Photoperiod-induced changes in total nitrogen and soluble protein content in soybean leaves
Abstract
Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) is a short-day plant highly sensitive to photoperiod, with this sensitivity largely regulated by maturity (E) genes. These genes influence a wide range of developmental processes, including flowering time, morphological traits, hormone levels, and carbon and nitrogen metabolism. Adaptation to photoperiod involves coordinated changes in morphology, physiology, and biochemistry, ensuring timely transition to reproductive development and optimal crop formation. Field experiments were conducted at the experimental plots of the Department of Physiology and Biochemistry of Plants and Microorganisms of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. This study investigated the effects of photoperiod duration on total nitrogen and soluble protein content in the leaves of near-isogenic soybean lines of the Clark variety, differing in E1–E4 gene combinations. Short-day lines (Clark variety (e1E2E3E4e5E7), line L63-3016 (e1E2E3e4e5E7), line L 80-5879 (E1e2e3E4e5E7) and photoperiod-insensitive lines (L63-3117 (e1e2E3E4e5E7), L71-920 (e1e2e3E4e5E7) were grown under natural long-day conditions (16 h) until the V3 stage. Half of the plants were then exposed to short-day conditions (9 h) for 14 days using blackout treatments. Leaf samples were collected at four time points (before the start of the short day effect, during the short day effect - 7 and 14 days, a week after the short photoperiod effect) to assess total nitrogen and soluble protein levels. The results showed that dominant alleles of E1 and E2 delayed the transition to the reproductive phase and significantly affected nitrogen and protein accumulation. Specifically, E1 reduced total nitrogen under both photoperiods, while E2 increased it under long-day conditions. Both E1 and E2 lowered soluble protein content under short-day exposure. No significant effects of E3 and E4 were observed. These results demonstrate that the regulation of nitrogen metabolism and protein synthesis in soybean is closely modulated by the interaction between photoperiod and maturity gene expression.
Downloads
References
Anas, M., Liao, F., Verma, K. K. et al. (2020). Fate of nitrogen in agriculture and environment: Agronomic, eco-physiological and molecular approaches to improve nitrogen use efficiency. Biological Research, 53, 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-020-00312-4
Brown, D., Feeney, M., Ahmadi, M. et al. (2017). Subcellular localization and interactions among rubber particle proteins from Hevea brasiliensis. Journal of Experimental Botany, 68(18), 5045–5055. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx331
Cao, D., Takeshima, R., Zhao, C. et al. (2017). Molecular mechanisms of flowering under long days and stem growth habit in soybean. Journal of Experimental Botany, 68(8), 1873–1884. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erw394
Dong, L., Hou, Z., Li, H. et al. (2022). Agronomical selection on loss‐of‐function of GIGANTEA simultaneously facilitates soybean salt tolerance and early maturity. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 64(10), 1895–1909. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.13332
Gibon, Y., Pyl, E. T., Sulpice, R. et al. (2009). Adjustment of growth, starch turnover, protein content and central metabolism to a decrease of the carbon supply when Arabidopsis is grown in very short photoperiods. Plant, Cell & Environment, 32(7), 859–874. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01965.x
Gramma, V., Olas, J. J., Zacharaki, V. et al. (2024). Carbon and nitrogen signaling regulate FLOWERING LOCUS C and impact flowering time in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 197(1), kiae594. https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiae594
Kinmonth-Schultz, H., Lewandowska-Sabat, A., Imaizumi, T. et al. (2021). Flowering times of wild Arabidopsis accessions from across Norway correlate with expression levels of FT, CO, and FLC genes. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 747740. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.747740
Kleuter, M., Yu, Y., Verdegaal, L., Pancaldi, F. et al. (2024). Characterizing the extractable proteins from tomato leaves – A proteomics study. Food Chemistry: X, 25, 102114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2024.102114
Leghari, S. J., Wahocho, N. A., Laghari, G. M. et al. (2016). Role of nitrogen for plant growth and development: A review. Advances in Environmental Biology, 10(9), 209–219.
