PURPOSE OF METAPHYSICS: APOLOGY OF OVERAGE

Keywords: metaphysics, metaphysics of culture, space, subjectivity, sociality

Abstract

The article consistently substantiates the statement about the non-contextual nature of metaphysical knowledge. It is proved that metaphysics as knowledge of the limit level of abstraction determines the context, which gives it the status of a pure theory of the universal essential foundations of existence and knowledge of the world. Also, metaphysics as a speculative level of boundary abstractions determines the general contour of the realization of culture, on the specific historical interpretation of which depends the content of the cultural space of human existence. It is hypothesized that the metaphysics of culture emphasizes the constant principles of the specificity of human existence, and the effectiveness and efficiency of reflection on the phenomenon of culture is carried out by determining the fundamental for a particular era dialectical contradiction. Accordingly, metaphysics is a pronounced semantic construction of culture, which produces a certain type of thinking, memory and identification, i.e. subjectivity; and sociality as an ethical-axiological model of interaction with the Other. It is argued that classical metaphysics since its inception and throughout its long, meaningful and productive existence is a kind of orientation in space. The author argues that culture is a collection of space in an intelligible structure, the specific nature of human existence in the universe, the way of human being in the world. Space in the metaphysics of culture means the area of localization of the "Ego" and the field of transcendence at the same time. It is argued that metaphysics through the space of culture allows us to empirically feel the universe as Unite, to assume the existence of meaning. The concept of metaphysics of culture as a sphere of philosophical research of the phenomenon of culture in its boundary, extra-experiential, essential principles of historical development and semantic transformations is defined. Based on the analysis, the author summarizes the definition of the phenomenon of culture as a specifically human way of mastering space and the conquest of time, and consciousness - as a topology of reflective practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen S. R. (2018). Can Metaphysical Structuralism Solve the Plurality Problem? International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 26, 5: Substantialism, Factualism, and Structuralism: A Philosophical Dispute, 722-746. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2018.1544732

Alweiss L. (2007). Leaving Metaphysics to Itself. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 15, 3: Klaus Held: Reflections on Time, Mood, and Phenomenological Method, 349-365. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672550701445225

Barris J. (2015). Metaphysics, Deep Pluralism, and Paradoxes of Informal Logic. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 23, 1. 59-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2014.961506

Bryant A. K. (2017). What's Metaphysics All About? IAI News, 15 August. https://iai.tv/articles/what-is-metaphysics-all-about-auid-870

Burlaka D. K. (2009). Metaphysics of culture. Sankt-Peterburg: RKHGA. [in Russian].

Buford Ch., Allhoff F. (2005). Neuroscience and Metaphysics. The American Journal of Bioethics, 5, 2, 34-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265160590960258

De Dijn H. (1999). The vicissitudes of metaphysics in the Modern Age. South African Journal of Philosophy, 18, 1, 61-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/02580136.1999.10878178

De Vriese H. (2008). The Myth of the Metaphysical Circle: An Analysis of the Contemporary Crisis of the Critique of Metaphysics. Inquiry. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 51, 3, 312-341. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201740802120772

D'Oro G. (2013). The Philosopher and the Grapes: On Descriptive Metaphysics and Why It Is Not ‘Sour Metaphysics’. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 21, 4, 586-599. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2013.833959

Fisher A. R. J. Donald C. (2017). Williams’s defence of real metaphysics. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 25, 2, 332-355. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2016.1266461

Frost K. (2019). A metaphysics for practical knowledge. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 49, 3, 314-340. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2018.1516972

Girardi L. (2017). Phenomenological Metaphysics as a Speculative Realism. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 48, 4, 336-349. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2017.1362778

Grayling A.C. (2021). Metaphysics. Britannica. Retrieved from: https://www.britannica.com/topic/metaphysics

Guorong Y. (2012). Metaphysics. Reconstruction and Reflection. Contemporary Chinese Thought, 43, 4, 7-26. https://doi.org/10.2753/CSP1097-1467430401

Habermas J. (1994). Metaphysics as a way of life. Economy and Society, 23, 1, 93-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085149400000015

Heller A. (2004). The Unmasking of the Metaphysicians or the Deconstructing of Metaphysics? Critical Horizons. A Journal of Philosophy and Social Theory, 5, 1, 401-418. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568516042653602

Hindess B. (2014). Bringing Metaphysics Back In? History of European Ideas, 40, 1: The Humanities in Australia: Reflections on the Work of Ian Hunter, 44-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/01916599.2013.784032

Husyev V. I. (2016). Metaphysics as a philosophical science. NaUKMA Research Papers in Philosophy and Religious Studies, 180, 3-11. [in Ukrainian].

Ihnatʹyev V.A. (2012). Non-classical metaphysics. Philosophy of science: traditions and innovations, 1 (5), 117-125. [in Ukrainian].

Kozak B.V. (2020). The terminological correlation of "metaphysics" and "ontology" as a problem and opportunity. Scientific notes of Taurida National V.I. Vernadsky Universyty. Series: Philosophy, 31 (70), 1. DOI https://doi.org/10.32838/2709-2933/2020.1/02. [in Ukrainian].

Laks M. (2015). Introduction to modern metaphysics (excerpt). The nature of metaphysics – some historical reflections. University department, 4, 159-174. http://ir.kneu.edu.ua /bitstream/handle/2010/12335/159-174.pdf;jsessionid=77B52704718F54C0AF736E4 84E064C1F?sequence=1. [in Ukrainian].

Lam D. (2019). Metaphysics of quantity and the limit of phenomenal concepts. Inquiry. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 6, 3, 247-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2018.1446049

Maclaurin J., Dyke H. (2012). What is Analytic Metaphysics For? Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 90, 2, 291-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2011.587439

McLeod M., Parsons J. (2013). Maclaurin and Dyke on Analytic Metaphysics. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 91, 1, 173-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2012.730534

Meijer M. (2018). A peculiar enterprise. The fate of metaphysics in a naturalist climate. International Journal of Philosophy and Theology, 79, 1-2, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/21692327.2017.1402691

Metaphysics. (2014). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, оct. 31. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/metaphysics/

Milne P. (1992). Modal metaphysics and comparatives. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 70, 3, 248-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048409212345151

Nye H. (2019). Metaphysics before method? Jurisprudence. An International Journal of Legal and Political Thought, 10, 2, 246-254. https://doi.org/10.1080/20403313.2019.1620001

Parsons J. (2004). Real Metaphysics. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 82, 3, 530-532. https://doi.org/10.1080/713659866

Reeves C. (2016). Beyond the Postmetaphysical Turn: Ethics and Metaphysics in Critical Theory. Journal of Critical Realism, 91, 1, 217-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2016.1171666

Steinberg A. (2020). Paradigmatic Metaphysics. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 98, 2, 403-409. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2019.1695279

Sukhantseva V. K. (2006). Metaphysics of culture. Kiyev: Fakt. [in Russian].

Thomas O. (2009). Metaphysics and Natural Science. Theology and Science, 7, 1, 31-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700802617113

Wheeler III S. C. (2015). Introduction to Metaphysics. The European Legacy. Toward New Paradigms, 20, 1, 100-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2014.976935

Published
2021-12-28
Cited
How to Cite
Yatsenko, O. (2021). PURPOSE OF METAPHYSICS: APOLOGY OF OVERAGE. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series "Philosophy. Philosophical Peripeteias", (65), 51-62. https://doi.org/10.26565/2226-0994-2021-65-6
Section
Articles