THE TRANSDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH OF POLITICS, OR THE PHILOSOPHY AS THE EXPERIMENTAL ADVENTURE

  • Mykyta Trachuk PhD Student of the Department of Theoretical and Practical Philosophy named after Professor Y. B. Shad, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2558-3819
Keywords: transdisciplinarity, political philosophy, experimental philosophy, theoria, logic of the included third, metaphilosophy

Abstract

This article offers a philosophical elaboration of the transdisciplinary approach to the study of politics, framing it as a complex cultural and ontological phenomenon that calls for a rethinking of both philosophy itself and the foundations of scientific knowledge. The author argues that traditional interdisciplinary frameworks, though epistemically fruitful, are insufficient to capture the full multidimensionality of the political — a field where logical, aesthetic, linguistic, religious, corporeal, and sacral dimensions of being intersect. Therefore, political philosophy must unfold as a transdisciplinary endeavor that does not merely cross

disciplinary boundaries but transforms the very structure of cognition, situating the philosopher as a participant in a living knowledge process — in vivo. In this sense, politics ceases to be a static object of analysis and becomes a situation of existential insight, requiring critical openness and a capacity to think through the logic of the included middle. Drawing on the ideas of J. Piaget, B. Nicolescu, J. Brenner, and L. Greenacre, as well as the philosophical heritage of Plato, Aristotle, Dante, and Aquinas, the article traces the historical continuity of transdisciplinary political thought. Special emphasis is placed on critiquing the naturalist assumptions in Nicolescu’s theory and supplementing them with alternatives from philosophy of language (Wittgenstein, Austin), analytical logic, phenomenology, and possible worlds semantics. The article highlights the relevance of non-classical logics (particularly the logic of the included middle) as philosophical tools for engaging with ontological pluralism. It also examines the intersections between transdisciplinary political philosophy and fields such as holist epistemology, actor-network theory, transdisciplinary management, and experimental philosophy. Transdisciplinarity is envisioned as a heuristic journey — a theoria — which is both a mode of being and a mode of reflection, wherein philosophical discourse becomes an experimental construct. In this perspective, politics is no longer reducible to ideology or managerial technique, but is rediscovered as a transcendental-phenomenological event wherein the subjectivity of the researcher is situated on the threshold between worlds. The article concludes by reflecting on the significance of transdisciplinary vision for engaging with the European intellectual tradition in the context of civilizational crisis marked by postmodern relativism, technocratic reductionism, and emergent forms of authoritarianism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Rostoka, M. (2020). Transdisciplinary Approach in the Education System of Ukraine (part 1). Analytical review, 12. pp. 30-48. (in Ukraine)

Tytar, O. V. (2021). The role of transdisciplinary dialogue in the modern information society. Bulletin of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: Theory of Culture and Philosophy of Science, 62, pp. 15–19. https://doi.org/10.26565/2306-6687-2020-62-02 (in Ukraine)

Tytar, O. V. (2019). Transdisciplinarity and the "Knowledge Society" in the development of contemporary national philosophy of science. Humanities Journal, (2), pp. 13–21. https://doi.org/10.32620/gch.2019.2.02 (in Ukraine)

Trachuk, M. (2024). Invention of politics: between agonistic rhetoric and polemical dialectic. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series Philosophy. Philosophical Peripeteias, (71), 97-110. https://doi.org/10.26565/2226-0994-2024-71-08 (in Ukraine)

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962. 174 p.

Boichenko, M. (2019) Philosophical Position: Academic Neutrality Through Engagement with Academic Truth. Philosophical dialogues, 2019 (17-18). pp. 46-57.

Brenner, J. E. (2010). The philosophical logic of Stephane Lupasco (1900 – 1988). Logic and Logical Philosophy, 19(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2010.009

Brenner, J. E. (2014). Logic, science and the problem of complexity. Foundations of Science, 19(2), 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-013-9336-7

Brenner, J. E. (2017a). Linking the Tao, biomathics and information through the logic of energy. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 131, pp. 15-33. Retrieved from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0079610717300792; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2017.08.006

Brenner, J. E. (2017b). The transdisciplinary logic of Stéphane Lupasco for the understanding of complex systems. In M. A. Rodrigues, F. P. da Silva, & R. A. C. da Silva (Eds.), Dynamical systems, chaos and applications (pp. 37–58). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63082-3_3

Brenner, J. E. (2019). Transdisciplinarity, complexity, and the included middle. In I. Licata & L. Chiatti (Eds.), Logic of quantum mechanics: From quantum information to quantum cognition (pp. 35–51). World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813276897_0003

Brenner, J. & Wang, Z. (2023). On Middles and Thirds. Computer Sciences Mathematic Forum, 2023, 8(1), 4; https://doi.org/10.3390/cmsf2023008004

Chornomordenko, D. (2015). Contemporary ecology and the transdisciplinary methodology of investigations. Hylea: scientific review, 97. pp. 247-252.

DeRoo, N. (2022). The Political Logic of Experience: Expression in Phenomenology. Fordham University Press. 240 p. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781531500078; https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9781531500047.001.0001; https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2j56zcz

Greenacre, L. (2024). The Politics of Transdisciplinarity. World Futures, 80(4), 348–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2024.2330253

Husserl, E. (2002). Zur phänomenologischen Reduktion. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1926–1935). Springer / Husserliana 34. 320 S. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0574-6

Hadot, P. (1995). Philosophy as a Way of Life. Edited by Arnold I. Davidson and translated by Michael Chase. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing. 660p.

Knobe, J., & Nichols, S. (2017). Experimental Philosophy. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2017 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Retrieved from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/experimental-philosophy/

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press. 311 p. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001

McGregor, S. L. T. (2023). Transdisciplinarity and Public Policy. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 14. https://doi.org/10.22545/2023/00219

Nicolescu, B. (2003). Definition of Transdisciplinarity. Retrieved from: http://www.caosmose.net/candido/unisinos/textos/textos/nicolescu1.pdf

Nicolescu, B. (2010). Methodology of Transdisciplinarity – Levels of Reality, Logic of the Included Middle and Complexity. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, Vol. 1, N. 1, pp. 19-38.

Ono, H. et al. (2017). Philosophical Logic: Current Trends in Asia. Retrieved from: https://www.academia.edu/110112608/Philosophical_Logic_Current_Trends_in_Asia

Rigolot, C. (2020). Transdisciplinarity as a discipline and a way of being: complementarities and creative tensions. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7, 100. Retrieved from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-020-00598-5; https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00598-5

Schmidt, L., Falk, T., Siegmund-Schultze, M., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2020). The objectives of stakeholder involvement in transdisciplinary research: A conceptual framework for a reflective and reflexive practice. Ecological Economics, 176, 106751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106751

Sha Xin Wei (2013). Poiesis and Enchantment in Topological Matter. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 384 p. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262019514.001.0001

Published
2025-07-06
Cited
How to Cite
Trachuk, M. (2025). THE TRANSDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH OF POLITICS, OR THE PHILOSOPHY AS THE EXPERIMENTAL ADVENTURE . The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series "Theory of Culture and Philosophy of Science", (71), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.26565/2306-6687-2025-71-03