PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS OF THE INTERPRETATION OF THE PROBLEMS OF THE HISTORY OF UKRAINE IN THE REALITIES OF TODAY

Keywords: interpretation, humanism, ecohumanism, globalism, research, history

Abstract

With the beginning of the hybrid war between Ukraine and the Russian Federation, the problem of history and its interpretation became especially acute. In the course of an ideological war between states, there is real speculation on the interpretation of history. In order to find ways to establish an optimistic worldview of Ukrainians, the author identifies the main current problems of interpretation of the history of Ukraine and outlines ways to solve them. Today, the educational sector, which is at the stage of modernization, also needs a philosophical analysis of the problems of interpretative history of Ukraine. Philosophical discourse about the content and directions of the historical process has theoretical and practical significance, contributes to the active search for optimal ways of social development. In his conclusions, the author relies on the scientific research of S. Krymsky, I. Boychenko, V. Bryansky, P. Ricoeur, R. Aron, E. Toffler, K. Jaspers, and others. researchers and concludes that Ukrainian society needs holistic ideas about the historical process, the need to form a national idea with an optimistic vision of Ukraine's future, recognition of the global concept of building a universal society, the need to integrate peoples and world civilizations, influence on modern Ukrainian realities in complex transformation processes, obtaining the neutralization of stable stereotypes of public opinion, which have a significant impact on modern Ukrainian realities in complex transformation processes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Roman Khalimon , National University «Chernihiv Collegium» named after Taras Shevchenko

Khalimon Roman O.

PhD Student at the Department of  Law, Philosophy and Political Science, educational and scientific institute of history and socio-humanitarian disciplines named after O. M  Lazarevsky

National University «Chernihiv Collegium» named after Taras Shevchenko

Myru Avenue, 13, Chernihiv, 14000, Ukraine

References

Aron R. (1948). Introduction to the Philosophy of History: An Essay on the Limits of Historical Objectivity. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Zhadko, V. A. (2019). Philosophy as a humanistic outlook: scientific monograph. Zaporizhzhia. Publishing House: Novyy svit – 2000.
Murashkin, M. H. (2021). Science in the context of philosophical knowledge. Monograph. Dnipro. DDVUVS; Monolyt.
Nietzsche, F. (2004). About the benefits and harms of history for life. Lviv: Astrolabia.
Pavlenko, Y. V. (2001). History of world civilization. Socio-cultural development of people. Guidebook. Kyiv. Publishing House: Lybid.
Panchenko, O. V. (2005). Philosophy of history and modernity. Multiversum. Philosophical almanac, 2005, 45. // http://www.filosof.com.ua/Jornel/M_45/Panchenko.htm.
Stukanov, S. (2007). Many do not seek new victories. Partly because he doesn't know about the previous ones. Publishing House: Den, 31 of July, № 125. Retrieved from : www.day.kiev.ua.
Wallerstein I. (2004). World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Yermolenko, A. M. (2003). Environmental ethics: problems of substantiation. Practical philosophy. № 2–3.
Dilthey, W. (1996). Sсhleelrmacher's Hermeneutical System in Relation to Earlier Protestant Hermeneutics // W. Selected Works: On 6 Vol. / Edited by Rudolf A. Makkreel, Frithjof Rodi. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996. V. 4: Hermeneutics and the Study of History.
Published
2022-11-25
Cited
How to Cite
Khalimon , R. (2022). PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS OF THE INTERPRETATION OF THE PROBLEMS OF THE HISTORY OF UKRAINE IN THE REALITIES OF TODAY. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series "Philosophy. Philosophical Peripeteias", (66), 75-81. https://doi.org/10.26565/2226-0994-2022-66-9
Section
Articles