Fires in ecosystems and influence on the atmosphere
Abstract
Introduction. Fires in ecosystems, mostly after open burning, affect Ukrainian territory each year causing flora and fauna damage, soil degradation, pollutants emission, which impact air quality and human health. Fires influence the atmosphere by adding burned products and its further direct and indirect effects. Despite majority of fires are open burning, research of forest fire emissions prevail among Ukrainian scientists. Therefore, the study aimed to analyze the influence of all-type fires in Ukrainian ecosystems on substances fluxes to the atmosphere and possible changes of meteorological processes.
Data and methodology. The study uses GFED4 data and inventories for analyses of forest and agricultural burned fraction, carbon and dry matter emissions for the period of 1997–2016. Additional data includes absorbed aerosol index derived from OMI (Aura) instrument and ground-based meteorological measurements.
Results. Burning fraction indicates the 10 to 30% of area influencing in case of active fires. More than 90% of fires in Ukrainian ecosystems happened on the agricultural lands. The highest trends of active fires appear on the western and northern part of Ukraine, whereas burned fraction on the central territories reached up to 60% decreasing per decade. Most fires happened during two periods: March – April and July – September. The most severe fires occurred in 1999, 2001, 2005, 2007, 2008 and 2012.
Average emissions in Ukraine vary from 0.2 to 1.0 g·m2·month-1 for carbon and from 0.001 to 0.003 kg·m2·month-1 for dry matter. There are three localizations of huge burning products emissions, where maximal average values reach 1.8 g·m2·month-1 for carbon and 0.005 kg·m2·month-1 for dry matter. The biggest one occurred in the Polissia forest region. Despite the maximal emission from forest fires, open burning results the biggest coverage and air quality deteriorating.
Absorbing aerosol index (AAI) could be good indicator of fires in Ukrainian ecosystems and burning products emissions. Overall, AAI with values more than 0.2 correspond to dry matter emissions of 0.005–0.01 kg·m2·month-1. If AAI exceed 0.4 usual dry matter emissions exceed 0.02 kg·m2·month-1.
The study finds local scale changes of air temperature and days with precipitation due to huge burning products emissions. In case of monthly average AAI exceed 1.2 during fires events, positive air temperature anomaly at the ground decrease from 0.7 to 0.1°C. The main reason is absorption of solar radiation in the atmosphere. During the next month after intensive fires in ecosystems, days with precipitation have twofold decrease: from 13-14 to 7 days with precipitation more than 0 mm, and from 2-3 to 1 day with precipitation more than 5 mm. The reason might be changes of cloudiness formation due to elevated concentrations of carbonaceous aerosols. The results obtained for atmospheric changes is planned to be verified and compared using online integrated atmospheric modelling.
Downloads
References
Fires statistics. State Emergency Service of Ukraine. Available at: https://undicz.dsns.gov.ua/ua/Statistika.html
Balabukh, V. O., Zibtsev, S. V. (2016). Impact of climate change on quantity and area of forest fires in the northern part of the Black Sea Region of Ukraine. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Journal, (18), 60-71. [https://doi.org/10.31481/uhmj.18.2016.07]
Balabukh V., Malytska L. Impact of climate change on natural fire danger in Ukraine. Idojaras. 2017. 4(121): 453-477.
Gumeniuk, V., Golyaka, D., Zibtsev, S. (2015). Ground Fire Effects on Pine Stands of Central Polissya of Ukraine. Scientific Bulletin of UNFU, 25(9), 41-49. [https://doi.org/10.15421/40250907]
Brown J.K., Smith J. K. (2000). Wildland fire in ecosystems: effects of fire on flora. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep., (2), 257.
Nasi R., Dennis R., Meijaard E., Applegate G., Moore P. (2002). Forest Fire and Biological Diversity. Unasylva, 53(209), 36-40.
Malinovskaya I.M. (2012). An influence of fire upon the soil microbiocoenosis state of lea lands of not enough and long standing. Bulletin of Poltava State Agrarian Academy, (1), 20-24. [https://doi.org/10.31210/visnyk2012.01.05]
Neary D.G., Ryan K.C.; De Bano L.F. (2008). Wildland fire in ecosystems: effects of fire on soils and water. Gen. Tech. Rep., (4), 250.
