New promising agents against COPD and asthma among the amides of 1-oxo-3-phenyl-isochroman-6-carboxylic acid

Keywords: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), muscarinic acetylcholine receptor, virtual screening, molecular docking, tensometry, selective M3 antagonists

Abstract

Background: Bronchodilators, which are compounds that can relax airway smooth muscle, are perhaps the most important component of combination therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, one of the most common non-communicable diseases in the world, which is the second most lethal disease after cardiovascular disease. Unfortunately, current clinical bronchodilators, whose activity is mediated by their interaction with muscarinic acetylcholine receptors, have side effects (up to myocardial infarction) due to their cross-affinity for different types of these receptors, including those prevalent in the heart muscle.

Objectives: The aim of this work is to search/develop compounds — effective bronchodilators capable of selectively inhibiting type 3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (M3 receptors), predominantly present in smooth muscles and not characteristic of cardiomyocytes.

Materials and Methods: High-throughput virtual screening of a collection of 150,000 compounds was conducted on the spatial structure of the M3 receptor, reconstructed in our previous studies. The effect of substances on contractile activity was investigated using tensometry in isometric mode on multicellular tracheal preparations. Antagonistic activity and type of inhibition were determined against the background of acetylcholine application (concentration range 10-10–10-3 M). To establish the affinity value of the compound-antagonist, the Schild regression equation was used.

Results: Based on virtual screening data, a series of compounds — amides of 1-oxo-3-phenyl-iso-chroman-6-carboxylic acid — were selected for biological testing. For two of these compounds (Compounds 1 and 7), the ability to selectively inhibit M3 receptors was demonstrated. Specifically, the affinity value pKB for Compound 1 was 7.28 ± 0.70, with an IC50 of 5.25·10-8 M. A critically important advantage of this compound is its ability, at equal concentrations, to more effectively inhibit signal transmission through M3 receptors compared to ipratropium bromide — a clinical cholinergic receptor inhibitor.

Conclusions: The sufficient effectiveness of inhibition and significantly increased selectivity of the studied compounds specifically towards M3 receptors provide strong grounds to consider these compounds as promising precursors of new generation cholinolytic drugs with targeted action on M3-type cholinergic receptors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cavazos Galván M. Asthma in emergency department. Guidelines, physicians and patients. Rev Alerg Mex. 2006 Jul-Aug;53(4):136–43. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17137189/

Zeng Z, Mukherjee A, Varghese AP, Yang XL, Chen S, Zhang H. Roles of G protein-coupled receptors in inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Mar 28;26(12):1242–61. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i12.1242

Ilyaskina OS, Lemoine H, Bünemann M. Lifetime of muscarinic receptor–G-protein complexes determine coupling efficiency and G-protein subtype selectivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018 May 8;115(19):5016–21. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715751115

Saternos HC, Almarghalani DA, Gibson HM, Meqdad MA, Antypas RB, Lingireddy A, et al. Distribution and function of the muscarinic receptor subtypes in the cardiovascular system. Physiol Genomics. 2018 Jan 1;50(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1152/physiolgenomics.00062.2017

Ishii M, Kurachi Y. Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptors. Curr Pharm Des. 2006 Oct 1;12(28):3573–81. https://doi.org/10.2174/138161206778522056

Tobin G, Giglio D, Lundgren O. Muscarinic receptor subtypes in the alimentary tract. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2009 Mar;60(1):3–21. Available from: https://europepmc.org/article/med/19439804

Lee HW, Park J, Jang EJ, Lee CH. Comparisons of exacerbations and mortality among LAMA/LABA combinations in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. Respir Res. 2020 Dec 25;21(1):310. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-020-01540-8

Kruse AC, Kobilka BK, Gautam D, Sexton PM, Christopoulos A, Wess J. Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors: novel opportunities for drug development. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2014 Jul 6;13(7):549–60. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd4295

Rhee CK, Yoshisue H, Lad R. Fixed-Dose Combinations of Long-Acting Bronchodilators for the Management of COPD: Global and Asian Perspectives. Adv Ther. 2019 Mar 11;36(3):495–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-0893-3

Abrams P, Andersson K, Buccafusco JJ, Chapple C, de Groat WC, Fryer AD, et al. Muscarinic receptors: their distribution and function in body systems, and the implications for treating overactive bladder. Br J Pharmacol. 2006 Jul 29;148(5):565–78. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0706780

Eglen RM. Muscarinic Receptor Subtype Pharmacology and Physiology. In: King FD, Lawton G, editors. Progress in Medicinal Chemistry. Vol. 43. Elsevier; 2005. p. 105–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0079-6468(05)43004-0

Barnes PJ. Muscarinic receptor subtypes in airways. Life Sci. 1993 Jan;52(5–6):521–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3205(93)90310-y

Miravitlles M, Anzueto A, Jardim JR. Optimizing bronchodilation in the prevention of COPD exacerbations. Respir Res. 2017 Dec 20;18(1):125. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-017-0601-2

Eglen RM. Overview of Muscarinic Receptor Subtypes. In: Muscarinic Receptors. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2012. p. 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23274-9_1

