Syriam esse nostram… (Cic. Flac. 30). Why did Pompey turn the Seleucid state into a Roman province?

Keywords: Rome, Pompey, Province, Parthia, Seleucids, Syria

Abstract

The article is devoted to the transformation of the Seleucid kingdom into a Roman province during the Eastern campaign of Pompey. Despite the fact that the reasons that pushed Pompey to the creation of a new province were repeatedly discussed in historiography, the question of the motivations of the Roman general remains controversial. Probably, a certain influence on the actions of Pompey had an aim to cope with internal instability in the province, which was caused by years of civil war. However, an analysis of the sources shows that the foreign policy factor had a decisive influence on the actions of Pompey - the desire to use the new province as a bridgehead for a future campaign against Parthia. In this case, a overt violation of the Roman foreign policy principles can be explained - depriving of power of Antiochus XIII who was recognized by the Senate, the military vulnerability of the province of Syria and the deliberate deterioration of relations with the Parthians. Changing the situation in the Roman Republic did not allow Pompey to implement his plans, but the war with Parthia for many decades remained one of the priorities of many Roman leaders, such as Marcus Licinius Crassus, Gaius Julius Caesar and Mark Antony. On the other hand, the new province, which was not defended by the buffer system of the allied kingdoms, itself was exposed to the blows of the Parthian cavalry. In general, the assumption of aggressive intentions of Pompey suggests that the Roman commander in his actions easily abandoned the traditional foreign policy methods of the Roman Senate for political expediency, therefore you should not see in the Pompey a conscious defender of "republican values".

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amela L. 2003: Cneo Pompeyo Magno. El defensor de la República romana. Madrid.

Arrayás I., Heredia С. 2017: Reflexiones sobre la actuación de Pompeyo Magno en Siria y el encaje del reino de Judea a la luz de las fuentes literarias antiguas. Barcino. Monographica Orientalia. 8, 125-159.

Badian E. 1971: Roman Imperialism in the Late Republic. London.

Ball W. 2000: Rome in the East: The Transformation of an Empire. London.

Bellinger A. 1949: The End of the Seleucids. Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences. 38, June, 51-102.

Beness L., Hillard T. 2013: Rei militaris virtus... orbem terrarum parere huic imperio coegit: The Transformation of Roman Imperium, 146-50 BC. In: D. Hoyos (ed.). A Companion to Roman Imperialism. Leiden, 141-154.

Braund D. 1984: Rome and the Friendly King. The Character of the Client Kingship. London.

Butcher K. 2003: Roman Syria and the Near East. London.

Christ K. 2004: Pompeius. Der Feldherr Roms. Eine Biographie. München.

Debevoise N. 2008: Politicheskaya istoriya Parfii. Saint Petersburg. (In Russian).

Dobiáš J. 1931: Les premiers rapports des Romains avec les Parthes et l'occupation de la Syrie. Archiv orientalni. 3, 216-256.

Downey Gl. 1951: The Occupation of Syria by the Romans. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association. 82, 149-163.

Downey Gl. 1963: Ancient Antioch. Princeton.

Edwell P. 2013: The Euphrates as a Boundary between Rome and Parthia in the Late Republic and Early Empire. Antichthon. 47, 191-206.

Ehling K. 2008: Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der späten Seleukiden (164-63 v. Chr.): Vom Tode des Antiochos IV. bis zur Einrichtung der Provinz Syria unter Pompeius. Stuttgart.

Eilers C. 2005: A Roman East: Pompey’s Settlement to the Death of Augustus. In: A. Erskine. Companion to the Hellenistic World. Oxford.

Engels D. 2013: Die städtischen Eliten der Kolonien der syrischen Tetrapolis zwischen Seleukiden, Armeniern, Parthern und Römern. Electrum. 20, 77–115.

Ferrero G. 1915: Velichiye i padeniye Rima: v 5 t. T. 1. Moscow. . (In Russian).

Gelzer M. 2005: Pompeius: Lebensbild eines Römers. Stuttgart.

Girardet K. 1992: Imperium und provinciae des Pompeius seit 67 v. Chr. Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz. 3. 177-188.

Keaveney A. 1981: Roman Treaties with Parthia circa 95-circa 64 BC. The American Journal of Philology. 102, 2, 195-212.

Kühnen A. 2005: Die imitatio Alexandri als politisches Instrument römischer Feldherren und Kaiser in der Zeit von der ausgehenden Republik bis zum Ende des dritten Jahrhunderts n. Chr. Duisburg.

Leach J. 1978: Pompey the Great. Oxford.

Lerouge C. 2007: L’image des Parthes dans le monde gréco-romain. Du début du Ier siècle av. J.-C. jusqu’à la fin du Haut-Empire romain. Stuttgart.

Liebmann-Frankfort Th. 1969: La frontiere orientale dans la politique exterieure de la République romaine depuis le traite d’Apamée jusqu’ à la fin de la conquete asiatiques de Pompee (189/88—63). Bruxelles.

Litovchenko S. D. 2005: Armyanskiy pokhod Gneya Pompeya. Drevnosti [Antiquities]. 6, 40-46. (In Russian).

