Problems and Opportunities of Blockchain Technologies Implementation in Public Authorities

Keywords: public administration, public authorities, blockchain, blockchain technologies, public sector, digital technologies, Web3 technologies.

Abstract

Blockchain is one of the most innovative technologies that is currently used in many areas as part of the spread of web3 technologies. Although the origins of blockchain are linked to the emergence of cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, today’s application of blockchain technology focuses on a wider range of issues where trust is required for a large number of transactions. For this reason, many researchers today believe that these technologies have great potential for use in the public sector. The public sector can use these technologies to fulfill its role as a generator of innovation and progress, which is part of its responsibilities, and to modernize projects that will enable citizens to receive the services they need.
Therefore, this work aims to determine the main factors of success or failure in the implementation of blockchain technology in public authorities based on the analysis of existing experience in this area, in particular, in EU member states.
Blockchain has proven useful for government agencies for several reasons. First, blockchain is a technology characterized by the ability to generate trust in information and processes in a heterogeneous context with a large number of participants and users. Second, blockchain facilitates governance by leaving no traces and acts as a tool to promote transparency, as it allows people to know who did what and when. Third, it eliminates the need for a centralized certificate authority to control access and use of services by large groups of people. Fourth, the successful development of blockchain-based systems can lead to significant cost savings.
However, the analysis shows that authorities are not yet ready to widely use and offer blockchain-based services. In many cases, a lack of understanding of the benefits and opportunities, as well as a still unclear interpretation of the legal and regulatory environment, prevent senior executives from making decisions that may involve greater risk. With this in mind, we believe that the implementation of blockchain technology in the public sector can be facilitated by the implementation of blockchain systems as a complement to existing tracking and transparency systems and processes, as well as increasing their efficiency while simultaneously reducing the cost of services provided. This will require the development of adaptive management structures in public institutions aimed at developing reasonable and acceptable solutions to solve real problems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Viacheslav Dziundziuk, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4 Svobody Sq, Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

Doctor of Science in Public Administration, Professor,
Head of Public Policy Chair, Educational and Scientific Institute «Institute of Public Administration»,
V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

Boris Dziundziuk, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4 Svobody Sq, Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

Candidate of Science in Public Administration,
Educational and Scientific Institute «Institute of Public Administration»,
V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

References

López-Zambrano, C.R., Camberos-Castro, M., & Villarreal-Peralta, E.M. (2021). The determinants of trust and perceived risk on bitcoin users. Retos/Revista de Ciencias de la Administración y Economía, vol. 11, n. 22, 199-215.

Valdavida, M. C. (2019). Blockchain in public sector, an international view. Revista Vasca de Gestión de Personas y Organizaciones Públicas, n. 16, 20–29.

Tan, E., Mahula, S., & Vrompvoets, J. (2021). Blockchain governance in the public sector: A conceptual framework for public management. Government Information Quarterly. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101625

Lindman, J. (2020). The uncertain promise of blockchain for government. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, Paris, OECD Publishing. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1787/d031cd67-en

Gartner, A. (2021). Hype Cycle for Blockchain. Retrieved from: https://www.gartner.com/interactive/hc/4003463?ref=solrAll&refval=325005556

Renteria, N., Wilson, T., & Strohecker, K. (2021). In a world first, El Salvador makes bitcoin legal tender. Reuters, 06.09. Retrieved from: https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/el-salvador-approves-first-law-bitcoin-legal-te nder-2021-06-09

Howcroft E. (2021). Digital-only artwork fetches nearly $70 million at Christie’s. Reuters. Retrieved from: www.reuters.com/article/us-auction-christie-s-nft-idUS

Bitcoin Clean Energy Initiative memo (2021). Retrieved from: https://squareup.com/us/en/press/bcei- white-paper

Naqvi, N., Hussain, M. (2020). Evidence-Based Blockchain: Findings form a Global Study of Blockchain Projects and Start-up Companies. The Journal of The British Blockchain Association, September. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.31585/jbba-3-2-(8)2020

Alvrilionis, D., Hardjono, T. (2021) Towards Blockchain-enabled Open Architectures for Scalable Digital Asset Platforms. ArXiv, 24 Oct. Retrieved from: https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.12553

Schrepel, T. (2021). Smart Contracts and the Digital Single Market Through the Lens of a ‘Law + Technology’ Approach. European Commission. Retrieved from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3947174

Ragnedda, M., Destefanis, G. (2019). Blockchain and Web 3.0: Social, Economic, and Technological Challenges. London: Routledge.

Buterin, V. (2017). The meaning of decentralization. Medium.com. Retrieved from: https://medium.com/@VitalikButerin/the-meaning-of-decentralization-a0c92b76a274

Antonopoulos, A. (2020). Official Twitter account. Retrieved from: https://twitter.com/aantonop/status/1257319103527698434

Bodó, B., Giannopoulou A. (2019). The Logics of Technology Decentralization - The Case of Distributed Ledger Technologies. Retrieved from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3330590

Mashaw, J. L. (2006). Accountability and Institutional Design: Some Thoughts on the Grammar of Governance. In Public Accountability, Designs, Dilemmas and Experiences, edited by Michael W. Dowdle (pp. 115-156). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lessig, L. (2000). Code Is Law: On Liberty in Cyberspace. Harvard Magazine, No. 1. Retrieved from: https://harvardmaga zine.com/2000/01/code-is-law-html

Werbach, K. (2018). The blockchain and the new architecture of trust. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Published
2022-12-29
How to Cite
Dziundziuk, V., & Dziundziu, B. (2022). Problems and Opportunities of Blockchain Technologies Implementation in Public Authorities. Theory and Practice of Public Administration, 2(75), 7-21. https://doi.org/10.26565/1727-6667-2022-2-01
Section
The Development of Public Administration System in Ukraine