Institutional-cognitive reconfiguration of public administration in the context of digital transformation: mechanisms for catalyzing innovation and the data economy

Keywords: digital transformation, economic development, public administration, digital economy, institutional innovations, e-governance, breakthrough technologies.

Abstract

Digital transformation has become a defining vector of contemporary development, radically reshaping societal practices and economic processes. The rapid diffusion of digital technologies creates new opportunities to accelerate growth, enhance productivity and quality of life, and modernize public services. At the same time, it brings a range of challenges: widening digital inequality, heightened cybersecurity vulnerabilities, risks to privacy, shifts in the labor market, and more. Under these conditions, adapting systems of public administration to the digital era–above all in the domain of managing economic development–becomes especially important. In a digital economy, traditional governance models require rethinking and supplementation with breakthrough solutions and institutional innovations, enabling governments to implement economic policy more effectively, foster innovation, and ensure sustainable growth.
This article analyzes conceptual approaches (“breakthrough ideas”) to state management of economic development based on digitalization, examines new institutional forms and mechanisms introduced in the public sector to support the digital transformation of the economy, and considers practical case studies of their implementation. A review of recent scholarly publications and strategic documents that lay the groundwork for digital development is conducted. It is found that the active formation of a system of public administration for digital development in Ukraine requires a focused state policy and effective work of newly created institutions, in particular the Ministry of Digital Transformation. Examples are given of the implementation of digital projects (superservices and e-systems) in the public administration sphere that have demonstrated practical effects – from increased transparency and budget savings to an improved business climate. It is emphasized that the digital transformation of the public sector has become the basis for its modernization and can significantly stimulate the development of an open information society, democracy, productivity, and an innovation-driven economy. The practical significance of the study lies in identifying promising directions for improving state economic development policy in the digital age and generalizing the experience of implementing institutional innovations, which can be used in developing strategic documents and reforms in the field of public administration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Maksym Sikalo, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4, Svobody Sq., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

PhD in public administration,
doctoral candidate at the department of economic policy and management,
Educational and Scientific Institute «Institute of Public Administration»,
V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4 Svobody Sq., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

References

ACAPS. (2025, June 5). Humanitarian access for people with disabilities in Ukraine. URL: https://www.acaps.org/fileadmin/Data_Product/Main_media/20250605_ACAPS_Ukraine_Humanitarian_access_for_people_with_disabilities.pdf

Axios. (2023, January 18). U.S. wants to help export Ukraine’s e-governance app to other countries. URL: https://www.axios.com/2023/01/18/ukraine-app-diia-other-countries-usaid

Ivano-Frankivsk Regional State Administration. (2025, August 21). CDTO Annual Forum 2025: A new stage of digital transformation and innovation in Ukraine. URL: https://www.if.gov.ua/news/cdto-annual-forum-2025-novyi-etap-tsyfrovoi-transformatsii-ta-innovatsii-v-ukraini

Center for Economic Strategy. (2025, March 4). Recovery procurement: 2024 summary (Policy brief). URL: https://ces.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/eng_brp-policy-brief-2025-feb26-.pdf

Defense One. (2023, May 23). In Ukraine, USAID created a blueprint for digital citizenship-now they’re exporting it. URL: https://www.defenseone.com/technology/2023/05/ukraine-usaid-created-blueprint-digital-citizenship-now-theyre-exporting-it/

Pathfinders (SDG16+). (2023, June 6). Digitalization of public procurement for transparency and financial inclusion in Tunisia. URL: https://www.sdg16.plus/policies/digitalization-of-public-procurement-for-transparency-and-financial-inclusion-in-tunisia/

Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). Digital era governance: IT corporations, the state, and e-government. Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/digital-era-governance-9780199547005

OECD Observatory of Public Sector Innovation. (2016, October 29). eProcurement system ProZorro. URL: https://oecd-opsi.org/innovations/eprocurement-system-prozorro/

EU4Ukraine. (2023, April 4). Diia.Signature complies with the eIDAS regulations. URL: https://eu4ukraine.eu/en/media-en/publications-en/dia-signature-complies-with-the-eidas-regulations-en.html

