Models of sacred space

Keywords: model of sacred space, hierophany, hierotopia, heterotopy, liminal, sacred landscape

Abstract

The purpose is to create models of sacral space and the task is to analyze the structure and genesis of sacral space.

Research methods. The creation of sacred space models in geography is predominantly driven by naturalistic, phenomenological and temporal approaches. The methods of their study include: a) habitual structure of geographical space and its forming natural, anthropogenic and natural anthropogenic landscapes; b) perceptual-cognitive interpretation of the sacral space, which is significantly different from the previous version; c) eschatological perception of processes in the landscape.

Results. In forming the models of sacral space, the study paid attention to the peculiarities of space and place. The authors noted that their concepts could be quite antagonistic, which would have an impact on the research model. This approach allows creating models of sacral space with elements of its filling: natural and phenomenological; given the time aspect – eschatological. The natural model is built on the juxtaposition of "sacred" and "profane" in the sense of "heterotopia" as a territorial component. Covers both anthropogenic, natural-anthropogenic, and natural objects and landscapes. The categories "sacral" and "profane" form a vertical bipolar system, the axis of which is "hierophany." Heterotopia includes anthropogenic cores – religious (cult) objects and landscapes, and natural ones – part of the polytheistic subclass of the pagan and neo-pagan group of variants of the class of sacral landscapes, as well as places of force associated with geoactive structures. Phenomenological model is developed based on formation in the person of feeling and contact with the "divine", for the formation of which perceptual-cognitive interpretations of space are applied. It is proposed to include a liminal space in the structure of the phenomenological model, which will include the extension of the hierophony axis above and below the "heterotopic" plane. The eschatological model is based on the theory of catastrophism, which assumes that abrupt and global environmental changes are caused by abrupt natural processes (flood, volcanic eruption, earthquake, impact event, geomagnetic inversion). In religious sources, similar processes are analyzed in eschatology, where cyclical and linear concepts of sacral space development are predominant. The eschatological model has certain features: the singular point coincides with the point of the "apocalypse"; the level of sacralization increases, but with its increase, the time of natural rhythms and cycles decreases and shifts, and the amplitude oscillations become larger, which is reflected in the manifestation of the main eschatological features; after passing the singular point, the amplitude oscillations of the natural rhythms are slowed and smoothed; a new landscape sphere is forming.

Scientific significance. Research aspects define the interpretation of sacred space as one that combines material and spiritual; certain places in the ethnocultural region that have signs of the interaction between the ethnos and the sacred. In the model of sacral space it is expedient to distinguish the categories of topical (hierophany) and choral (hierotopia) components; to distinguish in hierotopia: sacral and profane, sacred and religious space, heterotopia and liminal component. The natural model is part of the space landscape sphere and consists of ritual and cult objects that form an ethnocultural region and in a heterotopic sense, sacral landscapes. The selection of the phenomenological model allows us to consider the sacral space from the standpoint of liminal space, and accordingly – it can be irregular, spatial and go beyond the chronological and spatial perception of the sacral. The eschatological model will reveal the temporal aspects of sacred space, the evolution of which is subordinated to a "global catastrophe". The change in the structure of the sacral space occurs abruptly, with partial or complete destruction of the landscape sphere and elimination of the biotic component.

Practical significance. The proposed models of sacral space significantly expand the existing subject of sacral geography, anthropogenic and ethno-cultural landscape studies. Their application will allow to deepen connections in the interdisciplinary fields of geography, religious studies, philosophy, and cultural studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Григорій Іванович Денисик, Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi State Pedagogical University

Doctor of Science (Geography), Professor

Володимир Миколайович Воловик, Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi State Pedagogical University

Doctor of Science (Geography), Professor

Юрій Васильович Яцентюк, Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi State Pedagogical University

Doctor of Science (Geography), Professor

Алла Григорівна Кізюн, Vinnytsia Trade and Economics Institute, Kyiv National Trade and Economics University

PhD (Geography), Associate Professor

References

Ataman, L.V. (2017). Sacred Spaces: Concepts, Characteristics. Geographical Aspects of Sustainable Development of Regions: Proceedings of the Second International Scientific and Practical Conference (Gomel, March 23-24, 2017) (pp. 38-41). Gomel.

Benvenist, E. (1995) Dictionary of Indo-European Social Terms. Moscow: Progress-University, 456.

Volovyk, V.M. (2013) Ethnocultural landscapes: regional structures and nature management. Vinnitsa: LLC "Vinni-tsa City Printing House", 464.

Volovik, V.N. (2018). Terminosystem of sacral landscaping. Sacred Geography and Culture in the Prism of Spiritu-al Renewal: Experience and Practice: Mat. scientific-practical conf. (April 26-27, 2018) of Kazakh National Ped-agogical University named after Abai (pp. 28-31). Almaty.

Volovyk, V.M. (2011). Ethnocultural landscapes of the towns of Podillya. Uchenye zapiski Tavricheskogo Nacion-alnogo Universitet im. V.I. Vernadsky. Scientific journal. Geography Series. Special issue on the materials of the conference "World of Modern Geography", 24 (63), 2, 3, 109-114.