Andreae M.O., Merlet P. (2001). Emissions of trace gases and aerosol from biomass burning. Global Biogeochem. Cy., (15), 955–966.
van der Werf G.R., Randerson J.T., Giglio L., Collatz G.J., Kasibhatla P.S., Arellano, A.F. Jr. (2006). Interannual variability in global biomass burning emissions from 1997 to 2004. Atmos. Chem. Phys., (6), 3423–3441.
Report on wildfire monitoring. UHMI of SESU and NASU. Available at: https://uhmi.org.ua/msg/fire2020/
Whang, Y., Khalizov, A., Levy, M., Zhang, R. (2013). New Directions: Light absorbing aerosols and their atmos-pheric impacts. Atmospheric Environment, (81), 713-715.
Galytska E., Danylevsky V., Snizhko S. (2016) Aerosols dynamics in the atmosphere over Eastern Europe by means of AERONET according to weather conditions during summer 2010. Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Journal, (17): 5-16.
Galytska E., Danylevsky V., Hommel R., Burrows J.P. (2018) Increased Aerosol Content in the Atmosphere over Ukraine During Summer 2010. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, (11), 2101-2118. [https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-2101-2018]
Mahura A., Nuterman R., Nerobelov G., Sedeeva M., Smyshlyaev S., Savenets M., Pysarenko L., Krakovska S., Ivanov S., Michaelides S., Ruban I., Sassi A.S., Makkonen R., Baklanov A., Petaja T., Zilitinkevich S., Kulmala M. (2019) Integrated Multi-Scale Modelling for Meteorology-Chemistry-Aerosol Interactions. Report Series in Aero-sol Science, (226), 425-429
The general features of Ukrainian forests. The State Forest Resources Agency of Ukraine. Available at: http://dklg.kmu.gov.ua/forest/control/uk/publish/article?art_id=62921&cat_id=32867
Giglio L., Randerson J.T., van der Werf G.R. (2013). Analysis of daily, monthly, and annual burned area using the fourth‐generation global fire emissions database (GFED4). JGR Biogeosciences. 118(1), 317-328. [https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrg.20042]
Global Fire Emission Database. Available at: https://www.globalfiredata.org/index.html
Randerson J.T., Chen Y., van der Werf G.R., Rogers B.M., Morton D.C. (2012). Global burned area and biomass burning emissions from small fires. JGR Biogeosciences, 117(G4). [https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JG002128]
van der Werf G.R., Randerson, T., Giglio L., van Leeuwen, T.T., Chen, Y., Rogers, B.M., Mu M., van Marle, M.J.E., Morton, D.C., Collatz, G.J., Yokelson, R.J., Kasibhatla, P.S. (2017) Global fire emissions estimates during 1997–2016. Earth Syst. Sci. Data, (9): 697–720. [https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-697-2017]
GFED Fire Monitoring. Available at: https://tftei.citepa.org/images/files/2019-10-22-23-24/3.%20MARINELAND-UN-FIRE-WORSHOP-242019.pdf
OMI Aura Atmospheric Chemistry. Available at: https://aura.gsfc.nasa.gov/omi.html
Savenets, M., Dvoretska, I., Nadtochii, L. (2020). Current state of atmospheric air pollution in Ukraine based on Sentinel-5P satellite data. Visnyk of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series "Geology. Geography. Ecology”, (51), 221-233. [https://doi.org/10.26565/2410-7360-2019-51-16]
Yoon J.-H., Rasch P.J., Wang H., Vonoj V., Ganguly D. (2016). The role of carbonaceous aerosols on short‐term variations of precipitation over North Africa. Atmospheric Science Letters, 17(7), 407-414. [https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.672]
Zeng N, Yoon JH, Marengo JA, Subramaniam A, Nobre CA, Mariotti A, Neelin JD. (2008). Causes and impacts of the 2005 Amazon drought. Environmental Research Letters (3): 014002 [https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/3/1/014002]
Initiatives on enhancing the responsibility for open burning. Ministry of energy and environment protection of Ukraine. Available at: https://menr.gov.ua/news/35054.html
Fees for open burning. Ministry of energy and environment protection of Ukraine. Available at: https://menr.gov.ua/news/35078.html