Financial Times. (2025). How Ukraine lost hundreds of millions on arms deals gone wrong. URL: https://www.ft.com/content/0bac7e00-1cd1-4874-aab7-011122752d9c

Global Voices. (2021, February 11). Security concerns and legal ambiguities threaten the future of Ukraine’s Diia. URL: https://globalvoices.org/2021/02/11/security-concerns-and-legal-ambiguities-threaten-the-future-of-ukraines-state-in-a-smartphone/

Grimsey, D., & Lewis, M. K. (2004). Public private partnerships: The worldwide revolution in infrastructure provision and project finance. Edward Elgar. https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/usd/public-private-partnerships-9781843766308.html

Hodge, G., & Greve, C. (2005). The challenge of public-private partnerships: Learning from international experience. Edward Elgar. https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/usd/the-challenge-of-public-private-partnerships-9781845428082.html

Hollands, R. G. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? City, 12(3), 303-320. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248930334

Interfax-Ukraine. (2023, May 24). Ministry of Digital Transformation considers partnership with Zambia, Colombia... URL: https://en.interfax.com.ua/news/general/912162.html

Interoperable Europe. (2025, July 31). Diia.Engine: Open-source low-code platform. URL: https://interoperable-europe.ec.europa.eu/collection/egovernment/solution/diiaengine-open-source-low-code-platform

Janowski, T. (2015). Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 221-236. URL: https://courses.edx.org/asset-v1:DelftX+OG101x+1T2016+type@asset+block/Paper_Tomasz_-_pre_publication_version.pdf

Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258-268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740

Kitchin, R. (2014). The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. SAGE. URL: https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/the-data-revolution/book241126

Transparent Public Procurement Rating. (n.d.). Kyrgyzstan: Country page. URL: https://www.tpp-rating.org/page/eng/country/kyrgyzstan

Mazzucato, M. (2013/2023). The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs. private sector myths (10th Anniversary ed.). Penguin / Allen Lane. URL: https://marianamazzucato.com/books/the-entrepreneurial-state

Meijer, A. (2016). Smart city governance: A local emergent perspective. In J. R. Gil-Garcia, T. A. Pardo, & T. Nam (Eds.), Smarter as the new urban agenda (pp. 73-85). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17620-8_4

Nestulia, V. (2019, December 11). Opening up Moldova’s contracts: Progress and challenges. Open Contracting Partnership. URL: https://www.open-contracting.org/2019/12/11/opening-up-moldovas-contracts-progress-and-challenges/

Noveck, B. S. (2009). Wiki government: How technology can make government better, democracy stronger, and citizens more powerful. Brookings Institution Press. URL: https://www.brookings.edu/books/wiki-government/

O’Reilly, T. (2011). Government as a platform. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 6(1), 13-40. https://doi.org/10.1162/INOV_a_00056

OECD. (2024). Enhancing resilience by boosting digital business transformation in Ukraine. OECD Publishing. URL: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2024/05/enhancing-resilience-by-boosting-digital-business-transformation-in-ukraine_c2e06e50/4b13b0bb-en.pdf

Open Contracting Partnership. (2024, May 23). How Ukraine’s procurement appeals tool Clarity App promotes fair competition. URL: https://www.open-contracting.org/2024/05/23/how-ukraines-procurement-appeals-tool-clarity-app-promotes-fair-competition/

Open Contracting Partnership, & Transparency International Ukraine. (2024, November 21). How to make better public procurement decisions with business intelligence (case study). URL: https://www.open-contracting.org/2024/12/04/how-to-make-better-public-procurement-decisions-with-business-intelligence-insights-from-ukraine/

Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis – Into the age of austerity (4th ed.). Oxford University Press. URL: https://global.oup.com/academic/product/public-management-reform-9780198795186

Open Contracting Partnership. (2022, June 29). Procurement: The missing puzzle piece to follow the money in Kyrgyz Republic. URL: https://www.open-contracting.org/2022/06/29/procurement-the-missing-puzzle-piece-to-follow-the-money-in-kyrgyz-republic/

