Digitalization of Regional Economy as a Public Administration Approach in Stimulating Socio-Economic Development Regional of Ukraine

Keywords: public administration, sustainable development, state regional policy, digitalization, digital platform, digital ecosystem, state enterprises, regional development programs.

Abstract

The relevance of this study is determined by the need to form effective regional policy capable of ensuring balanced socio-economic development of the regions of Ukraine based on innovative-investment reproduction in the context of the fourth industrial revolution, increasing competition between territories, political instability, and social tension, as well as growing external and internal economic, social, military, environmental, and other threats and challenges.
A primary factor in the substantive content of public administration of regional development is the change in the goal-setting of territorial development and the principles of distributing economic resources among regions.
State regional policy of Ukraine should be aimed at improving the quality of life of the population, careful use of all regional resources, improving the structure of material production, and environmental improvement, stimulating innovation, and implementing new technologies. This system of guidelines implies the activation of the process of digitalization of the regional economy, which is based on the use of advanced innovative technologies permeating all stages of business processes, achievements of traditional science-intensive and intellectual sectors, as well as the modern experience of regional companies actively implementing innovative products and services. The transition of primary and supporting business processes to the digital space, training personnel in digital skills for working in the Internet information and telecommunication network, and shifting the labor process from material-technical factors to human ones are initial conditions for the successful digital transformation of the regional economy.
For Ukraine, there is an increasing need to develop the national economy by creating state enterprises that will effectively operate in both domestic and external markets. Such economic entities should become “locomotives” and “growth points” of the national economy, generating impulses and creating a multiplier effect to increase the economic activity of the private sector, development of high-tech industries, innovations, and more. This approach is closely linked to the state regional policy aimed at balanced regional development, particularly through supporting key enterprises that can become the foundation for economic growth in the regions. An important aspect of this policy is ensuring equal opportunities for regional development and reducing disparities between them.
The processes of digital transformation open up new opportunities for the development of both state and private enterprises, which can contribute to the activation of economic activity in the regions. In particular, digitalization allows for the optimization of management processes, easier access to markets and resources, as well as fostering innovation. Priority areas for regulating digital transformation of the regional economy by the state should include ensuring consumer rights, organizing a set of cybersecurity measures, and promoting online trade. These areas play a key role in developing business opportunities for representatives of the regional business community and protecting public interests, acting as multipliers to enhance economic activity and investment appeal of the regions.
The use of digital platforms can provide numerous advantages, including: stimulating innovation adoption, increasing productivity, creating new consumer values, expanding market opportunities, reducing transaction costs, improving communication, and enhancing overall well-being and quality of life. At the regional level, this can contribute to optimizing resource management, developing local economies, enhancing regional competitiveness, and ensuring more effective implementation of state programs and initiatives.
It is shown that the application of a digital ecosystem is of particular importance for public administration, as it allows for the creation of various incentives to support socio-economic development of the region. To attract participants to the digital ecosystem, appropriate incentives need to be developed. Such participation can not only contribute to financial results growth but also strengthen competitive advantages, enhance brand positions and organizational reputation, and improve resilience, productivity, and effectiveness, providing other non-financial benefits. Interaction with various digital platforms expands the boundaries of enterprises and operations of organizations, encouraging them to seek and utilize new opportunities beyond traditional areas of activity. This forms a new level of creating and providing value to consumers and improves the efficiency of local self-government bodies.
Consumer participation in the regional digital ecosystem allows not only saving money and time on acquiring necessary goods and services without intermediaries but also gaining new knowledge and competencies, enhancing status and self-esteem. It also contributes to a sense of social significance and belonging to the global network of interactions between people, organizations, and public authorities.
Measures for organizing the conversion of digital business platforms into a unified regional digital ecosystem have been developed.
The experience of China regarding the development of regional digital ecosystems is extremely valuable for Ukraine, as it illustrates effective strategies for integrating innovations and technologies aimed at increasing the resilience and competitiveness of regions. It also highlights the need for systemic reforms in organizing the economic system and state economic regulation. Such reforms are key to ensuring socio-economic development and for the successful adaptation and development of digital initiatives in Ukrainian regions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Mykola Kovalenko, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4 Svobody Sq, Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

Doctor of Science in Public Administration, Professor,
Professor of Economic Policy and Management Department,
Education and Research Institute of Public Administration,
V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4 Svobody Sq., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

Roman Sobol, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4 Svobody Sq, Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

Ph.D of Science оf Public Administration, Associate Professor,
Associate Professor of the Public Policy Department, Education and Research Institute
of Public Administration, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University,
4 Svobody Sq., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

Yana Vanina, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4 Svobody Sq, Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

PhD in Public Administration, Аssociate Professor, Аssociate Professor
of Economic Policy and Management Department, Education and Research Institute of Public Administration, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4 Svobody Sq., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