Gennon, R. (2002). Symbols of Sacred Science. Moscow: Belovodye, 496.

Gomboev, B. Ts. (2004). The cult places of the Barguzin valley in the context of the ethno-cultural history of the Baikal region: diss. … cand. ist. sciences, 24.

Grodzinski, M.D. (2005) Knowledge of the landscape: place and space: a monograph. In 2 volumes. Kyiv: Publish-ing and printing center "Kyiv University", 2, 503.

Denysyk, G.I. (2012). Anthropogenic landscape science: a textbook. Part I. Global Anthropogenic Landscape Stud-ies. Vinnytsia: TD Edelweiss & Co, 336.

Dugin, A.G. (2017). Noomachia: The Wars of the Mind. Geography: Horizons and Civilizations. Moscow: Academ-ic project, 476.

Zenkin, S. (2012). The Divine Sacred. Theory and Art Practice. Moscow: RSGU, 537.

Lavrinova, N.N. (2015). Model of interaction of geographical, cultural and sacral landscapes. Bulletin of the Tambov University. Series: Philological Sciences and Cultural Studies, 2(2), 44-51.

Lidov, A.M. (2009). Hierotopia. Spatial icons and paradigm patterns in Byzantine culture. Moscow: Design. Infor-mation. Cartography, 362.

Patrick, de Lobie. (2004). Eschatology. Moscow: Astrel Publishing House LLC; Publishing house AST, 158.

Metropolitan Hilarion. (1982). Etymological-semantic dictionary of the Ukrainian language. Vol. 2. E-L. Winni-peg: The Volyn Society, 399.

Fundamentals of Eurasia (2002) / Compiled by: N. Agamalyan, V. Galimova, A. Guskov, N. Melent'eva, P. Zari-fullin, M. Khrustov. Moscow: Arktogeya-Center, 800.

Nature and Ethnicity. (1994). Ed. V.S. Krysachenko, M.M. Kiselyov, S.A. Moroz. Kyiv: Scientific Thought, 208.

Romanchuk, S.P. (2002). Sacred Landscapes. Humanitarian Ecological Journal, 4, 1, 112-114.

Tyutyunnik, Yu. G. (2003). Landscape: etymology, hermeneutics, exegetics. Totallogy-XXI (Tenth issue). Post-Classical Studies. Kyiv: TsGU NASU, 54-71.

Fusu, L.I. (2017). Concepts of liminality in scientific discourse as an interdisciplinary problem. Context and Re-flection: Philosophy of the World and Human Being, 6. Is, 3A, 240-246.

Eliade, M. (2000). Selected Works: The Myth of Eternal Return; Images and symbols; Sacred and Secular. Moscow: Ladomir, 488.

Eliade, Mircea. (1994). Sacred and worldly. Moscow: Publishing House of Moscow State University, 144.

Cult (religious practice) / https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_(religious_practice)

Duarte F. (2017). Space, Place and Territory: A Critical Review on Spatialities. New York: Routledge, 168.

Enstedt D. (2015). The social production of sacred space in urban Oslo. Stellenbosch Teological Journal, 1, 2, 15-41.

Foucault Michel. (1999). Aesthetics, Method and Epistemology (Essential Works of Foucault, 1954-1984. Vol. 2). New York: New Press, 528.

Jackson R.H. & R. Henrie. (1983). Perception of sacred space. Journal of Cultural Geography, 3, 2, 94-107.

Kilde J. H. (2008). Sacred power, sacred space: an introduction to Christian architecture and worship. New York: Oxford University Press, 250.

Low Setha M. (2016). Spatializing culture: the ethnography of space and place. New York: Routledge, 276.

Maier E. (1975). Torah as movable territory. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 65, 1, 18-23.

Mishchenko O. (2018) Classification scheme of sacred landscapes. European Journal of Geography, 9 (4), 62-74.

Park Chris C. (1994). Sacred worlds. An introduction to geography and religion. London: Routledge, 332 p.

Sacred and the Profane, the. (2005). Encyclopedia of Religion, Second Edition. Farmington: Thomson Gale, 12, 7964-7978.

Sacred Places: Public Spaces / https://www.mcgill.ca/urbandesign/files/urbandesign/SRP-FINAL-Bartle.pdf

Sacred Space. (2005). Encyclopedia of Religion, Second Edition. Farmington: Thomson Gale, 12, 7978-7986.

Sacred Spaces and Sacred Places by Geoffrey Simmins, PhD / https://dspace.ucalgary.ca/bitstream/handle/1880/

/Sacred%20Spaces.pdf;jsessionid=F1D73007D2042A2787FE5A60B0740ADF?sequence=1

Tuan Y.F. (1978). Sacred space; exploration of an idea. Dimensions of Human Geography. Essays on Some Famil-iar and Neglected Themes (University of Chicago Geography Research Papers (Book 186). Chicago: Committee On Geographical Studies, 84-99.

Published
2020-12-03
Cited
How to Cite
Денисик, Г. І., Воловик, В. М., Яцентюк, Ю. В., & Кізюн, А. Г. (2020). Models of sacred space. Visnyk of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series "Geology. Geography. Ecology", (53), 93-103. https://doi.org/10.26565/2410-7360-2020-53-07