Gomes F, Cheng SL. Pathophysiology, Therapeutic Targets, and Future Therapeutic Alternatives in COPD: Focus on the Importance of the Cholinergic System. Biomolecules. 2023 Mar 5;13(3):476. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13030476

Maqsood MH, Rubab K, Maqsood MA. The Role of Revefenacin in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Cureus. 2019 Apr 10; 11(4):e4428. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.4428

Nadler LS, Rosoff ML, Hamilton SE, Kalaydjian AE, McKinnon LA, Nathanson NM. Molecular analysis of the regulation of muscarinic receptor expression and function. Life Sci. 1999 Jan;64(6–7):375–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0024-3205(98)00577-3

Zaagsma J, Roffel AF, Meurs H. Muscarinic control of airway function. Life Sci. 1997 Feb;60(13–14):1061–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0024-3205(97)00048-9

Nyporko A, Tsymbalyuk O, Voiteshenko I, Starosyla S, Protopopov M, Bdzhola V. Computer‐aided design of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3 inhibitors: Promising compounds among trifluoromethyl containing hexahydropyrimidinones/thiones. Mol Inform. 2023 Aug 9;42(8–9). https://doi.org/10.1002/minf.202300006

Abagyan R, Raush E, Totrov M. ICM Manual v.3.9 [Internet]. Molsoft, LLC. [cited 2023 Nov 30]. Available from: https://www.molsoft.com/icm

Protopopov M V., Starosyla SA, Borovykov O V., Sapelkin VN, Bilokin Y V., Bdzhola VG, et al. Hit identification of CK2 inhibitors by virtual screening. Biopolym Cell. 2017 Aug 31;33(4):291–301. https://doi.org/10.7124/bc.00095B

Morris GM, Huey R, Lindstrom W, Sanner MF, Belew RK, Goodsell DS, et al. AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J Comput Chem. 2009 Dec 27;30(16):2785–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21256

Sheridan RP, Maiorov VN, Holloway MK, Cornell WD, Gao YD. Drug-like Density: A Method of Quantifying the “Bindability” of a Protein Target Based on a Very Large Set of Pockets and Drug-like Ligands from the Protein Data Bank. J Chem Inf Model. 2010 Nov 22;50(11):2029–40. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci100312t

Dassault Systèmes. BIOVIA Discovery Studio Visualizer [Internet]. Dassault Systèmes. 2020 [cited 2023 Nov 30]. Available from: https://discover.3ds.com/discovery-studio-visualizer-download

Tsymbaliuk OV, Naumenko AM, Skoryk MA, Nyporko OYu, Davidovska TL, Skryshevsky VA. Histamine- and nicotine-stimulated modulations of mechanic activity of smooth muscles in gastrointestinal tract at the impact of nanosized TiO2 material. Biopolym Cell. 2016 Apr 30;32(2):140–9. https://doi.org/10.7124/bc.000917

Naumenko AM, Dmytrenko O V., Shapoval LM, Tsymbalyuk O V., Sagach VF, Davydovska TL. Effects of Injections of Nanostructured Titanium Dioxide into the Rat Medullary Nuclei Involved in Cardiovascular Control. Neurophysiology. 2018 Nov 18;50(6):409–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-019-09772-1

Naumenko AM, Shapoval LM, Nyporko AYu, Voiteshenko MI, Tsymbalyuk A V., Sagach VF, et al. Computer Simulation of Molecular Interaction Between Baclofen and the GABAB Receptor. Neurophysiology. 2017 Feb 1;49(1):2–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-017-9623-0

Luo L, Zhang G, Mao L, Wang P, Xi C, Shi G, et al. Group II muscarinic acetylcholine receptors attenuate hepatic injury via Nrf2/ARE pathway. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2020 May;395:114978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2020.114978

Baroffio M, Crimi E, Brichetto L, Zappi L, Rehder K, Brusasco V. Pre-junctional muscarinic autoreceptors in bovine airways. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2012 Jan;180(1):45–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2011.10.007

Naumenko AM, Nyporko AYu, Tsymbalyuk OV, Golius A, Shapoval LM, Davidovska TL. 3D reconstruction of a full-size GABAB receptor. Neurophysiology. 2015;47:364–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-016-9544-3

Aparici M, Carcasona C, Ramos I, Montero JL, Otal R, Ortiz JL, et al. Pharmacological Profile of AZD8871 (LAS191351), a Novel Inhaled Dual M3 Receptor Antagonist/β2-Adrenoceptor Agonist Molecule with Long-Lasting Effects and Favorable Safety Profile. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2019 Jul;370(1):127–36. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.118.255620

Published
2023-12-30
Cited
How to Cite
Nyporko, A., Tsymbalyuk, O., Voiteshenko , I., Starosyla , S., Protopopov, M., & Bdzhola, V. (2023). New promising agents against COPD and asthma among the amides of 1-oxo-3-phenyl-isochroman-6-carboxylic acid. Biophysical Bulletin, (50), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.26565/2075-3810-2023-50-04
Section
Molecular biophysics