Ecological Worldview Position and Personal Norms in the Regulation of Ecologically Significant Behavior
Abstract
The work verifies the leading role of the ecological position (I. Kryazh) as part of the process of activating personal norms as a factor of pro-environmental behavior. The ecological worldview position is revealed through giving the “status” the main source of life support for the biosphere or money, which determines different assessments of ecological reality. To study personal norms, the modified Rosenzweig Picture-Frustration Study (I. Kryazh, 1995) was used. The sample consisted of 161 respondents. Structural equation modeling (SEM) techniques were used in testing of regulation models of pro-environmental behavior. It has been revealed that the ecological position has an indirect impact on pro-environmental behavior – through promoting pro-environmental norms and social norms of interpersonal communication. In so doing, the biospheric orientation reinforces the willingness to protect of the norm, which, in turn, enhances the assessment of the situation in which harm caused to nature or people is abnormal. Therefore, the realization of the biospheric position through the adoption of the role of defender of the norms of justice facilitates activation of the personal pro-environmental norms and so that supports pro-environmental behavior at the household. The adherence to pro-social norms of interpersonal communication has become an incentive for pro-environmental behavior at the household, if it opposed the neglect of the rights of others. When the prosocial position in interpersonal communication is just adopted under social pressure (the desire not to stand out, follow the rules of society, or unwillingness to be in the shoes of the accused), this will negatively occur on pro-environmental behavior at the household.
Downloads
References
Baieva, K.O. (2019). Rol ekolohichnoi pozytsii v vyznachenni spriamovanosti ekolohichnoi aktyvnosti i otsinky spravedlyvosti vzaiemodii [The role of ecological position to determine the orientation of environmental activity and evaluation the justice of the interaction]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats «Teoriia i praktyka suchasnoi psykholohii», 2(1), 17-23, http://www.tpsp-journal.kpu.zp.ua/archive/2_2019/part_1/5.pdf. [in Ukrainian].
Krjazh, I.V. (1995). Osobennosti reprezentacii v obydennom soznanii otnoshenij "chelovek – priroda" [Specific features of representation in the everyday consciousness the relationship between the person and the nature]: dis. … kandidata psihol. nauk. Spec.: 19.00.01. Har'kov, 166 [in Russian].
Krjazh, I.V. (2013) Psihologija smyslovoj reguljacii jekologicheski relevantnogo povedenija [Psychology of meaning regulation of environmentally relevant behaviour]: Dis. … dokt. psihol. n. po special'nosti 19.00.01. Har'kov, 2013. 435, http://dspace.univer.kharkov.ua/handle/123456789/ 10671. [in Russian].
Krjazh, I.V., Baieva, K.O. (2016). Ekolohichna sturbovanist' yak umova ekolohichno vidpovidal'noi povedinky [Environmental concern as condition of environmentally responsible behaviour]. Aktual'ni problemy psykholohii: Zbirnyk naukovykh prats' Instytutu psykholohii imeni H.S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy. Ekolohichna psykholohiia, 7(41), 180-190, http://www.appsychology.org.ua/data/jrn/v7/i41/20.pdf. [in Ukrainian].
Jel'ster, Ju. (1993). Social'nye normy i jekonomicheskaja teorija [Social Norms and Economic Theory]. THESIS: teorija i istorija jekonomicheskih i social'nyh institutov i system, (3), 73-91, https://igiti.hse.ru/data/011/314/1234/3_2_2Elste.pdf. [in Russian].
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/074959789190020T.
Arundati, R., Sutiono, H.T., & Suryono, I.A. (2020). Effect of ecological awareness, personal norms and ecological attitude to conservation behavior. Proceedings on Engineering, 2(2), 187-196. http://pesjournal.net/journal/v2-n2/9.pdf.
Bronfman, N.C., Cisternas, P.C., López-Vázquez, E., Maza, C. D. L., & Oyanedel, J.C. (2015). Understanding attitudes and pro-environmental behaviors in a Chilean community. Sustainability, 7(10), 14133-14152. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/10/14133.
Liu, X., Zou, Y., Wu, J. (2018). Factors influencing public-sphere pro-environmental behavior among Mongolian college students: A test of value–belief–norm theory. Sustainability, 10(5), 1384. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1384.
Poškus, M. S., Pilkauskaitė Valickienė, R., & Kuzinas, A. (2019). The effects of descriptive imagery and appeals on emotions and intentions related to pro-environmental behavior. Sustainability, 11(19), 5257. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/19/5257.
Qiu, W., Zhong, Z., & Huang, Y. (2021). Impact of perceived social norms on farmers’ behavior of cultivated land protection: an empirical analysis based on mediating effect model. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, 16(1), 114-124. https://academic.oup.com/ijlct/article/16/1/114/5874136.
Setiawan, B., Afiff, A. Z., & Heruwasto, I. (2021). Personal norm and pro-environmental consumer behavior: an application of norm activation theory. Asean Marketing Journal, 20(10), http://www.jke.feb.ui.ac.id/index.php/amj/article/view/12923/67546844.