.; Bendix, J. (2007). Dynamical Nighttime Fog/Low Stratus Detection Based on Meteosat SEVIRI Data: A Feasibility Study. Pure appl. geophys. 164, 1179–1192. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8419-7_5
Chachere, C.N. and Pu, Z. (2019). Numerical simulations of an inversion fog event in the Salt Lake Valley during the MATERHORN-fog field campaign. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 176(5), 2139–2164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-018-1770-8
Cotton, W. R., and R. A. Anthes, (1989). Storm and cloud dynamics. Academic press, Inc, New York.
Dupont, JC., Haeffelin, M., Protat, A. et al. (2012). Stratus–Fog Formation and Dissipation: A 6-Day Case Study. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 143, 207–225 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-012-9699-4
Elias, T., M. Haeffelin, P. Drobinski, L. Gomes, J. Rangognio, T. Bergot, P. Chazette, J. C. Raut, and M. Colomb (2009). Particulate contribution to extinction of visible radiation: pollution, haze, and fog. Atmos Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.01.006
Glickman, T., Ed. (2000). Glossary of Meteorology. 2nd ed. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 855. http://glossary.ametsoc.org/ . (Accessed on 22.10.2023).
Gultepe, I., Agelin-Chaab, M., Komar, J., Elfstrom, G., Boudala, F., & Zhou, B. (2019). A meteorological supersite for aviation and cold weather applications. Pure Applied Geophysics 176, 1977–2015/ https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-018-1880-3
Gultepe, I., Pearson, G., Milbrandt, J. A., Hansen, B., Platnick, S., Taylor, P., Gordon, M., Oakley, J. P., and Cober, S. G. (2009). The Fog Remote Sensing and Modelling Field Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 90, 341–360. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008BAMS2354.1
Gultepe, I., Sharman, R., Williams, P.D. et al. (2019). A Review of High Impact Weather for Aviation Meteorology. Pure Appl. Geophys. 176, 1869–1921. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-019-02168-6
Gultepe, I., Tardif, R., Michaelides, S., Cermak, J., Bott, A., Bendix, J., Muller, M.D., Pagowski, M., Hansen, B., Ellrod, G., Jacobs, W., Toth, G. and Cober, S.G. (2007). Fog research: a review of past achievements and future perspectives. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 164(6-7), 1121–1159.
Henry, A. J., (1930). Aviation Weather Hazards. Mon. Wea. Rev., 58, 231-234.
Humphreys, W. J. (1930). Meteorology and its importance to aviation. Monthly Weather Review, 58, 196–197. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1930)58%3C196:MAIITA%3E2.0.CO;2
Jacobs, A. J., & Maat, N. (2005). Numerical guidance methods for 3301 decision support in aviation meteorological forecasting. Weather 3302 Forecasting, 20, 82–100. https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-827.1
Koglbauer, I. V., Seidl, M., Braunstingl, R., Riesel, M., & Baciu, C. (2023). The Role of Simulator Scenarios in Learning Low Visibility Procedures in Flight. In I. Albulescu, & C. Stan (Eds.), Education, Reflection, Development – ERD 2022, 6. European Proceedings of Educational Sciences (271-279). European Publisher. https://doi.org/10.15405/epes.23056.25
Kulkarni, R., Jenamani, R.K., Pithani, P., Konwar, M., Nigam, N. and Ghude, S.D. (2019). Loss to aviation economy due to winter fog in New Delhi during the winter of 2011–2016. Atmosphere, 10(4), 198. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10040198
Lakra K, Avishek K. (2022). A review on factors influencing fog formation, classification, forecasting, detection and impacts. Rend Lincei Sci Fis Nat;33 (2):319-353. Epub 2022 Mar 14. PMID: 35309246; PMCID: PMC8918085. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-022-01060-1
Matveev, L.T. (1984). Statistical Data of Clouds and Cloud Behavior. In: Cloud Dynamics. Atmospheric Sciences Library, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6360-3_9
National Transportation Safety Board (2005). Risk Factors Associated with Weather-Related General Aviation Accidents. Safety Study NTSB/SS-05/01. Washington, DC.