Li, Y., Xu, Q., Zhang, Z. et al. (2018). Molecular mechanisms controlling flowering time in soybean. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 60(9), 783–798. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.13021
Li, Z., Hu, J., Tang, H. et al. (2022). Temperature and photoperiod change the flowering process in Prunella vulgaris by inducing changes in morphology, endogenous hormones, carbon/nitrogen metabolites, and gene expression. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 147(2), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS05144-21
Lin, Y.-L., Tsay, Y.-F. (2017). Influence of differing nitrate and nitrogen availability on flowering control in Arabidopsis. Journal of Experimental Botany, 68(10), 2603–2609. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx053
Maathuis, F. J. M. (2009). Physiological functions of mineral macronutrients. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 12, 250–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2009.04.003
Miller, G. L. (1959). Protein determination for large numbers of samples. Analytical Chemistry, 31(5), 964–966. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60147a030
Olas, J. J., Van Dingenen, J., Abel, C. et al. (2019). Nitrate acts at the Arabidopsis thaliana shoot apical meristem to regulate flowering time. New Phytologist, 223(2), 814–827. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15812
Peng, J., Feng, Y., Wang, X. et al. (2021). Effects of nitrogen application rate on the photosynthetic pigment, leaf fluorescence characteristics, and yield of indica hybrid rice and their interrelations. Scientific Reports, 11, 7485. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86858-z
Piper, E. L., Boote, K. I. (1999). Temperature and cultivar effects on soybean seed oil and protein concentrations. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, 76(10), 1233–1241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-999-0099-y
Raievska, I. M., Schogolev, A. S. (2023). Genetic variation in four maturity genes and photoperiod insensitivity effects on the yield components and on the growth duration periods of soybean. Regulatory Mechanisms in Biosystems, 14(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.15421/022309
Schogolev, A. S., Raievska, I. M. (2021). Role of nitrogen deficiency on growth and development near isogenic by E genes lines of soybean co-inoculated with nitrogen-fixing bacteria. Regulatory Mechanisms in Biosystems, 12(2), 326–334. https://doi.org/10.15421/022144
Seaton, D. D., Graf, A., Baerenfaller, K. et al. (2018). Photoperiodic control of the Arabidopsis proteome reveals a translational coincidence mechanism. Molecular Systems Biology, 14(3), e7962. https://doi.org/10.15252/msb.20177962
Staniak, M., Szpunar-Krok, E., Kocira, A. (2023). Responses of soybean to selected abiotic stresses – Photoperiod, temperature, and water. Agriculture, 13(1), 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13010146
Staniak, M., Szpunar-Krok, E., Wilczewski, E. et al. (2024). The function of macronutrients in helping soybeans to overcome the negative effects of drought stress. Agronomy, 14, 1744. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14081744
Tariq, S., Kumar, M., Alam, B. et al. (2022). Abiotic stress and plant response: Adaptive mechanisms of plants against multiple stresses. In S. Tariq, M. Kumar, B. Alam, S. Kumar, S. Roy, S. Kumar, J. Rane, & S. Kumar (Eds.), Abiotic Stress in Plants: Mechanisms and Adaptations (pp. 1–18). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90568-8.00001-8
Wang, M., Wang, J., Wang, Z., Teng, Y. (2024). Nitrate signaling and its role in regulating flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(10), 5310. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25105310
Watanabe, S., Xia, Z., Tsubokura, Y. et al. (2011). The soybean FT homolog, GmFT2a, is involved in photoperiodic flowering control. Plant and Cell Physiology, 52(5), 894–903. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcr042
Weber, K., Burow, M. (2018). Nitrogen – essential macronutrient and signal controlling flowering time. Physiologia Plantarum, 162(2), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12664
Xia, Z. J., Watanabe, S., Yamada, T. et al. (2012). Positional cloning and characterization reveal the molecular basis for soybean maturity locus E1 that regulates photoperiodic flowering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(32), 2155–2164. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1117982109
Xu, M., Xu, Z., Liu, B. et al. (2013). Genetic variation in four maturity genes affects photoperiod insensitivity and PHYA-regulated post-flowering responses of soybean. BMC Plant Biology, 13(91), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-13-91
Xu, Y., Koroma, A. A., Weise, S. E. et al. (2023). Daylength variation affects growth, photosynthesis, leaf metabolism, partitioning, and metabolic fluxes. Plant Physiology, 194(1), 475–490. https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiad507
Zhou, H., Yao, X., Zhao, Q. et al. (2019). Rapid effect of nitrogen supply for soybean at the beginning flowering stage on biomass and sucrose metabolism. Scientific Reports, 9, 15530. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52043-6
Lyashenko, V. V., Lotysh, I. I., Taranenko, A. O. et al. (2019). Vplyv azotnykh dobryv na urozhaynistʹ ta yakistʹ nasinnya soyi. Scientific Progress & Innovations, (4), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.31210/visnyk2019.04.07 (In Ukrainian)
Shepilova, T. (2011). Vplyv dobryv ta inokulyatsiyi nasinnya na urozhaynistʹ soyi. Silʹsʹkohospodarsʹka mikrobiolohiya, 13, 117–123. https://doi.org/10.35868/1997-3004.13.117-123 (In Ukrainian)
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal the right of its first publication under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0), that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship.
