EDUCATION IN THE PATTERNS OF DIGITAL CULTURE: THE INDIVIDUALITY OF THE DETERMINISTIC SUBJECT
Abstract
The article presents the problem of formation and determination of the individuality of the subject included in the world of digital culture. The study focuses on educational practices as one of the key factors influencing human subjectivity. The methodological basis of this research is a critical analysis and a multidisciplinary approach. This made it possible to consider a person, his characteristics and the problems of his personality in the postmodern era, as well as to determine the features of the current educational paradigm by comparing modern and postmodern educational models. The active development of mass media and Internet communications in the second half of the XX century is considered one of the factors that contributed to the significant ontological, axiological and anthropological transformations of modern culture, and also became one of the key factors in the formation of digital culture. The category of homo digitalis is explained as a unique phenomenon of the XXI century, its analysis is presented from different positions, including the definition of negative trends: decline of reflection, banalization of the New, primitive subjectivism, laziness, inability and unwillingness of analytical and critical mental activity, psychological problems, deviant manifestations, pedagogical vicissitudes and conflicts based on confrontations between generations, etc. Rejecting logocentrism and a rigid evaluative position, the study made an attempt to overcome skepticism regarding the expansion of digitalization into the educational process in the context of the modern problem of the massive introduction of distance education caused by the pandemic. It is proposed not to stigmatize the problems of individuality, which are characteristic of modern culture, as completely controlled by manipulative technologies, especially in relation to educational practices.
Downloads
References
/References
Baudrillard, J. (1999). Requiem for the Media. (M. M. Fodorova, Trans.). In Poetics and Politics: The Collection of Works (pp. 193–226). Moscow: Institute of Experimental Sociology. Retrieved from https://gtmarket.ru/library/articles/82. (Original work published 1971). (In Russian).
Bauman, Z. (2005). The Individualized Society. (V. L. Inoziemtsev, Trans. & Ed.). Retrieved from https://gtmarket.ru/library/basis/4993/5012. Moscow: Logos. (Original work published 2001). (In Russian).
Butler, J. (2005). Giving An Account of Oneself. New York: Fordham University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5422/fso/9780823225033.001.0001.
Coeckelbergh, M. (2020). The Postdigital in Pandemic Times: a Comment on the COVID-19 Crisis and Its Political Epistemologies. Postdigital Science and Education, 2, 547–550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00119-2.
Douse, М., & Uys, Р. (2019). Digital Age Consciousness, “Online Learning” and the Global School. In Proceedings from ICDE World Conference on Online Learning (November, 2019). Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/40399737/Digital_Age_Consciousness_Online_Learning_and_the_Global_School.
Kultaieva, M. (2020). Homo Digitalis, Digital culture and Digital Education: Explorations of Philosophical Anthropology and of Philosophy of Education. Philosophy of Education, 26(1), 8–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2020-26-1-1. (In Ukrainian).
Lena, M. (2015). The Spirit of Education. (O. Panych, Trans.). Kyiv: Dukh і Litera. (Original work published 1983). (In Ukrainian).
Patrikarakos, D. (2019). War in 140 Characters: How Social Media Is Reshaping Conflict in the Twenty-First Century. (I. Rudko, Trans.). Kyiv: Yakaboo Publishing. (Original work published 2017). (In Ukrainian).
Petit, Р. (2020). Technique, attention, entropie : 3 concepts chers à Bernard Stiegler, mort ce jeudi. France Culture. Retrieved from https://www.franceculture.fr/philosophie/technique-attention-entropie-3-concepts-chers-a-bernard-stiegler-mort-ce-jeudi. (In French).
Rorty, R. (2000). Education as Socialization and as Individualization. In R. Rorty, Philosophy and Social Hope (pp. 114–126). New York: Penguin Books. Retrieved from http://bookmarker.dellsystem.me/section/1280.
Коstyuchkov, S. К. (2018). Different Human Images and Anthropological Colissions of Post-modernism Epoсh: Biophilosophical Interpretation. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 13, 100–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i13.131967.
Бауман З. Индивидуализированное общество / пер. с англ. под ред. В. Л. Иноземцева. М.: Логос, 2005. 390 с. URL: https://gtmarket.ru/library/basis/4993/5012.
Бодрийяр Ж. Реквием по масс-медиа / пер. с франц. М. М. Фёдорова. Поэтика и политика: сборник работ. М.: Институт экспериментальной социологии, 1999. С. 193–226. URL: https://gtmarket.ru/library/articles/82.
Култаєва М. Homo digitalis, дигітальна культура і дигітальна освіта: філософсько-антропологічні і філософсько-освітні розвідки. Філософія освіти. 2020. № 1. С. 8–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2020-26-1-1.
Лена М. Дух освіти / пер. з фр. О. Панича. К.: Дух і літера, 2015. 344 с.
Патрикаракос Д. Війна у 140 знаках. Як соціальні медіа змінюють конфлікти у XXI столітті / пер. з англ. І. Рудько. К.: Yakaboo Publishing, 2019. 352 с.
Butler J. Giving an Account of Oneself. New York: Fordham University Press, 2005. 149 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5422/fso/9780823225033.001.0001.
Coeckelbergh M. The Postdigital in Pandemic Times: a Comment on the COVID-19 Crisis and Its Political Epistemologies. Postdigital Science and Education. 2020. No 2. pp. 547–550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00119-2.
Douse М., Uys Р. Digital Age Consciousness, “Online Learning” and the Global School. ICDE World Conference on Online Learning (November, 2019). 2019. URL: https://www.academia.edu/40399737/Digital_Age_Consciousness_Online_Learning_and_the_Global_School.
Petit Р. Technique, attention, entropie: 3 concepts chers à Bernard Stiegler, mort ce jeudi. France Culture. 2020. URL: https://www.franceculture.fr/philosophie/technique-attention-entropie-3-concepts-chers-a-bernard-stiegler-mort-ce-jeudi.
Rorty R. Education as Socialization and as Individualization. Rorty R. Philosophy and Social Hope: Collected Works. New York: Penguin Books, 2000. pp. 114–126. URL: http://bookmarker.dellsystem.me/section/1280.
Коstyuchkov S. К. Different Human Images and Anthropological Colissions of Post-modernism Epoсh: Biophilosophical Interpretation. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research. 2018. No 13. рр. 100–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i13.131967.
Copyright (c) 2020 Nataliya V. Kamardash
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication of this work under the terms of a license Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.