Conceptualization of social security in the context of sociological knowledge

Keywords: security, social security, social danger, functional, neo-functional paradigm

Abstract

The author proposes a systematization of the results of the review of publications on security issues in the social sciences and humanities, which allowed several major areas of research. The paper also deals with construction of a model of social security as an indicator of generalized social homeostasis, created as a result of balancing the functions of basic social institutions. It’s proposed to apply a structural functionalism and neofunctionalism as dominant methodology for interpretation of social security as a social institution homeostasis’ control and social sustainability of the social environment while maintaining constancy intrasystem parameters. There was determined inequivalence of different types of social security in providing social homeostasis by their correlation with the four types of social subsystems (institutions): semantic, reproductive, regulatory and transmission also.

The paper argued that the leading role in ensuring social homeostasis play a meaning- (religious, ideological, cultural) subsystems, corresponding to the value stabilization of society. At the same time, the article emphasizes that meanings and values produced by these institutions’ subjects (actors) initially embedded through socialization and communication (transmission) subsystems and are subject to secondary fixation at the level of social action through regulatory social institutions (politics, law). The final element of social security is to ensure the homeostasis of the lowest level of social order (institutes of economics and the family).

Author justified the position on the understanding of the social security system as independent institution one within the framework of the two models of the social world: systematic and stochastic. It is indicated that the system map of the social world meets modernist paradigm of sociological theorizing, which is characteristic for the consideration of social security as a factor of change that promotes social cohesion, rather than its decay. Whereas stochastic map of the social world corresponds to a postmodern paradigm, main characteristic feature of which is looking at and perception of social security as part of polycentric social reality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Valeriy Nikolayevskyy, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4, Svoboda Sq., Kharkov 61022, Ukraine

Ph.D. in Sociology, Post Doctorate Associateat Department of Sociology, vnikolayevskyy@gmail.com

References

Arbatov А. Natsionalnaya bezopasnost Rossii v mnogopolyarnom mire // Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya. – 2007. – Nr.10. – Pp. 21 – 28. (in Russian)

Belov P. H. Metodologicheskiye aspekty natsionalnoy bezopasnosti Rossii. – М. : Izd-vo FTSNTP «Bezopasnost», 2002. (in Russian)

Bezopasnost Yevropy / Zhurkin V.V. (Ed.). – M.: Ves mir, 2011. (in Russian)

Bodruk О. Ukraina v systemi mizshnarodnoy bezpeky. – К. : NIPMB, 2003. (in Ukrainian)

Burkin A. I. Natsionalnaya bezopasnost Rossii / A. I. Burkin, A. V. Vozzhenikov, V.N. Sineok. – М. : RAGS, 2008. (in Russian)

Czaputowicz J. Bezpieczenstwo miedzynarodowe: wspolczesne koncepcje. – Warszawa : Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 2012. (in Polish)

Dillon M. Politics of Security: Towards a Political Philosophy of Continental Thought. – L. – N.Y. : Routledge, 1996.

Explaining the EU's Common Security and Defence Policy Theory in Action / Kurowska X.; Breuer F. (Eds.). – Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.

Furashev V. M. Natsionalna bezpeka Ukrainy: shlyakhy zabezpechennya, rol i mistse suspilstva. Yevroatlantychnyy kurs / V.M. Furashev, S.F. Dzherdzh. – K. : Synopsys, 2009. (in Ukrainian)

Hofmann S. European Security in NATO’s Shadow. Party Ideologies and Institution Building. – Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2013.

Jordan A. American National Security. 6th Edition / A. Jordan, Jr. Taylor, J. William, M. Meese, S. Nielsen. – Baltimore : The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009.

Kokoshyn А. А. Politiko-voennye i voyenno-strategicheskiye problemy natsionalnoy bezopasnosti Rossii i mezhdunarodnoy bezopasnosti. – M. : Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki, 2014. (in Russian)

Lipkan V. A. Teoriya natsionalnoy bezpeky. – K.: KNT, 2009. (in Ukrainian)

McNamara R. The Essence of Security:Reflections in Office. – N. Y., 1968.

