THE ECONOMIC EFFECT OF CORRUPTION: A THEORETICAL ASPECT

Keywords: public administration, corruption, strategy, state policy, efficiency

Abstract

Against the background of the widespread perception of corruption as a negative phenomenon, moreover, as a crime that is directly or indirectly enshrined in the legal field of modern states, it is necessary to recognize the existence of lack unity and some controversy in that question by economists and other researchers and even the existence of positive impact on economic development.

Some researchers believe that corruption can increase efficiency because it removes government-imposed rigidities that hinder investment and hinder other growth-friendly economic decisions. However, above theoretical arguments, which positively assess corruption, do not stand up to criticism. First, restrictions and rules are not exogenous and immovable features of society; society is not born with these harsh traits. They are created, and in fact can be intentionally created by officials to receive bribes. Second, those who can give the highest bribes are not the most cost-effective, but rather the most successful in finding rent. If bribes are considered investments, then those who pay it should consider these bribes as high-return investments.

The fight against corruption cannot be separated from state reform. It is important to note that corruption will be reduced only in countries where governments want to reduce their functions. In any case, an effective strategy aimed at reducing corruption requires political strength to implement it and be active in the following areas:

1. Formation in the leadership of the state and the state authorities of zero tolerance for corruption.

2. Policy changes that reduce the demand for corruption, through the reduction of regulations and policies such as tax incentives, as well as by maintaining the most transparent and non-discriminatory measures.

3. Reducing the supply of corruption by increasing wages in the public sector, increasing incentives for honest behavior, introducing a system of control and mulcts for public servants.

4. Resolve the issue of financing political parties. Communities can do much to reduce the intensity of corruption, but none of this will lead to its complete eradication. The necessary measures may require major changes in the implementation of all public policy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baumol William J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive. Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 98 (October). Р. 893–921.

Beck Paul J. and Michael W. Maher (1986). A Comparison of Bribery and Bidding in Thin Markets. Economics Letters. Vol. 20. № 1. Р. 1–5.

Becker Gary S. and George J. Stigler (1974). Law Enforcement, Malfeasance and Compensation for Employees. Journal of Legal Studies (January). Р. 1–18.

Graziano Luigi (1980). Clientelismo e Sistema Politico. II Caso del’Italia. Milan : F. Angeli. 199 р.

Huntington Samuel P. (1968). Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, Connecticut : Yale University Press. URL: https://projects.iq.harvard.edu/files/gov2126/files/huntington_political_order_changing_soc.pdf.

Klitgaard Robert E. (1988). Controlling Corruption. Berkeley, California : University of California Press. 230 р.

Leff Nathaniel (1964). Economic Development Through Bureaucratic Corruption. American Behavioral Scientist. Р. 8–14.

Lui Francis T. (1985). An Equilibrium Queuing Model of Bribery. Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 93 (August). Р. 760–81.

Lui Francis T. (1996). Three Aspects of Corruption. Contemporary Economic Policy. Vol. 14 (July). Р. 26–29.

Mauro Paolo (1995). Corruption and Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 110 (August). Р. 681–712.

Myrdal Gunnar (1968). Asian Drama: An Inquiry into the Poverty of Nations. New York : Twentieth Century Fund. 2284 р.

Shleifer Andrei and Robert W. Vishny (1993). Corruption. Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 108 (August). Р. 599–617.

Tanzi Vito and Hamid Davoodi (1997). Corruption, Public Investment, and Growth. IMF Working Paper 97/139. URL: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2016/12/30/Corruption-Public-Investment-and-Growth-2353.

Transparency International Ukraine. URL: http://ti-ukraine.org/news/oficial/5741.html.

Tullock Gordon (1996). Corruption Theory and Practice. Contemporary Economic Policy. Vol. 14 (July). Р. 6–13.

Weber Max (1947). Еssays in sociology. New York : University Press. 514 р.

Wei Shang-Jin (1997). How Taxing Is Corruption on International Investors? NBER Working Paper № 6030. Cambridge, Massachusetts : National Bureau of Economic Research. DOI 10.3386/w6030.

Published
2021-03-19
How to Cite
Merezhko , S. (2021). THE ECONOMIC EFFECT OF CORRUPTION: A THEORETICAL ASPECT. Theory and Practice of Public Administration, 2(73), 93-101. https://doi.org/10.34213/tp.21.02.10
Section
State Regulation of Economic and Social Development Processes