Technological features of distribution between river basins using GIS technologies (based on the example of r. Brusnytsya)
Abstract
Formulation of the problem. The catchment area and surface runoff volume – morphometric parameters calculated from digital terrain models – are widely used in geographic information analysis of the area. They are attributed to the block of hydrological parameters, where they are basic concepts.
The emergence and widespread usage of GIS tools has greatly simplified this labor-intensive process. However, the complexity of the applied algorithms forms the sensitivity of the models to the entered parameters, the values of most of which are selected by the user through numerous attempts and tests.
The research methodology. The study examines the most common GIS tools from many existing ones that support hydrology tools – ArcGIS, Global Mapper, SAGA GIS, Surfer. Finding out the principles of operation of hydrological tools in different GIS environments and the applied algorithms was one of the goals, the solution of which was revealed in the process of research methodology. The same set of initial data obtained as a result of vectorization of relief elements of a fragment of a topographic map of the research territory is used for all software. The digital terrain model was prepared taking into account the requirements and features of hydrologically correct models. The initial data were checked for topological correctness. In order to determine the influence of separate DEM on the results of the boundaries, its modeling was performed in three versions – 10 × 10 m; 25 × 25 m; 50 × 50 m. According to the same algorithm in each of the GIS tools, the boundaries of the basins were selected. The obtained map metrics were entered into comparative tables, and in some cases were subject to correlation analysis.
As a result of studies. The correct location and accurate plotting of the catchment areas of water bodies on the cartographic material has a decisive influence on the accuracy of determining their areas.
No direct relationship was found between the effect of the DEM resolution on the results of modeling the boundaries of catchment areas.
However, the resolution of the DEM affects the detail of the hydrographic network. It is established that for the same parameter ( ), there is a linear relationship between the cell size and the total length of the river network within the studied basins. Despite the study of hydrological modeling algorithms used in GIS tools, the most difficult is the special sensitivity of the models to the entered parameters.
A correlation (very high level of connection) has been established, which consists in reducing the length and number of selected objects of watercourses with increasing the threshold value of the amount of runoff ( ).
The scientific novelty. The obtained results are aimed at increasing the accuracy of modeling the boundaries of catchment basins and calculating the derived hydrographic parameters. They can be used to generalize hydrographic network objects within dedicated catchments and to achieve a reasonable degree of cartographic compliance and detail depending on the objectives and scope of research.
The practical significance. Thus, both the resolution of the DEM and the value of the runoff threshold have a direct impact on the derived hydrographic parameters (for example, the density of the river network).
Downloads
References
Krasokha A. (2018). Uriad zatverdyv Natsionalnu infrastrukturu heoprostorovykh danykh [The government ap-proved a national geospatial data infrastructure]. Retrived from: www.unn.com.ua/uk/news/1710130-uryad-zatverdiv-natsionalnu-infrastrukturu-geoprostorovikh-danikh. [in Ukrainian].
Zakon Ukrainy Pro natsionalnu infrastrukturu heoprostorovykh danykh : vid 13 kvitnia 2020 r. № 554-IX [About the national infrastructure of geospatial data]. (2020, April 13). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, p. 277 [in Ukrainian].
Ovcharenko I. V. (2017). V Ukraini zaprovadzhuietsia kadastr poverkhnevykh vodnykh obiektiv [A cadastre of sur-face water bodies is being introduced in Ukraine]. Retrived from: www.kmu.gov.ua/news/irina-ovcharenko-v-ukrayini-zaprovadzhuyetsya-kadastr-poverhnevih-vodnih-obyektiv.
Hrebin V. V., Mokin V. B., Stashuk V. A. ta in. (2013). Metodyka hidrohrafichnoho ta vodohospodarskoho raionuvannia terytorii Ukrainy vidpovidno do vymoh Vodnoi Ramkovoi Dyrektyvy Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu [Meth-odology of hydrographic and water management zoning of the territory of Ukraine in accordance with the re-quirements of the Water Framework Directive of the European Union]. – Kyiv: Interpres LTD [in Ukrainian].
Vodna Ramkova Dyrektyva YeS 2000/60/IeS. Osnovni terminy ta yikh vyznachennia [The EU Water Framework Directive 2000/60 / EU. Basic terms and their definitions]. – Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Karpinskyi Yu. O., Liashchenko A. A. (2000). Orohrafichno-trianhuliatsiina tsyfrova model reliefu [Orographic-triangulation digital relief model]. Visnyk heodezii ta kartohrafii, 3, 28–33 [in Ukrainian].