Viktoriia Berlizova, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4 Svobody Sq, Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

PhD in Public Administartion, senior lecturer of the Economic Policy and Management Department, Education and Research Institute of Public Administration, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4 Svobody Sq., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

Mariіa Sobol, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, st. Volodymyrska, 60, Kyiv, 01033, Ukraine

2nd year student of the Faculty of Economics of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, st. Volodymyrska, 60, Kyiv, 01033, Ukraine

References

Birkovych, T. I., Birkovych, V. I., & Kabanets, O. S. (2019). Public administration mechanisms in the field of digital transformations. Public Administration: Improvement and Development, 9. URL: http://www.dy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=1488 [in Ukrainian] (accessed 08.04.2024)

Vyshnevskyi, O. S. (2021). Digital platformization of the process of strategizing the development of the national economy. Kyiv: National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Institute of Industrial Economics [in Ukrainian].

Datsiі, N. V. (2013). Investment security of innovative economic development. In M. A. Khvesyk (Ed.), Innovation-Investment and Technological Security of Regional Economic Systems Transformation: A Monograph. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka, 177-236 [in Ukrainian].

Varnalii, Z. S. (Ed.). (2007). State regional policy of Ukraine: Features and strategic priorities. Kyiv: NISD [in Ukrainian].

Zhalilo, Y. A. (Ed.). (2020). Decentralization and the formation of regional development policy in Ukraine. Kyiv: NISD. URL: https://niss.gov.ua/sites/default/files/2020-09/decentralizatsiya-i-formuvannya-polityky-regionalnogo-rozvytku-v-ukraini_0.pdf [in Ukrainian] (accessed 08.04.2024).

Dorokhovskyi, O. M., & Radziievskyi, O. I. (2019). Features of stimulating socio-ecological-economic development of regions. Efficient Economy, 2. URL: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=7337. DOI: 10.32702/2307-2105-2019.2.16 [in Ukrainian] (accessed 08.04.2024).

Dunaiev, I. V., & Kovalenko, M. M. (2022). New trajectories for regulating information platforms and platform economies for public good. Actual Problems of Public Administration, 2(61), 6-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26565/1684-8489-2022-2-01 [in Ukrainian] (accessed 08.04.2024).

Dunaiev, I. V., & Orlov, O. V. (2023). National legal regulation of the digital economy and information platforms. Actual Problems of Public Administration, 1 (62), 6-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26565/1684-8489-2023-1-01 [in Ukrainian] (accessed 08.04.2024).

Dunaiev, I., Kud, A., Latynin, M., Kosenko, A., Kosenko, V., & Kobzev, I. (2021). Improving methods for assessing the results of digitization of public corporations. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6 (13-114), 17-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.248122 [in Ukrainian] (accessed 08.04.2024).

Yepifanov, A. O., & Salo, I. V. (1999). Regional economics: A textbook. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka [in Ukrainian].

Kachnyi, O. S. (2018). Ways to improve the planning system of socio-economic development of regions. Investments: Practice and Experience, 4, 109-111 [in Ukrainian].

Kovalenko, M., & Sikalo, M. (2023). The impact of the digital economy on the transformation of social relations. Theory and Practice of Public Administration, 2 (77), 83-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26565/1727-6667-2023-2-06 [in Ukrainian] (accessed 08.04.2024).

Constitution of Ukraine (1996). Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 30, Article 141. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text [in Ukrainian] (accessed 08.04.2024).

Latynin, M. A. (2018). Theoretical foundations of public administration of regional development. Scientific Bulletin: Public Administration, 1, 57-66. URL: https://nvdu.undicz.org.ua/index.php/nvdu/article/view/11/7 [in Ukrainian].

Mamatova, T. V., & Chikarenko, I. A. (2023). Sustainable development of territories and communities in Ukraine: Opportunities for applying international ISO standards. International economic relations: sustainable development of Ukraine in the context of globalization and European economic integration: problems, prospects, efficiency (pp. 138-143). URL: https://repository.kpi.kharkov.ua/handle/KhPI-Press/73855 [in Ukrainian] (accessed 08.04.2024).

Vakulenko, V. M., & Orlatyi, M. K. (Eds.). (2012). Fundamentals of regional governance in Ukraine: A textbook. Kyiv: NADU [in Ukrainian].

Piharev, Y., & Kosteniuk, N. (2021). Digitalization of public administration as a factor in the digital transformation of Ukraine. Actual Problems of Public Administration, 2 (83), 92-96. URL: http://uran.oridu.odessa.ua/article/view/237257 [in Ukrainian] (accessed 08.04.2024).