Rosca, O. (2018, October 24). Moldova introduces eProcurement system MTender. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. URL: https://www.ebrd.com/home/news-and-events/news/2018/moldova-introduces-eprocurement-system-mtender.html

StateWatch. (2025, May 28). 2024 DOT procurement review: Analysis, challenges and recommendations. URL: https://statewatch.org.ua/en/publications/strong-2024-dot-procurement-review-analysis-challenges-and-recommendations-strong/

Townsend, A. M. (2013). Smart cities: Big data, civic hackers, and the quest for a new utopia. W. W. Norton. URL: https://wwnorton.com/books/9780393349789

34. Transparency International Ukraine. (2024, June 17). Government strengthens localization requirements: Changes for applicants and authorities. URL: https://ti-ukraine.org/en/news/government-strengthens-localization-requirements-changes-for-applicants-and-authorities/

35. Open Government Partnership. (2024). Tunisia action plan 2023-2025. URL: https://www.opengovpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Tunisia_Action-Plan_2023-2025_EN.pdf

Ukrinform. (2023, May 23). Colombia, Kosovo and Zambia to be first to implement Ukraine’s Diia – USAID chief. URL: https://www.ukrinform.net/rubric-economy/3713264-colombia-kosovo-zambia-to-be-first-to-implement-ukraines-diia-usaid-chief.html

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), & Kyiv International Institute of Sociology (KIIS). (2024, March). Use of public e-services in 2023: Omnibus survey. URL: https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/2024-03/undp_ukraine_-_e-services-usage-omnibus-2023_-_eng.pdf

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), & Kyiv International Institute of Sociology (KIIS). (2025, January). Opinions and views of the population of Ukraine on state e-services (2024). URL: https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/2025-01/undp-ua-e-services-use-2024-eng.pdf

World Bank. (2025, April 21, last updated). Digital transformation: Overview. URL: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/digital/overview

Yescombe, E. R. (2013). Public-private partnerships: Principles of policy and finance (2nd ed.). Elsevier. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780124157550/public-private-partnerships

Bakumenko, V. D. (2003). Teoretychni ta orhanizatsiino-metodychni zasady derzhavnoho upravlinnia. UADU. URL: http://shron1.chtyvo.org.ua/Bakumenko_Valerii/Teoretychni_ta_orhanizatsiino-metodychni_zasady_derzhavnoho_upravlinnia.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Vakulenko, V. M., Ihnatenko, O. S., Borshch, H. A., et al. (2012). Mizhmunitsypalne spivrobitnytstvo (Textbook). NADU; Feniks. URL: https://decentralization.ua/uploads/library/file/11/Organizatsiya-spivrobitnitstva-teritorialnih-gromad-v-Ukrayini.pdf [in Ukrainian].

European Commission. (2024, October 30). Ukraine report 2024. URL: https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/document/download/1924a044-b30f-48a2-99c1-50edeac14da1_en

European Business Association. (n.d.). Law of Ukraine No. 1977-IX (Dec 16, 2021) on localization in public procurement: Overview and requirements. URL: https://eba.com.ua/en/zakon-pro-lokalizatsiyu-vyrobnytstva-nabrav-chynnosti/

Motrenko, T. V. (Ed.). (2009). Istoriia derzhavnoi sluzhby v Ukraini (Vol. 5). Nika-Tsentr. URL: https://www.rada.gov.ua/uploads/documents/40772.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Ukrinform. (2024, December 31). Number of Diia users grew to almost 22 million – Shmyhal. URL: https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-society/3943653-kilkist-koristuvaciv-dii-zrosla-majze-do-22-miljoniv-smigal.html [in Ukrainian].

Knyazev, V. M. (2010). Problemy informatyzatsii derzhavnoho upravlinnia. Visnyk NADU. URL: https://visnyk-nadu.academy.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/2010-3-12.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Kovalenko, M., & Sikalo, M. (2023). Vplyv tsyfrovoi ekonomiky na transformatsiiu suspilnykh vidnosyn. Theory and Practice of Public Administration, 2(77), 83-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26565/1727-6667-2023-2-06 [in Ukrainian].

