NETWORK CONFLICT AS A SOCIAL PHENOMENON
Abstract
The paper provides a conceptual study of network conflict phenomenon, identifying the essence and specifics of its manifestation in the social system. The process of modifying the system of social interaction, which leads to the formation of many political, economic and social contradictions, contributes to the formation of network conflicts. The paper identifies such essential characteristics of network processes that affect the dynamics of a conflict situation, such as, first, physical distance and the anonymity of network actors. They contribute to the formation of a sense of responsibility lack for the consequences of the conflict, create the illusion of absence rules, which can lead to a wrong perception of the problem and increase conflict. Secondly, sensory reduction, the inability to create a complete image with visual information leads to a deterioration of mutual understanding. Third, the appearance of the illusion of understanding the actor’s actions due to the creation of a distorted representation and incorrect perception of the information provided. Fourth, the absence of sanctions for violating values and norms makes it impossible to control the development of a conflict situation. Fifth, shortening the time interval for transmitting information creates, on the one hand, opportunities to control the speed of communication and forms additional opportunities for thinking about the problem, on the other hand, leads to the creation of the illusion of control over the situation. The article deals with the ontological, phenomenological and axiological modes of interaction of network structures in the situation of conflict confrontation. The paper concludes that the most effective way to reduce the impact of destabilizing factors on the system is systematically changing the network of interactions between its structural elements. Any system tends to adapt to the changed conditions of existence. Lack of regulation can lead to the destruction of network education. At the same time, the transformation of the conflicting form of interaction between actors leads to a change in the network. The study of conflicts, features and specifics of network elements interaction is practically significant, because this analysis will help to detect and activate integrative social mechanisms.
Downloads
References
/References
Barnett, T. (2004). The Pentagon New Map. War and Peace in the Twenty-First Century. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
Castells, M. (2000). Information Age: Economy, Society, Culture. Moscow: The Higher School of Economics Publishing House. (Original work published 1996). (In Russian).
Castells, M. (2017). Communication Power. New York: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 2009). (In Russian).
Fukuyama, F. (1999). The Great Disruption. London: Profile Books.
Joinson, A., McKenna, K., & Postmes, T. (2007). Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Korovin, V. M. (2014). Third World Network War. Saint Petersburg: Piter. (In Russian).
McLuhan, M. (2003). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Moscow, Zhukovskiy: Canon-press-TS, Kuchkovo Pole. (Original work published 1964). (In Russian).
Trofimova, G.N. (2013). Features of Negative Trends in Mass Communication. In N. V. Ufimceva (Ed.), Proceedings of the X International Congress of the International Society for Applied Sociolinguistics, Moscow, 2013 (pp. 174–176). (In Russian).
Wellman, B. (1988). Network Analysis: from Method and Metaphor to Theory and Substance. In B. Wellman & S. D. Berkowitz (Eds.), Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences (Vol. 2. Social Structures: A Network Approach, pp. 19–61). New York: Lang.
Кастельс М. Власть коммуникаций / пер. с англ. Н. М. Тылевич, науч. ред. А. И. Черных. М.: ГУ-ВШЭ, 2017. 592 с.
Кастельс М. Информационная эпоха: экономика, общество, культура / пер. с англ. Б. Э. Верпаховского, Д. А. Тищенко, А. Н. Субочев. М.: ГУ ВШЭ, 2000. 608 с.
Коровин В. М. Третья мировая сетевая война. СПб.: Питер, 2014. 352 с.
Маклюэн М. Понимание медиа: внешние расширения человека. М., Жуковский: Канон-пресс-Ц, Кучково поле, 2003. 464 с.
Tрофимова Г. Н. Особенности негативных тенденций в массовой коммуникации. Материалы Х международного конгресса международного общества по прикладной социолингвистике / под ред. Н. В. Уфимцевой и др. М., 2013. С. 174–176.
Вarnett T. The Pentagon New Map. War and Peace in the Twenty-First Century. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 2004. 499 p.
Fukuyama F. The Great Disruption. London: Profile Books, 1999. 494 р.
Joinson A., McKenna K, Postmes T. Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007. 508 p.
Wellman B. Network Analysis: From Method and Metaphor to Theory and Substance. Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences: Vol. 2. Social Structures: A Network Approach / Ed. by B. Wellman, S. D. Berkowitz. New York: Lang, 1988. pp. 19–61.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication of this work under the terms of a license Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.