On the Principles of State Regional Policy: Law of Ukraine No. 156-VIII. (2015). Updated on June 27, 2024. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/156-19#Text [in Ukrainian] (accessed 08.04.2024).

On the Approval of the User Manual of the Unified Digital Integrated Information and Analytical System for Managing the Reconstruction Process of Real Estate, Construction, and Infrastructure Objects. Order of the State Agency for Restoration and Infrastructure Development of Ukraine No. H-583. (2023). URL: https://ips.ligazakon.net/document/FN080752 [in Ukrainian] (accessed 08.04.2024).

On the Implementation of the Experimental Project for the Creation, Implementation, and Functioning of the Unified Digital Integrated Information and Analytical System for Managing the Reconstruction Process of Real Estate, Construction, and Infrastructure Objects: Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 1286. (2022). Updated on May 5, 2023. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1286-2022-%D0%BF#Text (Accessed 20 June 2024) [in Ukrainian] (accessed 08.04.2024).

Bila, S. O., et al. (2013). Stimulating economic growth at the local level. Kyiv: NISD [in Ukrainian].

Khomyshyn, I. (2022). Directions of digital transformation in the public sphere: Legal foundations. Bulletin of the National University «Lviv Polytechnic», Series: Legal Sciences, 3(35), 233-239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23939/law2022.35.233 [in Ukrainian] (accessed 08.04. 2024)

Dream URC. (n.d.). Digital ecosystem for accountable reconstruction management. URL: https://dream.gov.ua/ua [in Ukrainian] (accessed 08.04.2024).

Chae, B. K. (2019). A general framework for studying the evolution of the digital innovation ecosystem: The case of big data. International Journal of Information Management, 45, 83–94. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10477 (accessed 08.04.2024).

Chen, H., & Cai, S. (2023). Research on evaluation and influencing factors of regional digital innovation ecosystem resilience—Empirical research based on panel data of 30 provinces and cities in China. Sustainability, 15(10), 10477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310477 (accessed 08.04.2024).

Easterly, W. (2003). Can foreign aid buy growth? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(3), 23–48

Gavkalova, N., Avedyan, L., Akimov, O., Akimova, L., & Belyavtseva, V. (2023). The effectiveness of the development of territories in the state regional system politicians. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 4(51), 333–344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.4.51.2023.4116 (accessed 08.04.2024).

Greenwood, D. T., & Holt, R. P. F. (2010). Local economic development in the 21st century. Armonk and London: M. E. Sharpe

Jaffee, D. (1998). Levels of socio-economic development theory. Westport and London: Praeger

Ke, R., Lin, Y., Yu, Y., Zhang, Y., & Radziwon, A. (2021). Exploring regional innovation ecosystems: An empirical study in China. Industry and Innovation, 28(5), 545–569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2020.1830042 (accessed 08.04.2024)

Kovalenko, M., Ziuz, D., Smihunova, O., Bondar, N., & Omelchenko, H. (2020). Implementation of state economic policy under corporatocracy: Financial and credit aspect. Public Policy and Administration, 3, 36–47. hURL: ttps://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=903511 (accessed 08.04.2024).

Moyer, K., & Burton, B. (n.d.). Three styles of digital business platforms. Gartner Research. URL: https://www.gartner.com/en (accessed 08.04.2024).

Perroux, F. (1950). The quarterly journal of economics, 64(1), 89–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1881960 (accessed 08.04.2024).

Schuh, G., Anderl, R., Gausemeier, J., Ten Hompel, M., & Wahlster, W. (2017). Industrie 4.0 maturity index. Munich: Herbert Utz Verlag [in Germany].

Schumpeter, J., & Backhaus, U. (2003). The theory of economic development. In J. A. Schumpeter (Ed.), The theory of economic development (pp. 61–116). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48082-4_3 (accessed 08.04.2024).

OECD (2024). Society at a glance 2024: OECD social indicators. URL: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/society-at-a-glance-2024_918d8db3-en.html (accessed 08.04.2024).

Stolterman, E., & Croon Fors, A. (2004). Information systems research: Relevant theory and informed practice. Springer.

Todaro, M., & Smith, S. (2011). Economic development (11th ed.). Pearson Education and Addison-Wesley.

Wallerstein, I. (1996). Underdevelopment and its remedies. In S. C. Chew & R. A. Denemark (Eds.), The underdevelopment of development (pp. 361). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Published
2024-06-27
How to Cite
Kovalenko, M., Sobol, R., Vanina, Y., Berlizova, V., & Sobol, M. (2024). Digitalization of Regional Economy as a Public Administration Approach in Stimulating Socio-Economic Development Regional of Ukraine. Theory and Practice of Public Administration, 1(78), 70-99. https://doi.org/10.26565/1727-6667-2024-1-05
Section
State Regulation of Economic and Social Development Processes