Segmented algorithm for three-dimensional reconstruction in linear scan geometry

Keywords: computed tomography, conical beam, Feldkamp algorithm, three-dimensional reconstruction, medical diagnostics

Abstract

Background: Computer tomography is recognized as one of the most powerful methods for diagnosis, and monitoring of a wide range of diseases. It provides the ability to obtain detailed information about the internal structure of organs and bones. Despite the success of computed tomography in areas such as three-dimensional mammography or lung radiography, it has not achieved the same level of widespread as, for example, magnetic resonance imaging, even if CT offers greater accuracy. This is primarily due to safety limitations on the permissible number of examinations due to the harmfulness of X-ray radiation to the patient. One of the main challenges facing researchers is the need to reduce the time of the entire examination and decrease the radiation exposure to the patient. Overcoming these challenges is crucial for improving the overall efficiency of medical services, optimizing treatment plans, and ultimately enhancing patient outcomes. Thus, addressing these issues through innovative algorithms and methods in computed tomography holds significant potential for revolutionizing medical diagnostics and ensuring continuous progress in modern healthcare.

Objectives: The aim of this work was to develop an algorithm for three-dimensional reconstruction that is independent of the conicity of the radiation beam. Therefore, it allows for accurate reconstruction of the entire object with a single rotation of the radiation source around the investigated object.

Materials and Methods: The work utilizes methods of integral transforms and computer modeling to solve inverse problems arising in computer tomography.

Results: An analytical inversion formula was obtained for three-dimensional computer tomography with linear scan geometry and segmentation. The feasibility of the developed algorithm was verified, and a methodology for research with linear motion of the conical emitter and detectors was developed.

Conclusions: The developed algorithm improves the reconstruction of object layers significantly distant from the plane in which the emitter and detector move, compared to existing algorithms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Radon J. On the determination of functions from their integral values along certain manifolds. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. 1986;5(4):170–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.1986.4307775

Proksa R, Kohler T, Grass M, Timmer J. The n-PI-method for helical cone-beam CT. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. 2000;19(9):848–63. https://doi.org/10.1109/42.887834

Tuy HK. An inversion formula for cone-beam reconstruction. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics. 1983;43(3):546–52. https://doi.org/10.1137/0143035

Clack R, Defrise M. Cone-beam reconstruction by use of Radon transform intermediate functions. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 1994;11(2):580–5. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.11.000580

Smith BD. Image reconstruction from cone-beam projections: Necessary and sufficient conditions and reconstruction methods. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. 1985;4(1):14–25. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.1985.4307689

Kudo H, Noo F, Defrise M. Quasi-exact filtered backprojection algorithm for long-object problem in helical cone-beam tomography. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. 2000;19(9):902–21. https://doi.org/10.1109/42.887838

Jacobson C. Fourier methods in 3D-reconstruction from cone-beam data. Linköping: Department of Electrical Engineering, Linköping University; 1996. 256 p.

Grangeat P. Analysis of a 3D imaging device by reconstruction from cone beam X ray radiographs [dissertation]. Ecole Nationale Superieure des Telecommunications. 1987. 458 p.

Feldkamp LA, Davis LC, Kress JW. Practical cone-beam algorithm. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 1984;1(6):612–9. https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.1.000612

Fu Z, Tseng HW, Vedantham S. An attenuation field network for dedicated cone beam breast CT with short scan and offset detector geometry. Scientific Reports. 2024;14:319. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-51077-1

Wu Weiwen, Quan Chao, Liu Fenglin. Filtered back-projection image reconstruction algorithm for opposite parallel linear CT scanning. Acta Optica Sinica. 2016;36(9):0911009. https://doi.org/10.3788/aos201636.0911009

Smith BD. Cone-beam tomography: Recent advances and a tutorial review. Optical Engineering. 1990;29(5):524–34. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.55621

Kowalski G. Fast 3-D scanning systems using a limited tilting angle. Applied Optics. 1977;16(6):1686–90. https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.16.001686

Zeng GL, Clack R, Gullberg GT. Implementation of Tuy’s cone-beam inversion formula. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 1994;39(3):493–507. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/39/3/014

Hatamikia S, Biguri A, Herl G, Kronreif G, Reynolds T, Kettenbach J, et al. Source-detector trajectory optimization in cone-beam computed tomography: A comprehensive review on today’s state-of-the-art. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 2022;67(16):16TR03. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ac8590

Reynolds T, Ma YQ, Kanawati AJ, Constantinidis A, Williams Z, Gang G, et al. Extended intraoperative longitudinal 3-dimensional cone beam computed tomography imaging with a continuous multi-turn reverse helical scan. Investigative Radiology. 2022;57(11):764–72. https://doi.org/10.1097/rli.0000000000000885

Hatamikia S, Biguri A, Kronreif G, Kettenbach J, Russ T, Furtado H, et al. Optimization for customized trajectories in cone beam computed tomography. Medical Physics. 2020;47(10):4786–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14403

Zeng GL. Revisit of the ramp filter. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. 2015;62(1):131–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/tns.2014.2363776

Published
2024-08-08
Cited
How to Cite
Vikhtinskaya, T. G., Lapitan, K. E., & Nemchenko, K. E. (2024). Segmented algorithm for three-dimensional reconstruction in linear scan geometry. Biophysical Bulletin, (51), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.26565/2075-3810-2024-51-03
Section
Medical physics

Most read articles by the same author(s)