Assessment of groundwater vulnerability within the cross-border areas of Ukraine and Poland

Keywords: groundwater vulnerability, transboundary aquifer, main aquifer, Polish-Ukrainian cross-border area


Problem statement. The growing global trend of groundwater consumption and excessive groundwater abstraction in many parts of the world requires an accurate and comprehensive assessment of the potential for groundwater resource development. The EU-WATERRES international project has begun developing a concept for coordinated management and harmonized monitoring of groundwater resources in the transboundary areas of Ukraine and Poland. Studying groundwater's natural protection status or vulnerability is a priority, as groundwater pollution has become a significant environmental problem in recent decades due to the growth of industrial production and agricultural activities.

Study objective is to analyze the existing materials on the natural protection of groundwater within the study area and to quantify the vulnerability of the main useful aquifer (MUA) to surface pollution in the cross-border Polish-Ukrainian area.

Methodology involves the quantitative method of groundwater vulnerability assessment by calculating the time of pollutant penetration into the aquifer through the aeration zone using the modified Bindemann formula and GIS.

Research results. Studies have shown that the most vulnerable among MUA there is an unconfined alluvial Quaternary horizon (alQ) of the Syan and Dniester River basins. Throughout its entire development, its vulnerability corresponds to the "very high" category because of pollution from the surface caused by precipitation filtration. The Upper Cretaceous aquifer (K2) is less vulnerable. The groundwater of this horizon in the Polish part of the cross-border area is more vulnerable - here the vulnerability corresponds to the categories "very high" and "high". In the Ukrainian part, the Upper Cretaceous aquifer is characterized by better natural hydrogeological conditions and is less vulnerable to pollution. The Lower Neogene aquifer, which has a limited distribution on the slopes of the Western Bug-Syan River watershed within Roztochia, is the least vulnerable to pollution as compared to the others. The lithological composition of the aeration zone and the thickness of weakly permeable and practically impermeable rocks have a decisive impact on the filtration time and vulnerability of groundwater to pollutants from the surface by infiltration.

Scientific novelty of the research. For the first time, a quantitative assessment of the vulnerability of the MUAs for the Polish-Ukrainian cross-border area was carried out. The use of the results of this assessment will facilitate the adoption of appropriate management decisions for the comprehensive protection of transboundary groundwater, prevention of its pollution, and reduction of anthropogenic impact.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Halyna Medvid, Institute of Geology and Geochemistry of Combustible Minerals of NAS of Ukraine

PhD (Geology), Head of the Laboratory of Geoecology Problems

Luibov Yanush, Subsidiary Enterprise of PJSC NJSC Nadra Ukrayny Zahidukrgeologiya

MSc (Geology), Leading Engineer

Tatiana Solovey, Polish Geological Institute - National Research Institute

DSc (Geography), Associate Professor

Dmytro Panov, Subsidiary Enterprise of PJSC NJSC Nadra Ukrayny Zahidukrgeologiya

MSc (Geology), Head of the Geology and Production Department

Vasyl Harasymchuk, Institute of Geology and Geochemistry of Combustible Minerals of NAS of Ukraine

PhD (Geology), Senior Researcher


Voloshyn, P. (2012). Assessment of natural protection and vulnerability of groundwater in Lviv from anthropogenic pollution. Visnyk of Lviv University, Series Geography. 40 (1), 149–155. Available at: [in Ukrainian].

Goldberg V.M. (1987). Relationship between groundwater pollution and the natural environment. L. Gidromete-oizdat, 248 p. [in Russian].

Davybida L., Podholov, V. (2019). Geoinformation assessment of the groundwater contamination risk in Chernihiv region. Ecological Safety and Balanced Use of Resources, 1(19), 59–68. [in Ukrainian].

Iemchuk T.V. (2011). Assessment of groundwater protection: methodological aspects and practical application. – Hydrology, hydrochemistry and hydroecology. The scientific collection / Editor-in-chief V.K. Khilchevskiy. 1(22), 45–50. Available at: [in Ukraini-an]

Koshliakov O.E., Dyniak О.V., Koshliakova I.E. (2015). Natural security (vulnerability) of groundwater used for drinking water supply in Kiev. Odesa National University Herald. Geography and Geology, 19(3(22), 269–275. [in Ukrainian]

Levoniuk S.M., Udalov I.V. (2018). Complex geo-ecological assessment of the protection of drinking groundwater. Odesa National University Annals. Geography and Geology, 23(2), 33, 111–133. [in Ukrainian].

