SEARCH FOR GLOBAL JUSTICE IN A MULTICULTURAL SOCIETY (PHILOSOPHICAL CONCEPTUALIZATION)
Abstract
The potential of social philosophy as an explanatory tool for the processes of searching for global justice is considered. It was determined that the study of global justice provides not only a conceptual framework for understanding local issues of justice, but also enables a successful practical solution to these issues, since global justice in modern society becomes more effective than local justice. An example of this can be the support of Ukraine by the world's leading democracies in its opposition to the armed aggression of the russian federation, which dominates Ukraine in terms of economic, military and informational resources. The multiculturalism of modern societies is considered as a result of the intensification of international social communication. An essential relationship between the institutional and sociocultural components of social communication has been revealed: sociocultural changes acquire their institutional consolidation, and are also often the result of institutional transformations. Global justice is considered not only as an activity in accordance with certain social norms, but also as an affirmation of certain social values. The subject of global justice can be considered an unlimited communicative community, but such an approach requires taking into account a number of theoretical and practical caveats. Specific forms of universalization of social values are considered as those that are achieved due to the procedure of generalization of particular values of local social communities. As an example of such generalization, the task of forming national identity is considered. The formation of each social community is proposed to be analyzed in the unity of the processes of horizontal and vertical social integration.
Downloads
References
Anderson, B. (2001). Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism / trans. from English by V. Morozov. 2 ed., revision. Kyiv: Krytyka. (In Ukrainian).
Balibar, E. (2006). We, the People of Europe?: Reflections on Transnational Citizenship / trans. from Fr. By A. Riepa. Kyiv: Kurs. (In Ukrainian).
Boychenko, M. I. (2011). System Approach in Social Cognition: Value and Functional Aspects. Monograph. Kyiv: PROMIN. (In Ukrainian).
Durkheim, E. (2002). Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Totemism in Australia / trans. from French by H. Filipchuk and Z. Borysyk. Kyiv: Universe. (In Ukrainian).
Eisenstadt, S. N. (1978). Revolution and the Transformation of Societies: A Comparative Study of Civilizations. New York: The Free Press.
Ferguson, N. (2018). The Square and the Towers: Networks and Power, from the Freemasons to Facebook / trans. from English by Kateryna Disa. Kyiv: Nash Format. (In Ukrainian).
Habermas, J. (2000). Structural transformations in the sphere of openness: Study of the civil society category / trans. from German by A. Onishko. Lviv: Lytopis. (In Ukrainian).
Habermas, J. (2010). Theory of communicative action. Volume 1. Rationality of action and social rationalization / trans. from German by K. Polishchuk; of science ed. B. Polyarush. Lviv: Astrolabia. (In Ukrainian).
Lockwood, D. (1964). Social Integration and System Integration. G. Zollschan and W. Hirsch (eds.), Explorations in Social Change. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 244-257.
Luhmann, N. (1975). Grundrechte als Institution. Ein Beitrag zur politischen Soziologie. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.
Malinowski, B. (1948). Death and the Reintegration of the group. Magic, Science and Religion and Other Essays. Selected, and with an Introduction by R. Redfield. Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press. Pp. 29-35.
Moore, B. Jr. (1978). Injustice: The Social Bases of Obedience and Revolt. White Plains, New York: M.E. Sharpe.
North, D. (2000). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance / trans. from English by I. Dzyub. Kyiv: Osnovy. (In Ukrainian).
Parsons, T. (2011). Social Structure and Personality / trans. from English by V. Verloka and V. Kebuladze. Kyiv: DUKH i LITERA. (In Ukrainian).
Parsons, T. (1937). Structure of Social Action: A Study in Social Theory with Special Reference to a Group of Recent European Writers. New York: McGraw Hill.
Petrović, D. (2021). Cancel Culture аs A Hybrid Pattern Of Postmodern Sociability. KULTURA POLISA, 18(46), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.51738/Kpolisa2021.18.3r.2.06
Putnam, R.D., Leonardi, R., and Nanetti, R.Y. (2001). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy / trans. from English by V. Yushchenko. Kyiv: Osnovy. (In Ukrainian).
Simmel, G. (2010). Philosophy of Money / trans. from German by V. Zinchenko, V. Terletsky, I. Andrushchenko. Kyiv: Promin. (In Ukrainian).
Spencer, H. Social Statics. London: John Chapman 1851. 476 p.
Taylor, C. (2004). Multiculturalism and the "Politics of Recognition" / trans. from English. Kyiv: Alterpress. (In Ukrainian).
Weber, M. (2012). Economy and Society / trans. from German by M. Kushnir. Kyiv: Universe. (In Ukrainian).
Copyright (c) 2022 Михайло Бойченко
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication of this work under the terms of a license Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.