Methodological approaches to determining the border of the suburban zone of the city of Odessa
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is aimed at defining the border of the suburban zone behind economic approaches and leveling (comparing) the results with certain borders in the General plan. The development of suburban areas is one of the elements of the transformation of the economy of the city and region, determines the pace of their development. Though even today there is no common point of view on the interpretation of the concept of "suburban zone", there is no clear distinction between the definitions of "suburb", "suburban territory", "suburban area". In addition, it is important to define the boundaries of the city and suburban area, since cities tend to "expand" and "capture" adjacent territories. The boundaries of cities change significantly, which requires a corresponding study of the boundaries of the suburban zone, thus, the topic of work is re-levant.
Methodology. The article considers options for delineating borders according to existing legislative acts that define the outer border of the suburban zone of large cities with an isochronous 45-60-minute accessibility by public transport to the city. In addition, the analysis of research and publications of scientists made it possible to identify other approaches to determining the boundaries of the suburban zone and compare the results with the specified border of the suburban zone in the General plan of Odessa. Thus, calculations were made and the results were visualized, using the ArcGIS Pro software, several options for determining the boundaries of the suburban zone of the city of Odessa, namely: a methodological approach was applied to calculate the population concentration index, the results of which confirmed our assumptions about the concentration of the population in the suburban zone to the place of employment, study, cultural and social development. The second methodological approach is the calculation of the gravitational model based on the distance parameter. The results allowed us to conclude that accessibility of localities to the city center is crucial. In the third approach, using the gravity model of Kareem that combines distance and demographic potential centers of research, defines the borders of suburban zone of the city of Odessa, which are maximally correlated with the specified bounds in the General plan.
Practical significance. Therefore, the conducted research makes it possible to assert that one of the important indicators in determining the border of a suburban zone is the temporary isochrone, that is accessibility to the city, which, in most cases, forms a multidimensional relationship between the city and the suburban zone. The delimitation of the borders of suburban areas of cities will allow for targeted planning of the territory, organization of an effective management system, establishment of geographical features of the city development, use of the suburban territorial resources for urban development, and the relationship between the development of the city and its suburban zone. The city center and its suburban area are interconnected objects of spatial planning documentation at the stages of development of master plans for localities.
Downloads
References
Law of Ukraine «Regulation of urban development activitie» 3038-VI (2011). Information of The Verkhovna Rada Of Ukraine. 34, 343. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3038-17.
Ministry Of Regional Development (2018). Planning and development of territories: DBN B. 2. 2-12: 2018. Kyiv, 230.
State Building of Ukraine (2002) City building. Planning and development of urban and rural settlements: DBN 360-92** [Valid from 2002.04.19]. Kyiv, 67.
Andrievsky I. (2013) Problems of urban agglomerations. Available at: http://vo-vremya.ru/stati/problemyi_gorodskih_aglomeratsiy1301.
Bilokon Yu. M. (2003). Regional planning (theory and practice). Monograph. Kyiv, Logos Publ., 246.
Bilokon Yu. M. (2005). Modern trends in the development of master plans for large cities. Experience and prospects of development of cities of Ukraine. Kyiv: Dipromisto, 5-14.
Bogorad D. I. (1966). Urban agglomerations of the Ukrainian SSR. Main provisions and conclusions. Kyiv, NIISP Gosstroya of the Ukrainian SSR, 73.
General plan of the city of Odessa. Available at: https://service.ombk.odessa.ua/portal/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=b31cc5f267c740aca33f5893c3dc9c45
Gladkiy A.V. (2012). Features of delimitation of monocentric industrial agglomerations of Ukraine (on the example of Lviv and Odessa agglomerations). Economic and social geography: Сollection of scientific papers. Kyiv, 65, 161-173.
Gladkiy O. V., Ishchuk S. I. (2014). Geography of cities. Geourbanistics. Taras Shevchenko national University of Kyiv. Moscow, 300.
Golikov A. P. (2003). Economic and geographical modeling of world economic processes. Kharkiv, Kharkiv national University, 104.
Dnistryanska N. I., Dnestryanskiy M. S. (2013). Very small settlements in Lviv region: social and geographical potential and prospects of development]: monograph. Lviv, House of Ivan Franko LNU, 198.
Ibatullin Sh. I. (2007). Defining the boundaries and directions of urban agglomeration development. Land Management and cadaster, 2, 25-36.
Ishchuk, S. I. (2005). Kiyv economic agglomeration: experience of regional management: monograph. Kiev: Horizons Publ., 239.
Lappo G. M. (1997). Geography of cities. Moscow, 480.
Lappo G. M. (1987). Cities on the way to the future. Moscow: Mysl, 236.
Olynik V., Hropot S.(2017). The Role and purpose of the suburban zone of a large city. Regional policy: history, historical and legal foundations, architecture, urbanism. Сollection of scientific papers in 3 parts. Kiev-Ternopil, 2, 202-205.
Palekha Yu. M. (2015). Experience and prospects of development of cities of Ukraine, 28, 78-88. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/dprmu_2015_28_11
Paleha Yu. M. (2008). Research of the cost of territories of localities – a new direction in the Ukrainian socio-economic geography. Geography in the information society: Collection of scientific papers. Kiyv, 2, 284-286.
Potaev G. A. (2009). Ecological renovation of cities: monography. Minsk, 173, 30.
Pilipenko I. A. (2015). Socio-geographical periphery: concept, parametrization, delimitation: monograph. Kherson. 264.
O. G. Topchiev, I. I. Kondratyuk, V. V. Yavorskaya, V. D. Oleinik, L. V. Khomich et al. (2012). Odessa region: prerequisites for the formation, structure and territorial organization of the economy. Odessa national University named after I. I. Mechnikov. Odessa: Astroprint, 336.
Yatsenko V. O. (2015). Suburban area – retrospective realist, perspective. Modern problems of architecture and urban planning: Collection of scientific papers. Kyiv, KNUBA, 40, 331-340.
Limits on the use of suburban areas. Available at: http://kadastrua.ru/teritorialnij-zemleustrij/66-mezhi-koristuvannya-primiskikh-zon.html
Banski J. (2005). Suburban and peripheral rural areas in Poland: the balance of development in the transformation period. Geografický časopis, 57 (2), 117–130.
Dinić M., Đurić J., Mitković P. (2010). Rural settlements in suburban and scape of the post-socialist city. Landscape Transformations: International interdisciplinary student conference. Prag, 136–144.
Dinić M., Mitković P. (2016). Suburban design: from “bedroom communities” to sustainable neighbor hoods. Geodetsk iVestnik, 60 (1), 98–113.
Dunham-Jones E., Williamson J. (2011). Retrofitting Suburbia, Updated Edition: Urban Design Solutions for Redesigning Suburbs. New York, 288.
Fisher T. (2012). Differentiation of growth processes in the peri-urban region: an Australian case study. Urban Studies, 40 (3), 551–565.
Mumford L. (2006). Grad u istoriji: njegov postanak, njegovo menjanje, njegovi izgledi. Zagreb, 104.
Stanilov K., Scheer B. (2007). Suburban Form: An International Perspective. London, 25–53.
Stanilov K., Sykora L. (2015). Confronting Suburbanization: Urban Decentralization in Post socialist Central and Eastern Europe. Chichester, 256–295.
Tsenkova S., Nedović-Budić Z. (2018). The urban mosaic of post-socialist Europe: space, institutions and policy. New York, 3–20.