Panov D.H., Harasymchuk V.Y., Solovey T.V., Yanush L.O., Sokorenko S.M., Pavliuk N.M. (2021). Assessment of groundwater resources in the transboundary area between Ukraine and Poland within the framework of the pro-ject "EU-WATERRES: European Integrated Management System for Transboundary Groundwater Resources and Anthropogenic Hazards" // Subsoil Use in Ukraine. Investment prospects. Proceedings of the Seventh International Scientific and Practical Conference (2021, Lviv). State Commission of Ukraine on Mineral Resources (SCR) - Kyiv: SCR - 2, 299-305. Available at: [in Ukrainian].

Sanina I.V., Lyuta N.H. (2013). Experience in regional assessments of water protection of the first aquifer from the surface using GIS technologies. Modern problems of geology: Collection of scientific papers, dedicated to the 155th anniversary of Pavlo Apolonovych Tutkovsky, May 15-17, 2013. Kyiv, Fiton, 309-311. [in Ukrainian].

Tkachuk V.G., Rosenberg G.F., Kalashnik V.K. (1986). Map of natural protection of groundwaters in Ukrainian SSR. Scale 1:200 000. Lviv Region. Kiev, 52 [in Russian].

Shestopalov V.M., Boguslavsky A.S., Bublyas V.N. (2007). Assessment of protection and vulnerability of groundwa-ter, taking into account the zones of rapid migration. Kiev, 120. [in Russian].

Abdullah, T., Ali, S., Al-Ansari, N. and Knutsson, S. (2016). Groundwater Vulnerability Using DRASTIC and COP Models: Case Study of Halabja Saidsadiq Basin, Iraq. Engineering, 8, 741-760.

Aller, L., Bennett, T., Lehr, J.H., Petty, R.H., and Hackett, G. (1987). DRASTIC: A Standardized System for Evaluat-ing Groundwater Pollution Potential Using Hydrogeologic Setting. USEPA Report 600/2-87/035, Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory, Ada, 252.

Burchi S. (2018). Legal frameworks for the governance of international transboundary aquifers: Pre- and post-ISARM experience. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 20, 15-20.

Fannakh A., Farsang A., (2022). DRASTIC, GOD, and SI approaches for assessing groundwater vulnerability to pollution: a review. Envi-ron Sci Eur 34, 77 (2022).

IGRAC, 2015. Transboundary Aquifers of the World Map 2015. Available at:

Kozłowski, M., Sojka, M. (2019). Applying a Modified DRASTIC Model to Assess Groundwater Vulnerability to Pollution: A Case Study in Central Poland. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 28(3), 1223-1231.

Liszkowska E. (2017). Nieprawidłowości przy ocenie czasu przesączania zanieczyszczeń przez strefę aeracji na podstawie formuł obliczeniowych stosowanych w praktyce hydrogeologicznej. Przegląd Geologiczny, 65, (11/1), 1109–1114. Available at: [in Polish].

Macioszczyk T. (1999). Czas przesączania pionowego wody jako wskaźnik stopnia ekranowania warstw wodonośnych. Przegląd Geologiczny, 47(8), 731–736. Available at: [in Polish].

Ouedraogo I., Defourny P., Vanclooster M. (2016). Mapping the groundwater vulnerability for pollution at the pan-African scale. Science of The Total Environment, 544, 939-953.

Potrykus D., Gumuła-Kawęcka A., Jaworska-Szulc B., Pruszkowska-Caceres M. And Szymkiewicz A. (2018). As-sessing groundwater vulnerability to pollution in the Puck region (denudation moraine upland) using vertical seepage method. E3S Web Conf. Volume 44, 2018/ 10th Conference on Interdisciplinary Problems in Environmen-tal Protection and Engineering EKO-DOK 2018. 00147, 8.

Ravindranath, I., & Thirukumaran, V. (2021). Spatial mapping for Groundwater Vulnerability to Pollution Risk Assessment Using DRASTIC Model in Ponnaiyar River Basin, South India. Journal of Geology, Geography and Geoecology, 30(2), 355-364.

Solovey T., Harasymchuk V., Janica R., Przychodzka M., Ryvak T., Teleguz O., Yanush L.. (2022). Hydrogeological Conceptual Model of Transboundary Aquifers with Significant Groundwater Exchange Potential Between Poland and Ukraine. UNESCO, Paris 07 SP, France, 148–158. Available at:

Wada Y. and Heinrich L. (2013). Assessment of transboundary aquifers of the world—vulnerability arising from human water use. Environmental Research Letters, 8, (2024003), 13.

Witczak S.& Żurek A. (1994). Wykorzystanie map glebowo-rolniczych w ocenie ochronnej roli gleb dla wód podziemnych [W:] Kleczkowski A.S. (red.) Metodyczne podstawy ochrony wód podziemnych, AGH: 155-180.

How to Cite
Medvid, H., Yanush, L., Solovey, T., Panov, D., & Harasymchuk, V. (2023). Assessment of groundwater vulnerability within the cross-border areas of Ukraine and Poland. Visnyk of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series "Geology. Geography. Ecology", (58), 73-84.