PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS OF THE INTERPRETATION OF THE PROBLEMS OF THE HISTORY OF UKRAINE IN THE REALITIES OF TODAY
Abstract
With the beginning of the hybrid war between Ukraine and the Russian Federation, the problem of history and its interpretation became especially acute. In the course of an ideological war between states, there is real speculation on the interpretation of history. In order to find ways to establish an optimistic worldview of Ukrainians, the author identifies the main current problems of interpretation of the history of Ukraine and outlines ways to solve them. Today, the educational sector, which is at the stage of modernization, also needs a philosophical analysis of the problems of interpretative history of Ukraine. Philosophical discourse about the content and directions of the historical process has theoretical and practical significance, contributes to the active search for optimal ways of social development. In his conclusions, the author relies on the scientific research of S. Krymsky, I. Boychenko, V. Bryansky, P. Ricoeur, R. Aron, E. Toffler, K. Jaspers, and others. researchers and concludes that Ukrainian society needs holistic ideas about the historical process, the need to form a national idea with an optimistic vision of Ukraine's future, recognition of the global concept of building a universal society, the need to integrate peoples and world civilizations, influence on modern Ukrainian realities in complex transformation processes, obtaining the neutralization of stable stereotypes of public opinion, which have a significant impact on modern Ukrainian realities in complex transformation processes.
Downloads
References
Zhadko, V. A. (2019). Philosophy as a humanistic outlook: scientific monograph. Zaporizhzhia. Publishing House: Novyy svit – 2000.
Murashkin, M. H. (2021). Science in the context of philosophical knowledge. Monograph. Dnipro. DDVUVS; Monolyt.
Nietzsche, F. (2004). About the benefits and harms of history for life. Lviv: Astrolabia.
Pavlenko, Y. V. (2001). History of world civilization. Socio-cultural development of people. Guidebook. Kyiv. Publishing House: Lybid.
Panchenko, O. V. (2005). Philosophy of history and modernity. Multiversum. Philosophical almanac, 2005, 45. // http://www.filosof.com.ua/Jornel/M_45/Panchenko.htm.
Stukanov, S. (2007). Many do not seek new victories. Partly because he doesn't know about the previous ones. Publishing House: Den, 31 of July, № 125. Retrieved from : www.day.kiev.ua.
Wallerstein I. (2004). World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Yermolenko, A. M. (2003). Environmental ethics: problems of substantiation. Practical philosophy. № 2–3.
Dilthey, W. (1996). Sсhleelrmacher's Hermeneutical System in Relation to Earlier Protestant Hermeneutics // W. Selected Works: On 6 Vol. / Edited by Rudolf A. Makkreel, Frithjof Rodi. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996. V. 4: Hermeneutics and the Study of History.
Copyright (c) 2022 Роман Халімон
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication of this work under the terms of a license Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.