Ensuring governance resilience and continuity of public service delivery in wartime and emergency conditions in Ukraine
Abstract
The article explores strategies for ensuring the resilience and continuity of public service delivery in Ukraine under martial law and prolonged crisis conditions. It analyzes best international practices for adapting public governance systems to extreme circumstances, drawing on the experiences of countries that have endured protracted military conflicts (Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Iraq, Afghanistan) as well as large-scale natural and technological disasters (Japan following the Fukushima-1 nuclear accident and New Zealand after a series of earthquakes). The study identifies key factors ensuring the resilience of public services, including proactive planning, decentralization of authority, digitalization of management processes, and innovative approaches to workforce management. The article highlights the primary challenges facing Ukraine’s public sector during wartime, such as the destruction of critical infrastructure, shortages of resources and personnel, and the need for rapid adaptation of regulatory mechanisms and procedures. A conceptual model for adapting Ukraine’s public governance system is proposed, comprising the prioritization of critical services, strengthening the autonomy of local governments, scaling up digital tools, establishing a flexible personnel management framework, and implementing new regulatory mechanisms. Special attention is given to the role of digitalization in maintaining public service accessibility amid the destructive impacts of armed conflict and fostering an inclusive approach to assisting affected communities. The research methodology is based on a systemic approach that enables a comprehensive assessment of challenges and opportunities for public service adaptation. The study employs theoretical and methodological analysis, case studies, comparative analysis of international practices, and content analysis of official reports from international organizations (World Bank, OECD, WFP) and Ukrainian government agencies. The findings demonstrate that the implementation of digital technologies, the development of local governance ecosystems, and the enhancement of public servants’ competencies are critical for ensuring the resilience of public services, maintaining public trust, and supporting institutional viability during prolonged crises. The proposed recommendations include strengthening decentralization, advancing the digitalization of administrative services, integrating crisis protocols into government operations, and fostering workforce capabilities aligned with contemporary challenges. The article offers both theoretical insights and practical guidance for modernizing public governance in Ukraine during wartime and in the post-war recovery period.
Downloads
References
Acemoglu, D., & Johnson, S. (2023). Power and Progress: Our Thousand-Year Struggle Over Technology and Prosperity. New York: PublicAffairs.
Ash, T., & Gunn, J. (2023). The Struggle for Ukraine: Chatham House Report. London: Chatham House.
Boin, A., Fahy, L. A., & ‘t Hart, P. (2021). Guardians of Public Value: How Public Organizations Become and Remain Institutions. In A. Boin, L. A. Fahy, & P. ‘t Hart (Eds.), Guardians of Public Value (pp. 1-20). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bozorgmehr, K., Biddle, L., Preussler, S., et al. (2018). Differences in pregnancy outcomes and obstetric care between asylum seeking and resident women: A cross-sectional study in a German federal state, 2010–2016. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 18:417. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-2053-1
Bustos, E. (2021). Organizational Reputation in the Public Administration: A Systematic Literature Review. Public Administration Review, 81(4), 731–751. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13363
European Parliament. (2023). Report on COVID-19 pandemic: lessons learned and recommendations for the future / Special Committee on the COVID-19 pandemic (2022/2076(INI)). URL: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2023-0217_EN.html
Faguet, J.-P., & Sánchez, F. (2014). Decentralization and access to social services in Colombia. Public Choice, 160(1/2), 227–249. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/24507645
Kaplan, S. (2021). Adapting government services in conflict-affected areas: Lessons from the COVID-19 response in Iraq. Public Administration Review, 81(5), 952–959. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13363
Kattel, R., & Mazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-oriented innovation policy and dynamic capabilities in the public sector. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27, 787–801. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty032
Kazuhisa, A. (2022). JICA’s Activities in Afghanistan. Asia-Pacific Review, 29(1), 70–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/13439006.2022.2055406
Koprić, I. (2019). Public Administration Reform in Croatia: Slow Modernization During Europeanization of Resilient Bureaucracy. Public Administration Issues, 5, 7–26. Retrieved from: https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/vgmu00/2019i5p7-26.html
Lindgren, I., & van Veenstra, A. (2021). Digital transformation of public services: A systematic literature review. Information Polity, 26(4), 469–493. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-211542
OECD. (2018). Good Jobs for All in a Changing World of Work: The OECD Jobs Strategy. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264308817-en
OECD. (2022). Building Trust and Reinforcing Democracy: Preparing the Ground for Government Action. OECD Public Governance Reviews. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/76972a4a-en
Profiroiu, A., & Nastacă, C. (2021). What strengthens resilience in public administration institutions? Eastern Journal of European Studies, 12, 100–125. https://doi.org/10.47743/ejes-2021-SI05
Ray, K., Ghimire, J., & Bc, R. K. (2019). Effects of Disaster on Primary Health Care in Low Income Countries. J Nepal Health Res Counc., 17(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.1688
Shephard, D., & Anne Ellersiek, A. (2021). Kingdon’s multiple streams approach in new political contexts: Consolidation, configuration, and new findings. Governance, 34(2), 523–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12521
The World Bank. (2022). Ukraine Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment. URL: http://surl.li/cmpgas
UNDP. (2024). Updated Ukraine Recovery and Reconstruction Needs Assessment. UNDP. URL: https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/2024-02/un_ua_rdna3_report_eng.pdf?sequence=1
WFP. (2022). WFP and Social Protection Annual Review 2022. Retrieved from: https://docs.wfp.org/api/documents/WFP-0000154910/download
WHO. (2017). Primary Health Care Systems (PRIMASYS): Case study from Sri Lanka. WHO. URL: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/341087/WHO-HIS-HSR-17.33-eng.pdf?sequence=1
Zanjani, L., Govan, H., Jonas, H., et al. (2023). Territories of life as key to global environmental sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 63, 20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101298
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).