Litovchenko S. D. 2015: Tsarstvovaniye Tigrana II Velikogo v Sirii: problemy khronologii. Antichnyy mir i arkheologiya [Ancient World and Archaeology]. 17, 176-191. (In Russian).

Malitz J. 1984: Caesars Partherkrieg. Historia. 33, 21-59.

Mezheritskiy J.Yu. 2016: "Vosstanovlennaya respublika" imperatora Avgusta. Moscow. (In Russian).

Mittag P. 2009: Zur Integration Antiocheias in den römischen Herrschaftsverband. In: Rom und der Osten im 1. Jahrhundert v. Chr. Akkulturation oder Kampf der Kulturen? Akten des Humboldt-Kollegs Verona, 19.-21. Februar 2004. Cosenza, 177-198.

Mommsen T. 1995: Istoriya Rima: V 5 t. V. 3. Saint Petersburg. (In Russian).

Morrell K. 2017: Pompey, Cato, and the Governance of the Roman Empire. Oxford.

Murphy J. 1993: Pompey's Eastern Acta. The Ancient History Bulletin. 7.4, 136-142.

Panov A.R. 2008: Rim na severo-vostochnykh rubezhakh: vzaimootnosheniya s gosudarstvami severnogo Prichernomor'ya i Zakavkaz'ya v I v. do n. e. – pervoy treti II v. n. e. Arzamas. (In Russian).

Rey-Coquais J.-P. 1978: Syrie Romaine, de Pompée à Dioclétien// The Journal of Roman Studies. 68, 44-73.

Rice Holmes T. 1923: The Roman Republic and the founder of the Empire: In 3 v. V. 1.Oxford.

Ridley R.T. 2006: Antiochos XIII, Pompeius Magnus and the unessayed coup. Ancient Society. 36, 81-95.

Rising T. 2013: Senatorial Opposition to Pompey's Eastern Settlement. A Storm in a Teacup? Historia. 62, 2, 196-221.

Rostovtzeff M. 1941: The Social and Economic History of the Hellenistic World: In three volumes. Vol. 2, Oxford.

Sartre M. 2014: Syrie romaine (70 av. J.-C.-73 apr. J.-C.). Pallas. 96, 253-269.

Schlude J. M., Overman J. A. 2017: Herod the Great: A Near Eastern Case Study in Roman-Parthian Politics// In: J.M. Schlude, B.B. Rubin (eds). Arsacids, Romans, and local elites: cross-cultural interactions of the Parthian Empire. Oxford.

Scullard H.H. 2011: From the Gracchi to Nero: a history of Rome from 133 B.C. to A.D. 68. London New-York.

Seager R. 2002: Pompey the Great : a Political Biography. 2-nd ed. Oxford

Shayegan R. 2011: Arsacids and Sasanians: Political Ideology in Post-Hellenistic and Late Antique Persia. Cambridge.

Sherwin-White A. N. 1984: Roman Foreign Policy in the East: 168 B.С. to A. D. 1. London.

Sherwin-White A. N. 1994: Lucullus, Pompey and the East. In: J. A. Crook , A. Lintott , E. Rawson (eds) Cambridge Ancient History. 2-nd ed. V. 9. Cambridge.

Sicker M. 2000: The pre-Islamic Middle East. London.

Smykov E.V. 2001: Rim i Parfiya: put' k dogovoru (Gney Pompey i parfyane). In: Antichnost': obshchestvo i idei [Antiquity: society and ideas]. Kazan, 118-129. (In Russian).

Smykov E.V. 2006: Siriyskoye namestnichestvo Avla Gabiniya. Antichnyy mir i arkheologiya [Ancient World and Archaeology]. 2, 198-214. (In Russian).

Smykov E.V. 2013: Siriya v 83–63 gg. do n.e.: ot anarkhii k provintsii. Antichnyy mir i arkheologiya [Ancient World and Archaeology]. 16, 112-125. (In Russian).

Southern P. 2002: Pompey the Great: Caesar's Friend and Foe. Stroud.

Steel С. 2013: End of the Roman Republic 146 to 44 BC: Conquest and Crisis. Edinburgh.

Sullivan R. 1990: Near Eastern royalty and Rome, 100-30 BC. Toronto.

Syme R. 1995: Anatolica. Studies in Strabo. Oxford.

Will É. 2003: Histoire politique du monde hellénistique (323–30 av. J.-C.). T. 2: Des avènements d'Antiochus III et de Philippe V à la fin des Lagides. Nancy.

Wirth G. 1983. Pompeius - Armenien - Parther. Mutmassungen zur Bewaltigung einer Krisensituation. Bonner Jahrbücher. 183, 1-60.

Wolski J. 1999: The Seleucids: The Decline and Fall of their Empire. Krakow.

Published
2019-12-17
Cited
How to Cite
Litovchenko/ЛитовченкоS. (2019). Syriam esse nostram… (Cic. Flac. 30). Why did Pompey turn the Seleucid state into a Roman province?. Antiquities (Drevnosti). Kharkiv Historical & Archaeological Annual, 17, 8-20. https://doi.org/10.26565/2309-6608-2019-17-01