LABOR MARKET CHALLENGES AND ITS IMPACT ON THE «NEW POOR»
Abstract
At the current stage of the country’s socio-economic development, overcoming unemployment, poverty and ensuring effective employment in Georgia remains the main task of macroeconomic policy. Despite the recent reforms and certain positive shifts in economic development, there are still a number of difficulties in the labor market, which, on the one hand, are related to the shortage of jobs across the country, and on the other hand, to the shortage of highly qualified labor. In addition, there is a noticeable lack of personnel with the necessary knowledge, skills and experience in certain professions or specialties. This largely determines the imbalance between the demand and supply of labor in the Georgian labor market. The problem is made even more visible by modern global trends related to demographic, organizational, structural changes, large-scale labor emigration, technological innovations and other innovations.
Given the above situation, great importance is attached to systematic research of the labor market, especially in the direction of studying the real demand for labor, so that the existing higher and vocational education system in the country is correctly oriented towards training personnel with the appropriate profession and qualifications, which will fully meet the requirements of employers for the labor force and minimize the imbalance in the labor market. Eliminating the existing problem can have a positive impact on overcoming poverty, especially in relation to the “new poor”.
Poverty research is complex in nature and takes into account all the achievements that have taken place in economic, political, sociological and psychological scientific directions, which reveals the interdisciplinary nature of poverty research. This paper presents an analysis of the practical and theoretical approaches related to the study of the problem of poverty in socio-economic science.
At the current stage of the country’s socio-economic development, overcoming unemployment, poverty and ensuring effective employment remain the main tasks of macroeconomic policy in Georgia. Despite the recent reforms and certain positive shifts in the direction of economic development, there are still a number of difficulties in the economy, which, on the one hand, are related to the shortage of jobs across the country, and on the other hand, to the shortage of highly qualified labor. In addition, there is a noticeable lack of personnel with the necessary knowledge, skills and experience in certain professions or specialties. This largely determines the imbalance between the demand and supply of labor in the Georgian labor market. The problem is made even more visible by modern global trends related to demographic, organizational, structural changes, large-scale labor emigration, technological innovations and other innovations.
In modern economic relations, the impact of the functioning of the labor market on the “new poor” is relevant, which is explained primarily by the fact that in many cases employment cannot provide adequate living conditions for an individual. Poverty in its essence is a global challenge. At the same time, poverty is characterized by a subjective nature, which means that it is perceived differently by everyone. There may be different answers to the question of what poverty means: for someone it is associated with a lack of food, for someone with the absence of shelter, and for someone it may be associated with the possibility of receiving quality education. For some, it may be associated only with health.
Downloads
References
Ehrenberg, R. J., & Smith, R. S. (2022). Modern Labor Economics. Twelfth edition. Tbilisi: Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University Publishing House. Retrieved from https://tsu.ge/assets/media/files/7/biblioteka/%E1%83%97%E1%83%90%E1%83%9C%E1%83%90%E1%83%9B%E1%83%94%E1%83%93%E1%83%A0%E1%83%9D%E1%83%95%E1%83%94%20%E1%83%A8%E1%83%A0%E1%83%9D%E1%83%9B%E1%83%98%E1%83%A1%20%E1%83%94%E1%83%99%E1%83%9D%E1%83%9C%E1%83%9D%E1%83%9B%E1%83%98%E1%83%99%E1%83%90%202022.pdf. (In Georgian)
Tsartsidze, M., & Latsabidze, N. (2023). Labor market and trends in labor demand changes in Georgia in the context of the modern global crisis. 2020. Conference Proceedings: “The World Economy in the Post-Pandemic Period: Implications and Challenges” (pp. 303-313). Tbilisi. Retrieved from https://dspace.tsu.ge/server/api/core/bitstreams/26b77fa6-246e-4e2d-8ae9-5dde62321cdf/content. (In Georgian)
Arnania-Kepuladze, T., & Kepuladze, G. (2017). Economic Inequality and Poverty in Individual and Global Contexts. International Scientific Internet Conference "Economy – 21st Century". Retrieved from http://conferenceconomics.tsu.ge/?mcat=0&cat=arq&leng=ge&adgi=225&tit. (In Georgian)
Abesadze, R. (2013). Standard of Living, Poverty and Unemployment in Georgia. http://conferenceconomics.tsu.ge/doc/2019%20%20Internet%20Conference.pdf. (In Georgian)
Diakonidze, A. (2021). Non-standard and Informal Employment – Concepts and Their Relevance for Georgia. Retrieved from https://socialjustice.org.ge/uploads/products/pdf/Non-Standard_and_Informal_Employment__1637230489.pdf
Tsintsadze, G. (2021). The needs of those involved in non-standard and informal work: a thematic study. G. Tsintsadze, G. Lanchava, S. Shubladze, A. Diakonidze, S. Kajaia, & T. Keburia (Eds.), Informal and Non-Standard Distance in Georgia (pp. 32-46). Tbilisi: Center for Social Justice.
