ORDER PROBLEM AND THE CONCEPTUAL ATTITUDES OF MODERN THEORETICAL SOCIOLOGY

Keywords: society, cultural forms, the order problem, civilization, social system, normative system, communication, autopoiesis

Abstract

The article discusses modern conceptual perspectives in which clarification of the problem of social order is implemented. In this discussion, the following thesis is accepted: the well-known work of T. Hobbes "Leviathan..." is not just one of the explorations, albeit a classic one, on this topic, but acts as a kind of "possibility structure" for all and any subsequent attempts and experiences in this regard. This thesis is, in fact, also the task of consideration and its result (already as proven).

It turns out that the Hobbesian solution is not only (and rather not) an answer to the question of order, but a brilliant working model, using which it is convenient to form various theoretical propositions.

Hobbes's "Leviathan" gives space for the appearance of cardinal themes / regions / contents of theoretical consideration in modern social philosophy and sociology. Consideration of the topos of the birth of society as an order of coexistence of human individuals-actors; the nature of the corresponding potentials; the genesis of order and its mechanisms; possibilities and conditions for the continuation of the social, i.e., ordered state and its changes, transformations, grounds for the universality (super-individuality) of the order and the relationship of these grounds to the level of individual existence, consciousness and action, etc.

This demonstration is carried out through consideration of approaches to the problem of social order by Talcott Parsons, Jürgen Habermas, Nicolas Luhmann and Harold Garfunkel. In this context, the approaches of Pierre Bourdieu and Anthony Gedens are also mentioned.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Marina Smolyaga , National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute”

Smolyaga Marina V.

PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor of the Department of Philosophy

National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute”

2, Kyrpychova str., 61002, Kharkiv, Ukraine

References

Garfinkel, H. (1963). A conception of, and experiments with, «trust» as a condition of stable concerted actions. Motivation and social interaction: cognitive determinants (O. J. Harvey, Ed.). New York : Ronald Press, 187-238.
Garfinkel, H. (2003). Livingston E. Phenomenal field properties of order in formatted queues and their neglected standing in the current situation of inquiry. Visual Studies. Vol. 18, 1, 21 – 28.
Hobbes, T. (1994). Leviathan (with selected variants from the Latin edition of 1668) (Edwin Curley Ed. w. Int. and Not.). Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company Inc.
Habermas, J. (1992). The unity of reason and the diversity of its voices. Postmetaphysical Thinking: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 115-148.
Habermas, J. (1997). Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns. Band 2. Frankfurt am Main: Surkampf.
Luhmann, N. (1991). Soziale Systeme: Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Parsons T. Order as a social problem. The concept of order (P. G. Kuntz, Ed.). Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1968, 379-398.
Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press.
Parsons, T. (1949 [1937]). The structure of social action: a study in social theory with special reference to a group of recent European writers. Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press.
Parsons, T., Shils, E. A., Olds, J. (1951).Values, motives, and systems of action. Toward a general theory of action (T. Parsons and E. A. Shils, Eds). Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 47 – 275.
Published
2022-11-25
Cited
How to Cite
Smolyaga , M. (2022). ORDER PROBLEM AND THE CONCEPTUAL ATTITUDES OF MODERN THEORETICAL SOCIOLOGY. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series "Philosophy. Philosophical Peripeteias", (66), 68-74. https://doi.org/10.26565/2226-0994-2022-66-8
Section
Articles