Temporal Prospects of Persons with Restrictive Quarantine Conditions: Sex and Age Analysis
Abstract
The paper presents a theoretical and empirical study of gender and age characteristics of the content of time perspectives of persons who are in restrictive conditions of quarantine. Theoretical substantiation of the importance of forming a coordinated time perspective of the individual for its integration into the social system, includes an analysis of the structural and functional purpose and typological characteristics of time perspectives. The regulatory content of the time-space continuum of the personality in the conditions of deprivation is emphasized and the restrictive conditions of quarantine in the signs of multifunctional deprivation are outlined, which determine the content of the time perspective of the subjects of self-isolation. The purpose of the presented material is a theoretical and empirical study of gender and age characteristics of the content of time perspectives of persons who are in the restrictive conditions of quarantine and substantiation of signs of their life balance. Based on the analysis and theoretical generalization of the problem, a program of individual-oriented survey of persons in self-isolation in connection with the pandemic COVID-19, which includes testing methods and a set of methods for mathematical processing of results. Gender and age differences in the time perspectives of persons in restrictive quarantine conditions were noted: men of all ages are determined by the dominance of the time perspective of the hedonistic-fatalistic present, colored in men from 25 to 50 years by the characteristics of the negative past and transcendent future; and in men over 50 - the characteristics of the transcendent future; women (age range up to 50 years) are determined by the dominance of the time perspective of the future direction, and women over 50 years - the dominance of the time perspective of the negative past. The absence of signs of vital balance of the identified profiles of time perspectives is proved and the main vectors of formation of the optimal profile of time perspective are outlined: the vector of actualization of the future for males and the vector of activation of the present for the studied women.
Downloads
References
Abulkhanova-Slavskaya, K.A. (1991). Стратегия жизни [Life strategy]. Moscow: Myisl. (in Russian).
Antsyferova, L.I. (1994). Личность в трудных жизненных условиях: переосмисливание, преобразование ситуации и психологическая защита [Personality in difficult living conditions: rethinking, transforming the situation and psychological defense]. Psychological Journal. 1. 3-18. (in Russian).
Apter, M. J. (1982). The experience of motivation: The theory of psychological reversals. L.N.Y.: Academic Press.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. NY: Freeman.
Boniwell, I., Zimbardo, P. (2004). Balancing Time Perspective in Pursuit of Optimal Functioning. Positive psychology in practice. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. 165-178.
Borgida, E., Howard-Pitney, B. (1983). Personal involvement and the robustness of perceptual salience effects. Personal and Social Psychology, 45, 560-570.
Carstensen, L.L., Isaacowitz, D.M., Charles, S.T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist. 54, 165-181.
Chudnovsky, V.E. (1980). О временном аспекте гармонического развития личности [On the temporal aspect of the harmonious development of personality]. Психолого-педагогические проблемы становления личности и индивидуальности в детском возрасте [Psychological and pedagogical problems of the formation of personality and individuality in childhood] (Ed.). V.V. Davyidov, I.V. Dubrovina. М. : Prosveschenie, 60¬67. (in Russian).
Fress, P. (1978). Восприятие и оценка времени [Perception and assessment of time]. Экспериментальная психология [Experimental psychology] (Ed.) P. Fress, Zh. Piazhe. Мoscow : Progress. 6. 88-130. (in Russian).
Golovakha, E.I., Kronik, A.A. (2015). Психологическое время личности [Psychological personality time]. Мoscow: Smyisl (in Russian).
Goshovsky, Ya.О. (2008). Ресоціалізація депривованої особистості [Resocialization of the deprived person]. Drogobich : Kolo (in Ukrainian).
Goshovsky, Ya.О. (2010). Депривований хронотоп як негативний чинник самореалізації особистості [Deprived chronotope as a negative factor of personal self-realization]. Education of the region. 1. 123-127. (in Ukrainian)
James, W. (1991). Психология : курс лекций [Psychology : Briefer Course]. Мoscow: Pedagogika. (in Russian).
Jane, P. (1981). Эволюция памяти и понятие времени [Evolution of memory and the concept of time]. Хрестоматия по общей психологии: психология памяти [A textbook on general psychology: the psychology of memory] (Ed.) Yu.B. Gippenreiter, V.Ya. Romanova. М. : Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta (in Russian).
Kovalev, V.I. (1988). Категория времени в психологии (личностный аспект) [Category of time in psychology (personal aspect)]. Категории материалистической диалектики в психологии [Categories of materialist dialectics in psychology] (Ed.) L.I. Antsyiferova. Мoscow: Nauka, 1988. 216-230. (in Russian).
Кronik, А.А. (1982). Психологические основания типологии индивидуальних стилей жизни [Psychological bases of typology of individual lifestyles]. Стиль жизни личности: теоретические и методологические проблемы [Lifestyle of the person: theoretical and methodological problems] (Ed.) L.V. Sohan, V.A. Tihonovich. Кyiv: Naukova dumka, 165-200. (in Russian).
Lennings, C.J. (1996). Self-efficacy and temporal orientation as predictors of treatment outcome in severely dependent alcoholics. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 14, 71-79.
Lennings, С.J. (1998). Profiles of time perspective and personality: Developmental considerations. Journal of Psychology. 132, 629-641.
Loginova, N.A. (1980). Шарлотта Бюлер – представитель гуманистической психологии. [Charlotte Buhler is a representative of humanistic psychology]. Psychology issues, 1, 154-158. (in Russian).
Mukhina, V.S. (1989). Психологическая помощь детям, воспитывающимся в учреждениях интернатного типа [Psychological assistance to children brought up in boarding schools]. Psychology 1, 32-39. (in Russian).
Nyutten, Zh. (2004). Мотивация, действие и перспектива будущего [Motivation, action and perspective of the future]. Мoscow: Smyisl (in Russian).
Rubinshteyn, S.L. (1973). Проблемы общей психологии [Problems of general psychology]. Мoscow: Pedagogika. (in Russian).
Titarenko T.M. (2003). Життєвий світ особистості: у межах і за межами буденності [The life world of the individual: within and outside of everyday life]. Кyiv: Lyibid. (in Ukrainian).
Vasilyuk, F.E. (1984). Психология переживания. Анализ преодоления критических ситуаций [Psychology of experience. Analysis of overcoming critical situations]. Мoscow: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta (in Russian).
Zimbardo, F., Boyd, J. (2010). Парадокс времени. Новая психология времени, которая улучшит вашу жизнь [The paradox of time. A new psychology of time that will improve your life]. SPb.: Rech. (in Russian).
Zimbardo, P.G., Boyd, J.N. (1999). Putting Time in Perspective: A Valid, Reliable Individual-Differences Metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271-1288.