Chervanov I. H., Kostrikov S. V., Vorobiov B. N. (2006). Fliuvialni heomorfosystemy: doslidzhennia y rozrobky Kharkivskoi heomorfolohichnoi shkoly [Fluvial geomorphosystems: research and development of Kharkiv geo-morphological school] – Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Burshtynska Kh. V. (2003) Teoretychni ta metodolohichni osnovy tsyfrovoho modeliuvannia reliefu za fotohram-metrychnymy ta kartometrychnymy danymy [Theoretical and methodological bases of digital terrain modeling for photogrammetric and cartometric data]. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. Lviv : «Lvivska politekhnika» [in Ukrainian].
Shevchuk S. A., Vyshnevskyi V. I., Babii P. O. (2014). Utochnennia hidrohrafichnykh kharakterystyk richok z vy-korystanniam metodiv DZZ [Establishment of hydrographic characteristics of the river using remote sensing meth-ods]. Visnyk heodezii ta kartohrafii, 5 (92) [in Ukrainian].
Svidzinska D. V. (2014). Otsinka prydatnosti tsyfrovykh modelei vysot SRTM ta ASTER dlia tsilei hidrolohichnoho heoprostorovoho analizu [SRTM and ASTER Digital Elevation Models suitability assessment for the purposes of hydrological geospatial analysis]. Mizhrehionalnyi zbirnyk naukovykh prats «Problemy bezperervnoi heohrafich-noi osvity i kartohrafii», 19 [in Ukrainian].
Khilchevskyi V. K., Grebin’ V. V. (2017). Hidrohrafichne ta vodohospodarske raionuvannia Ukrainy 2016 r. – real-izatsiia polozhen VRD YeS [Hydrographic and hydroeconomic zoning of Ukraine’s territory, approved in 2016 – implementation of the WFD provisions]. Hidrolohiia, hidrokhimiiai hidroekolohiia, 1 (44) [in Ukrainian].
Hlotka D. V. (2014). Udoskonalennia karty hidrohrafichnoho raionuvannia terytorii Ukrainy na osnovi SRTM HydroSHEDS [Improvement of the map of hydrographic zoning of the territory of Ukraine on the basis of SRTM HydroSHEDS]. Fizychna heohrafiia ta heomorfolohiia, 3 [in Ukrainian].
Borovytska A. H. (2016). Pravove rehuliuvannia vedennia derzhavnoho vodnoho kadastru Ukrainy [Legal regula-tion of maintenance of the state water cadastre of Ukraine]. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. Kharkiv, Na-tional University of Law [in Ukrainian].
Bilia I. K. (2018). Analiz heoportalu «Vodni resursy Ukrainy» (na prykladi Chernivetskoi oblasti) [The analysis of the geoportal Water Resources of Ukraine (for example, Chernovtsy region)]. Chasopys kartohrafii, 18 [in Ukrainian].
Sait Derzhavnoho vodnoho kadastru: oblik poverkhnevykh vodnykh obiektiv [The water cadastre: counting of surface water objects]. geoportal.davr.gov.ua. Retrived from: http://geoportal.davr.gov.ua:81. [in Ukrainian].
Shvets H. I., Drozd N. I., Levchenko S. P (1957). Kataloh richok Ukrainy [The catalog of rivers of Ukraine]. Kyiv, AN URSR [in Ukrainian].
Topohrafycheskye karty: M–35–XXXII Chernovtsy (1970). [Topographic maps of Chernovtsy M-35-XXXII]. Mos-cow, Heneralnyi shtab [in Russian].
Iakovchenko S. H. (2007). Sozdanye heoynformatsyonnыkh system v ynzhenernoi hydrolohyy [Creation of geo-graphic information systems in engineering hydrology]. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. Barnaul : Institute of Water and Environmental Problems, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences [in Russian].
Piankov S. V., Kalynyn V. H. (2015). Opredelenye optymalnykh parametrov rastrovoi modely pry raschete hydrohrafycheskykh kharakterystyk vodnykh objektov [Determination of optimal parameters of raster models in calculating the hydrographic characteristics of water bodies]. Proceedings of the International conference “In-terCarto. InterGIS», 21 [in Russian].
Zhang M., Xue Y., Ge. Y., Zhao J. (2020). Watershed Segmentation Algorithm Based on Luv Color Space Region Merging for Extracting Slope Hazard Boundaries. International Journal of Geo-Information, 9. Retrived from: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9040246.
Osnovni polozhennia stvorennia ta onovlennia topohrafichnykh kart masshtabiv 1:10 000, 1:25 000, 1:50 000, 1:100 000, 1:200 000, 1:500 000, 1 000 000 / Zatv. Nakazom Hol. upr. heodezii, kartohrafii ta kadastru Ukrainy № 156 vid 31.12.99 r [in Ukrainian].
Chepelkynaia L. A. (1986). Rukovodstvo po opredelenyiu hydrohrafycheskykh kharakterystyk kartometrycheskym sposobom [The Guidelines for the determination of hydrographic characteristics by cartometric method]. Lenynhrad: Hydrometyzdat [in Russian].
