VERBALIZATION OF WAR IN THE MODERN DIGITAL SPACE
Abstract
The research conducted by the author is framed within the concept of "war" and its verbalization in the modern digital space. One of the tools in this process is rhetoric, as a means of argumentation, persuasion, and reality construction. Due to the complexity of the digital space, the author distinguishes between "verbalization" and "visualization," both of which participate in the construction of reality. The conceptualization of war in the modern Ukrainian context is impossible without symbolization, which occurs in all forms and formats. Analyzing symbolic figures, the author emphasizes their role in shaping public opinion, creating Ukraine's image on a global level, and the overall perception of the war. The author highlights several key symbols that have gained wide recognition during the Russo-Ukrainian war: "Cyborgs," "Da Vinci," "Ghost of Kyiv," the Azov Regiment, the defenders of Snake Island, the dog Patron, and others. The article argues that symbols play a crucial role in the rhetoric of war, as they are capable of concentrating complex emotional and ideological messages, contributing to the unification of society and the formation of national identity. Photography, cinema, music, political speeches, videos, social media, books – all fall into the rhetorical field and verbalize, visualize the symbols of war. The analysis conducted by the author establishes that in modern conditions, these symbols are rhetorically constructed according to two modes: ethos and pathos, and reason, nobility, and deeds create the people's allegiance. The rhetorical transformations and strategies used in the verbalization of war have a powerful impact on public consciousness.
Downloads
References
Andriyanova, О. (2023). Features of military rhetoric. Grail of Science, (29), pp. 259–261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.07.07.2023.042 (In Ukrainian)
Astapova-Vyazmina, O. I. (2022). Political experience of war illustration: a syntagmatic analysis of visual symbols. Epistemological Studies in Philosophy Social and Political Sciences, 5(1), pp. 3–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15421/342201 (In Ukrainian)
Bliznyuk, K., & Melnyk, S. (2023). The concept of hero in wartime: associative aspect. Transcarpathian philological studies, 1(28), pp. 28-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/tps2663-4880/2023.28.1.5 (In Ukrainian)
Lysak, V., & Popadynets, M. (2024). Features of the formation of the national-centric worldview of a Ukrainian by linguistic and psychological means. In Scientific Research: Theoretical Foundations and Practical Applications. pp. 431-433. URL: https://isu-conference.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Scientific_research_theoretical_foundations_and_practical_applications.pdf (In Ukrainian)
Maslova, Y. (2023). Verbalisation of the concepts of war, peace, woman, man in the newspaper discourse of ukraine in the wartime period. Scientific Notes of the National University of Ostroh Academy: Philology Series, 85(17), pp. 71-77. URL: https://journals.oa.edu.ua/Philology/article/download/3804/3450/6485.
Ogar, A. (2019). Verbalisation of the concept of war in contemporary artistic discourse. Native word in the ethnocultural dimension. pp. 38-47 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24919/2411-4758.2019.177323 (In Ukrainian)
Smorzhevska, O. (2022). Mythology of war: artistic images and meanings. Ukrainian Studies Almanac, (30), pp. 108-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/2520-2626/2022.30.15 (In Ukrainian)
Trykolenko, S., & Eliseev, I. (2023). War through the eyes of ukrainian artists - iconic images and modern symbolism. Sustainable development of aviation infrastructure of ukraine, pp. 285-300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-312-8-11 (In Ukrainian)
Yunosha, M., & Krasiuk, O. (2024). Photographic portrait as a face of war. In innovative areas of solving problems of science and practice. International Scientific and Practical Conference, Oslo, November 8, 2021. 2021. pp. 179–183. URL: https://isg-konf.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Innovative-areas-of-solving-problems-of-science-and-practice.pdf. (In Ukrainian).
Aristotle’s (2019) Art of Rhetoric. trans. Robert C. Bartlett. University of Chicago Press.
Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (2022). Personal Values Across Cultures. Annual Review of Psychology, 73(1), pp. 517–546. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-125100
Copyright (c) 2025 Валерія Ткаченко

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication of this work under the terms of a license Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.


3.gif)



