Spatio-dynamic assessment of key performance indicators (KPIs) for strategic startup valuation
Abstract
The modern entrepreneurial landscape is characterised by high dynamics and significant market uncertainty. The object of the study is the spatial-dynamic assessment of key performance indicators (KPIs) based on integral metrics. These indicators are crucial for an objective assessment of the viability and investment attractiveness of early-stage start-ups, requiring a shift from retrospective financial analysis to metrics focused on forecasting, primarily customer lifetime value.
Problem statement. Traditional methods of corporate financial valuation, in particular discounted cash flow models, are of little use to startups due to a lack of historical financial data, high growth rates, and significant operating losses during the expansion phase. There is an urgent need to develop a unified but contextually adapted system of metrics that would allow founders and investors to objectively assess internal efficiency and make comparisons with relevant market benchmarks.
Unresolved aspects of the problem. Scientific literature demonstrates a high degree of variability in approaches to startup valuation, resulting in significant subjectivity and a wide range of estimated values. There are significant methodological gaps in the use of integral indicators, in particular the ratio of LTV to CAC (customer acquisition cost), which is often incorrectly calculated or interpreted outside the context of industry benchmarks and business development stages, which can lead to wrong investment decisions.
Purpose of the article. The main purpose of the study is to systematise key performance indicators for start-ups by functional blocks. The key task is to scientifically substantiate the decisive role of the LTV/CAC integrated indicator for assessing viability, as well as to develop methodological recommendations for the application of spatial-dynamic benchmarking to improve the objectivity of strategic planning and evaluation of startups.
Presentation of the main material. The study is based on the application of general scientific methods of systematisation, structural-logical modelling, comparative and systematic analysis. A comprehensive KPI taxonomy covering marketing, sales, and financial metrics is presented. The central element of the analysis is the LTV/CAC ratio, its critical threshold values, and its spatial-dynamic interpretation using the example of a case study of three start-ups with different business models.
Conclusions. The developed systematisation provides a structured basis for monitoring key startup parameters, confirming that the LTV/CAC ratio is the quintessence of business model quality assessment. The practical significance lies in providing founders and investors with a validated toolkit for informed spatial-dynamic benchmarking, which contributes to a more efficient allocation of venture capital.
Downloads
References
Ben Saad, F. (2024). How to measure the success of technology-based start-ups – A Comprehensive overview of the perspectives of academics & practitioners. (2023). Junior Management Science (JUMS), 9(1), 1306–1340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5282/jums/v9i1pp1306-1340
Fackler, D., Hölscher, L., Schnabel, C., & Weyh, A. (2021). Does working at a start-up pay off? Small Business Economics, 58(4), 2211–2233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00508-2
Giri, R., & Mukamiya, R. (2024). A study on importance of market research in startup development and its growth. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT), 12(4), Art. IJCRT2404144.
Gómez-Prado, R., Alvarez-Risco, A., Cuya-Velásquez, B. B., Arias-Meza, M., Campos-Dávalos, N., Juarez-Rojas, L., Anderson-Seminario, M. d. l. M., Del-Aguila-Arcentales, S., & Yáñez, J. A. (2022). Product innovation, market intelligence and pricing capability as a competitive advantage in the international performance of startups: Case of Peru. Sustainability, 14(17), 10703. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710703
Kupczyk, T., Dewalska-Opitek, A., Witczak, O., Budziński, M., & Kalita, D. (2024). Business model canvas application in start-up stage business developments – constraints and challenges. European Research Studies Journal, XXVII(4), 921–940.
Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2016). Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 69–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0420
Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Wiley.
Pratama, D. P., & Putra, P. O. H. (2024). Exploring sustainable VR use cases for startup business models: A customized customer development approach. Sustainability, 16, 6254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16146254
Serhiienko, O., Tonieva, K. & Samus, P. (2025). Startup success metrics: comprehensive analysis, contextual adaptation, and application issues. Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics and Technology, 3, 22–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2025-3-3
Serhiienko, O. A., Kyzliuk, O. A., & Chernov, O. O. (2024). Structural factor research of threats to the economic security of the industry in the context of strategic innovation decisions. Problems of Economy, (2), 272–286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-0712-2024-2-272-286
Serhiienko, O. A., Morozova, N. L., & Sokolova, N. O. (2021). Modeling the development of complex hierarchical systems based on the virality of innovations. In V. S. Ponomarenko, T. S. Klebanova, & L. S. Hurianova (Eds.), Models of system analysis in the management of economic processes: Monograph (pp. 103–121). Bratislava–Kharkiv: Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics.
Serhiienko, O. A., Samus, P. O., & Sosnov, I. I. (2025). Development of an adaptive pricing strategy at the early stages of startup growth. Business Inform, (3), 164–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2025-3-164-174
Sharma, S., Chinthamu, N., Praveen, R. V. S., Mutya, B., Manikonda, L., & Deshpande, G. P. (2024). Customer centricity approach to marketing: Unlocking business growth and success. Journal of Informatics Education and Research, 4(3), 3701–3716.
Van de Ven, M., Lara Machado, P., Athanasopoulou, A., Aysolmaz, B., & Turetken, O. (2023). Key performance indicators for business models: A systematic review and catalog. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 21, 753–794. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-023-00650-2
Copyright (c) 2025 FINANCIAL AND CREDIT SYSTEMS: PROSPECTS FOR DEVELOPMENT

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.