Kakulia, M., Kapanadze, N., & Kurkhuli, L. (2017). Chronic Poverty and Income Inequality in Georgia. Tbilisi: Friedrich Ebert Foundation.
Papava, Vl. (2015). Georgian Economy (Reforms and Pseudo-Reforms). Tbilisi: Intellect Publishing House.
Abesadze, R. (2022). The main directions of the Innovation Development Strategy of the Georgian Economy. Ekonomisti, XVIII(2), 8-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.36172/EKONOMISTI.2022.XVIII.02.RAMAZ.ABESADZE (In Georgian)
Abuselidze, G. (2019). European Integration of Georgia and Financial-Economic Condition: Achievements and Challenges. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(1), 53. doi: https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2019.v8n1p53
Arnania-Kepuladze, T., Dali, S., & Kepuladze, G. (2021, Oct 15). Labor Market: The Covid-19 Pandemic and Working Poverty. FBIM Transactions, 9(2), 1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.12709/fbim.09.09.02.01
Vooren, M., Healermans, C., Groot, W., & Maassen, H. (2018). The effectiveness of active labor market policies: a meta-analysis. Journal of economic surveys, 33(1), 125-149. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12269
Azar, J., Marinescu, I., & Steinbaum, M. (April 2022). Labor Market Concentration. Journal of Human Resources, 57, (S) S167-S199. doi: https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.monopsony.1218-9914R1
Zarifhonarvar, A. (2024). Economics of ChatGPT: a labor market view on the occupational impact of artificial intelligence. Journal of Electronic Business & Digital Economics, 3(2), 100-116. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEBDE-10-2023-0021
Bradley, J., & Mann, L. (November 2024). Learning about labor markets. Journal of Monetary Economics, 148, 103612. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2024.103612
Brunow, S., Lösch, S. & Okhrin, O. (2022). Labor market tightness and individual wage growth: evidence from Germany. J Labour Market Res, 56, 16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12651-022-00322-7
Donovan, K., & Scoellman, T. (2023). The role of labor market frictions in structural transformation. Oxford Development Studies. Oxford Development Studies, 51(4). doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2023.2276702
Bousrih, J., Elhaj, M., & Hassan, F. (2022). The labor market in the digital era: What matters for the Gulf Cooperation Council countries? Front. Sociol., Sec. Work, Employment and Organizations, 7. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2022.959091
Deming, D. J. (2015). The Growing Importance of Social Skills in the Labor Market. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper, 21473. doi: https://doi.org/10.3386/w21473
David, H. (2001). Wiring the Labor Market. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(1), 25–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.15.1.25
Corbin, J. (1920). The New Poor and the Old. The North American Review, 212(780), 618–630. doi: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25151112
Castañeda, A., Doan, D., Newhouse, D., Nguyen, M. C., Uematsu, H., & Azevedo, J. P. (2018). A new profile of the global poor. World Development, 101, 250-267. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.08.002
Narayan, A. (2020). Profiles of the new poor due to the COVID19 pandemic. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347720628_Profiles_of_the_new_poor_due_to_the_COVID19_pandemic?enrichId=rgreqb49c2415de2115989833605dd1d9285bXXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzM0NzcyMDYyODtBUzo5NzE5MzU1MDg4NzczMTNAMTYwODczODg5MTg3MQ%3D%3D&el=1_x_2&_esc=publicationCoverPdf
OECD/ILO. (2019). Tackling Vulnerability in the Informal Economy. Paris: Development Centre Studies, OECD Publishing. doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/939b7bcd-en
Schoukens, P., & Barrio, A. (2017). The changing concept of work: When does typical work become atypical? European Labour Law Journal, 8(4), 306-332. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2031952517743871

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.