Citizen-centric E-Governance: G2C ecosystems and the transformation of citizen–state interaction in the EU

Keywords: digital governance, G2C interaction, e-government, citizen-centric governance, digital public services, digital platforms, interoperability, European Union

Abstract

Object of the study is the transformation of models of citizen–state interaction in the context of public sector digital transformation, particularly within the Government-to-Citizen (G2C) paradigm in the European Union.

Problem statement. The digital transformation of the public sector leads to significant changes in the ways citizens interact with the state. In European Union countries, these processes are increasingly associated with the transition from traditional e-government models to integrated human-centric digital governance ecosystems.

Unresolved issues. Despite the active implementation of digital governance tools, the evolution of citizen–state interaction models and the systemic development of human-centric G2C ecosystems remain insufficiently conceptualized, especially in the context of their adaptation to Ukrainian realities.

The purpose of the study is to analyze the evolution of citizen–state interaction models in the context of digital transformation, to examine the development of G2C ecosystems in the European Union, and to identify opportunities for applying this experience in Ukraine.

Research methodology and main results. The study employs methods of comparative analysis, generalization of European digital governance policies, and conceptual modeling of G2C ecosystem development. The article systematizes the evolution of citizen–state interaction models –from e-government to human-centric digital governance—and provides a preliminary mapping of G2C ecosystems across EU countries. Key development trends are identified, including the expansion of proactive public services, the emergence of platform-based governance models, the use of artificial intelligence for the personalization of public services, and the development of interoperable digital infrastructures. Particular attention is given to the analysis of key challenges, such as the fragmentation of government information systems, uneven development of electronic identification mechanisms, the digital divide among population groups, and regulatory challenges related to the use of artificial intelligence in the public sector.

Scientific novelty lies in the conceptualization of the evolution of citizen–state interaction models in the context of public sector digital transformation and in the systematization of European experience in the development of human-centric G2C ecosystems.

Conclusions. The findings indicate that the transition to human-centric digital governance requires not only technological modernization but also deep institutional transformation, integration of public services, and adherence to the principles of interoperability and proactivity. The results define practical directions for applying European experience in Ukraine, particularly in the integration of digital public services, the development of proactive services, and the enhancement of interoperability among government information systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Liudmyla Ilich, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan University

Doctor of Economics, Professor

Samarjeet Borah, Sikkim Manipal University

Ph. D., Professor

References

Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2020). The future ain't what it used to be: Forecasting the impact of ICT on the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101410

CADE Project. (2026). European Commission launches consultation on building open digital ecosystems in the EU. Retrieved from: https://cadeproject.org/updates/european-commission-launches-consultation-on-building-open-digital-ecosystems-in-the-eu/

Cordella, A., & Tempini, N. (2015). E-government and organizational change: Reappraising the role of ICT and bureaucracy in public service delivery. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.03.005

Diia Business. (2025). European practices of digitalization of public services. Retrieved from: https://business.diia.gov.ua/history-of-success/yevropeiski-praktyky-tsyfrovizatsii-derzhavnykh-posluh-shcho-pratsiuie-ta-chomu-tse-vazhlyvo-dlia-ukrainy [in Ukrainian]

ECDPM. (2024). The EU needs a clear pitch for its human-centric approach to digital transformation. Retrieved from: https://ecdpm.org/work/eu-needs-clear-pitch-its-human-centric-approach-digital-transformation

Eurocities. (2024). A digital future that is human-centred. Retrieved from: https://eurocities.eu/latest/a-digital-future-that-is-human-centred/?gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=22582389589&gbraid=0AAAAApQ8GpRDSHO734ERf51QwxkkZ3_5q&gclid=Cj0KCQjw4a3OBhCHARIsAChaqJPIPdbPIJgY11J3YtHBAH0weTlDPD532tb6PJ_Y3hUD33Yr146ZVBwaAtnTEALw_wcB

European Commission. (2017). New European Interoperability Framework: Promoting seamless services and data flows for European public administrations. Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/isa2/eif_en/

European Commission. (2020). Shaping Europe’s digital future. Retrieved from: https://commission.europa.eu/system/files/2020-02/communication-shaping-europes-digital-future-feb2020_en_4.pdf

European Commission. (2021). 2030 Digital Compass: The European way for the Digital Decade. Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52021DC0118

European Commission. (2022). European Declaration on Digital Rights and Principles. Retrieved from: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/european-declaration-digital-rights-and-principles

European Commission. (2022a). Digital government: Co-creating innovative public services. Retrieved from: https://cordis.europa.eu/article/id/405547-digital-government-co-creating-innovative-public-services-for-citizens-and-businesses

European Commission. (2024). eGovernment Benchmark 2024: Insight Report. Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/digital-decade-2024-egovernment-benchmark

European Court of Auditors. (2022). Special Report 24/2022: e-Government actions targeting businesses. Retrieved from: SR 24/2022 - e-Government actions targeting businesses

Eurostat. (2024). E-government and electronic identification. Statistics Explained. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=E-government_and_electronic_identification

Janowski, T. (2015). Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.001

Linders, D. (2012). From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 446–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.003

Margetts, H., & Dunleavy, P. (2013). The second wave of digital-era governance: a quasi-paradigm for government on the Web. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 371. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0382

Margetts, H., & Naumann, A. (2017). Government as a platform: What can Estonia show the world? Oxford Internet Institute Working Paper. Retrieved from: https://www.oidp.net/docs/repo/doc163.pdf

Meijer, A., & Bolivar, M. P. R. (2016). Governing the Smart City: A Review of the Literature on Smart Urban Governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314564308

O’Reilly, T. (2011). Government as a platform. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 6(1).

Özkiziltan, D., & Landini, F. (2025). Trustworthy and human-centric? The new governance of workplace AI technologies under the EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act. SAGE Journals. https://doi.org/10.1177/10242589251336193

Špaček, D., & Špačková, Z. (2022). Issues of e-government services quality in the digital-by-default era: The case of the national e-procurement platform in Czechia. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy. Retrieved from: https://www.emerald.com/insight/1535-0118.htm

Valle-Cruz, D., Criado, J., Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Ruvalcaba-Gomez, E. (2020). Assessing the public policy-cycle framework in the age of artificial intelligence. Government Information Quarterly, 37(4). Retrieved from: https://repositorio.uam.es/server/api/core/bitstreams/c92e6c87-a8f9-4805-8e38-168e1aa81b94/content

Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Geyer, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence and the Public Sector—Applications and Challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), 596–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1498103

Wray, S. (2025). EU project helps governments design citizen-centric digital services. Global Government Forum. Retrieved from: https://www.globalgovernmentforum.com/eu-project-helps-governments-design-citizen-centric-digital-services/

Published
2026-06-30
Cited
How to Cite
Ilich, L., & Borah, S. (2026). Citizen-centric E-Governance: G2C ecosystems and the transformation of citizen–state interaction in the EU. FINANCIAL AND CREDIT SYSTEMS: PROSPECTS FOR DEVELOPMENT, 2(21), 216-227. https://doi.org/10.26565/2786-4995-2026-2-17
Section
Management of financial and credit systems and the socio-humanitarian component