Niu, S., C. Lu, H. Yu, L. Zhao, J. Lu (2010). Fog research in China: an overview. Adv Atmos Sci, 27(3), 639 – 662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-009-8174-8
NTSB Review of Low Ceiling/Visibility Accidents. July 2022. https://ral.ucar.edu/sites/default/files/docs/1-eick-low-cig-vis-abreviated_0.pdf
Ounda, K., V. Ongoma, (2015). Fog and low level stratus forecasting using satelliteproducts; A case study of Jomo Kenyatta International Airport, KenyaPakistan, J. Meteorol. 11 (2015), 49-56.
Petersen, S., (1956). Weather Analysis and Forecasting, Vol. 1 and 2. McGraw-Hill, New York, Toronto, London.
Pithani, P., Ghude, S.D., Prabhakaran, T., Karipot, A., Hazra, A., Kulkarni, R., Chowdhuri, S., Resmi, E., Konwar, M., Murugavel, P., Safai P., Chate D., Tiwari Y., Jenamani R. and Rajeevan M. (2019). WRF model sensitivity to choice of PBL and microphysics parameterization for an advection fog event at Barkachha, rural site in the Indo-Gangetic Basin, India. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 136(3-4), 1099–1113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-018-2530-5
Ribaud, J.-F., Haeffelin, M., Dupont, J.-C., Drouin, M.-A., Toledo, F., and Kotthaus, S. (2021). PARAFOG v2.0: a near-real-time decision tool to support nowcasting fog formation events at local scales, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 7893–7907, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7893-2021.
Román Cascón, C., Yagüe, C., Sastre, M., Maqueda, G., Salamanca, F. and Viana Jiménez, S. (2012). Observations and WRF simulations of fog events at the Spanish Northern Plateau. Advances in Science and Research, 8, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-8-11-2012
Roquelaure, S. and Bergot, T. (2009). Contributions from a Local Ensemble Prediction System (LEPS) for improving fog and low cloud forecasts at airports. Weather and Forecasting, 24(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008WAF2222124.1
Stolaki, S., Pytharoulis, I. and Karacostas, T. (2012). A study of fog characteristics using a coupled WRF–COBEL model over Thessaloniki airport, Greece. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 169(5-6), 961–981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-011-0393-0
Tardif, R., and R. M. Rasmussen, (2007). Event-based climatology and typology of fog in the New York City region. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol. 46, 1141–1168. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2516.1
Warren, S. G., R. Eastman, and C. J. Hahn, (2007). A survey of changes in cloud cover and cloud types over land from surface observations, 1971–1996. J. Climate, 20, 717–738, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4031.1
Westerhuis S., O. Fuhrer, J. Cermak, W. Eugster, (2020). Identifying the key challenges for fog and low stratus forecasting in complex terrain Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 146 (732) (2020), 3347-3367. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3849
Willett, (1928). Fog and haze, their causes, distribution and forecasting. Mon. Wea. Rev., 56, 435-468. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1928)56<435:FAHTCD>2.0.CO;2
WMO (World Meteorological Organization), International Cloud Atlas. https://cloudatlas.wmo.int/en/home.html. Accessed 15 Jan 2022.
World Meteorological Organization (WMO), 1992: International Meteorological Vocabulary, WMO 182, 782.
Zhou, B., & Du, J. (2010). Fog Prediction from a Multimodel Mesoscale Ensemble Prediction System. Weather and Forecasting, 25(1), 303-322. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009WAF2222289.1
Archived Metar Observations. http://rp5.ua/ Access date 11/12/22.
Ivus G.P., Semerhei-Chumachenko A.B. (2007). Aviation meteorology and climatology: Lecture notes. Odessa., 201.
Order on the approval of flight rules of aviation in the airspace of Ukraine “Meteorological services for civil aviation” dated 05 June 2017. for N 1092/30960.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.