Prokhozhev A. A. Obschaya teoriya natsionalnoy bezopasnosti. – М. : Izd-vo RAGS pri Prezidente RF, 2002. (in Russian)

Smeshko І. Natsionalna bezpeka Ukrainy: vyklyky doby globalnykh transformatsiy / Іhor Smeshko // Yevroatlantika. – 2013. – Nr.1-2. – Pp. 26 – 29.

Tendency of national security in the Baltic sea region / Makstutis A. (Ed.). – Vilnius : The General Jonas Zemaitis Military Academy of Lithuania, 2006.

Voenno-politicheskiye issledovaniya v Rossii: spravochnik / NP RSMD; I.S.Ivanov (Ed.). – M.: NP RSMD, Ves mir, 2014. (in Russian)

Wolfers A. National Security as an Ambiguous Symbol // Political Science Quarterly. – 1952. – Nr.67(4). – Pp. 481 – 502.

Boin A. Preparing for the World Risk Society: Towards a New Security Paradigm for the European Union / A. Boin, M. Ekengren // Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management. – 2009. – Nr.17(4). – Pp. 285 – 294.

Critical Security Studies / Vaughan-Williams N.; Peoples C. (Eds.). – N.Y. : Routledge, 2012.

Critical Security Studies and World Politics / Booth K. (Ed.). – Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2005.

Buzan B. Peace, Power, and Security: Contending Concepts in the Study of International Relations // Journal of Peace Research. – 1984. – Nr. 21(2). – Pp. 109 – 125.

Buzan B. and de Wilde J. Security: a new framework for analysis / B. Buzan, O. Waever, J. de Wilde. – L. : Boulder, 1998.

Handbook of Security Studies / M. Cavelty, V.V. Mauer. (Eds.). – London : Routledge, 2009.

Neocleous M. Critique of Security. – Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press, 2008.

On Security / Lipschutz R. (Ed.). – N.Y. : Columbia University Press, 1995.

Stone M. Security According to Buzan: A Comprehensive Security Analysis / Security Discussion Papers Series. – Nr. 1. – Paris-N.Y. : CUP, SIPA – N.Y., 2009.

Taureck R. Securitization Theory and Securitization Studies // Journal of International Relations and Development. – 2006. – Nr.9. – Pp. 53 – 61.

Williams M.C. Words, Images, Enemies: Securitization and International Politics // International Studies Quarterly. – 2003. – Nr.47. – Pp. 511 – 531.

Human Security. Human Development Report 2002/2003. – Riga : UNDP Latvia, 2003.

Beydina T. Ye. Sotsialnaya bezopasnost (regionalnyye aspekty) / T. Ye. Beydina, V. I. Lykov, M. Yu. Shvetsov. – Chita : Izd-vo ChitGU, 2001. (in Russian)

Buryanov O.V. Sotsialnaya bezopasnost rossiyskogo obschestva. – Rostov n/D, 1999. (in Russian)

Novikova O. Sotsialnaya bezopasnost v Ukraine: vozmozhnosti chelovecheskogo razvitiya. – LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2012. (in Russian)

Osadchaya H. I. and Roik V. D. Sotsialnyye aspekty ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti Rossii / H.I. Osadchaya, V.D. Roik. – M. : Mysl, 2006. (in Russian)

Plotnikov V.S. Sotsialnaya bezopasnost v perekhodnom obschestve: soderzhanie i mekhanizmy obespecheniya. Tekst avtoref. dis. kand.sotsiol.nauk. – Novosibirsk, 2004. (in Russian)
Published
2017-01-26
How to Cite
Nikolayevskyy, V. (2017). Conceptualization of social security in the context of sociological knowledge. Ukrainian Sociological Journal, (1-2), 28-36. Retrieved from https://periodicals.karazin.ua/usocjour/article/view/4387
Section
Статті