Kovalenko, M., & Sikalo, M. (2024). Rol tsyfrovizatsii u rozvytku publichnykh finansiv. Theory and Practice of Public Administration, 2(79), 217-242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26565/1727-6667-2024-2-11 [in Ukrainian].

Kuibida, V. S. (2004). Formuvannia mistsevoho samovriaduvannia v Ukraini: istoriia, teoriia, praktyka. Institute of Public Administration. URL: https://www.lvivacademy.com/vidavnitstvo_1/visnik9/fail/Kuibaida.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Markevych, K. L. (2021, September 6). Tsyfrovizatsiia: perevahy ta shliakhy podolannia vyklykiv. Razumkov Center. URL: https://razumkov.org.ua/statti/tsyfrovizatsiia-perevagy-ta-shliakhy-podolannia-vyklykiv [in Ukrainian].

Financial Club. (2024, April 26). UAH 42 billion saved through Prozorro procurements. URL: https://finclub.net/news/ochikuvana-vartist-zakupivel-cherez-prozorro-torik-zrosla-na-70protsent.html [in Ukrainian].

Nyzhnyk, N. R. (2001). On public administration: Object and subject of research. Contemporary Studies of Social Problems. URL: https://cslr.lnpu.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/1_1_1.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Obolenskyi, O. Yu., Vasina, A. Yu., & Melnyk, A. F. (2009). Public administration (Textbook). Znannia. URL: http://idu.at.ua/Kniga_Derzhavne_upravlinnya.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Oleshko, A. A. (2019). Key imperatives of public administration of digital development in Ukraine. State and Regions. Series: Public Administration, 3(67), 87–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32840/1813-3401-2019-3-16 [in Ukrainian].

Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (2022, October 12). Resolution No. 1178 “On approval of the specifics of public procurement under martial law”. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1178-2022-%D0%BF [in Ukrainian].

Rozputenko, I. V. (Ed.). (2002). Efficiency of public administration (Monograph). K.I.S. URL: https://www.twirpx.com/file/1218694/ [in Ukrainian].

Semenchenko, A. I. (2009). A comprehensive model of strategic planning in public administration of the national security sector. Strategic Panorama, 1, 56–66. URL: https://ipacs.knu.ua/pages/dop/336/files/304bfd79-0732-4b27-9bb5-f1cbebc643c1.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Serohin, S. M., Dehtiar, A. O., & Hornyk, V. H. (2019). Public service (Textbook). Dnipro Regional Institute for Public Administration of the National Academy for Public Administration. URL: https://academy.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/publichna-sluzhba.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Sikalo, M. V. (2025). From fragmentation to convergence: Theoretical architecture of transitive statehood in the digital age. State Formation, 1(37), 152–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26565/1992-2337-2025-1-11 [in Ukrainian].

Sikalo, M. V. (2025). A conceptual framework for public governance of socio-economic systems: From an instrumental to a substantive understanding of digital transformation. Actual Problems of Public Administration, 1(66), 67–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26565/1684-8489-2025-1-03 [in Ukrainian].

Sikalo, M. V. (2025). Digital statehood: A transitive model and the evolution of methodological paradigms of public governance. Theory and Practice of Public Administration, 1(80), 54–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26565/1727-6667-2025-1-04 [in Ukrainian].

Simakov, K. I., Valina, V. H., Launikonis, V. P., & Budovii, M. Yu. (2021). Features of public administration under the conditions of digital transformation of Ukraine. Economic Bulletin of Donbas, 1(63), 179–185 [in Ukrainian].

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2023, July 6). The Diia.City special regime operates and strengthens Ukraine’s economy – Parliamentary Committee on Digital Transformation (Press release). URL: https://www.rada.gov.ua/news/news_kom/242877.html [in Ukrainian].

Published
2025-12-31
How to Cite
Sikalo, M. (2025). Institutional-cognitive reconfiguration of public administration in the context of digital transformation: mechanisms for catalyzing innovation and the data economy. Theory and Practice of Public Administration, 2(81), 152-174. https://doi.org/10.26565/1727-6667-2025-2-09
Section
State Regulation of Economic and Social Development Processes