Determinants of corporatization in Togo: capital, credit, and sectoral disparities
Abstract
This article explores the determinants of corporatization in Togo, focusing on access to credit, capital, and the domain of operation. Corporatization aims to enhance efficiency, transparency, and financial performance of public enterprises by aligning them with private sector practices. This transformation is influenced by various economic, political, and institutional factors. The theories used to analyze these determinants include public choice theory, which examines the principal-agent relationships between policymakers and public enterprise managers, and transaction cost theory. The article employs a Probit model to assess the marginal effects of different explanatory variables on corporatization using data from the 2018 General Enterprise Census (RGE) in Togo. The results show that access to credit has a positive and significant marginal effect, suggesting that improved credit access is associated with increased corporatization. Similarly, capital has a positive effect, indicating that an increase in capital correlates with a rise in corporatization. However, the domain of operation shows a negative marginal effect, potentially reflecting sectoral disparities or specific conditions that negatively impact corporatization. The article concludes by emphasizing the importance of improving credit access and increasing capital to boost corporatization, while considering the specificities of different sectors. Policymakers and researchers should focus on targeted interventions to maximize the benefits of corporatization and attract foreign investments by creating a stable and regulated environment.
Downloads
References
Alayande, B., & Alayande, O. (2004). A quantitative and qualitative assessment of vulnerability to poverty in Nigeria. Paper presented at the CSAE Conference on poverty reduction, growth and human development in Africa.
Andrews, R., Clifton, J., & Ferry, L. (2022). Corporatization of public services. Public Administration, 100(2), 179‑192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12848
Ayyagari, M., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2011). Small vs. young firms across the world: Contribution to employment, job creation, and growth. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 5631.
Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2005). Growth theory through the lens of development economics. In Handbook of Economic Growth. 1, pp. 473‑552.
Claessens, S., & Djankov, S. (2002). Privatization benefits in Eastern Europe. Journal of Public Economics, 83(3), 307‑324.
De Mel, S., McKenzie, D., & Woodruff, C. (2008). Returns to capital in microenterprises: Evidence from a field experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(4), 1329‑1372.
Dorfman, D. D., & Alf Jr, E. (1969). Maximum-likelihood estimation of parameters of signal-detection theory and determination of confidence intervals—Rating-method data. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 6(3), 487‑496.
Dupas, P., & Robinson, J. (2013). Savings constraints and microenterprise development: Evidence from a field experiment in Kenya. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5(1), 163‑192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/app.5.1.163
Fafchamps, M., McKenzie, D., Quinn, S., & Woodruff, C. (2014). Microenterprise growth and the flypaper effect: Evidence from a randomized experiment in Ghana. Journal of Development Economics, 106, 211‑226.
Hanania, R. (2023). Worse than nothing: Why US intervention made government atrocities more likely in Syria. In Survival, October-November 2020: Pandemics and Politics (pp. 173‑192). Routledge.
Harris, A. S., Sigman, R., Meyer-Sahling, J.-H., Mikkelsen, K. S., & Schuster, C. (2020). Oiling the bureaucracy? Political spending, bureaucrats, and the resource curse. World Development, 127, 104745.
Khandker, S. R. (2005). Microfinance and poverty: Evidence using panel data from Bangladesh. The World Bank Economic Review, 19(2), 263‑286.
La Porta, R., & Shleifer, A. (2014). Informality and development. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(3), 109‑126.
Mallapragada, D. S., Junge, C., Wang, C., Pfeifenberger, H., Joskow, P. L., & Schmalensee, R. (2023). Electricity pricing challenges in future renewables-dominant power systems. Energy Economics, 126, 106981.
McKenzie, D., & Sakho, Y. S. (2010). Does it pay firms to register for taxes? The impact of formality on firm profitability. Journal of Development Economics, 91(1), 15‑24.
McKenzie, D., & Woodruff, C. (2014). What are we learning from business training and entrepreneurship evaluations around the developing world? The World Bank Research Observer, 29(1), 48‑82.
Minniti, M., & Naudé, W. (2010). What do we know about the patterns and determinants of female entrepreneurship across countries? The European Journal of Development Research, 22(3), 277‑293.
Nawai, N., & Shariff, M. N. M. (2012). Factors affecting repayment performance in microfinance programs in Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 806‑811.
Nordberg, D. (2021). Art in corporate governance: A Deweyan perspective on board experience. Philosophy of Management, 20(3), 337‑353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-020-00152-y
Psacharopoulos, G., & Patrinos, H. A. (2004). Returns to investment in education: A further update. Education Economics, 12(2), 111‑134. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964529042000239140
Scott, W. R. (2013). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. Sage Publications.
Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications: A study in the economics of internal organization. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.
Williamson, O. E. (2010). Transaction cost economics: An overview. In The Elgar Companion to Transaction Cost Economics.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
