LEO STRAUSS: A CRITIQUE OF HEGEL’S POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY
Abstract
The article is devoted to Leo Strauss’s critique of Hegel’s political philosophy. The author holds this topic relevant in the context of the crisis of modern political science. To understand the causes and nature of this crisis, it is necessary to pay attention to alternative philosophical and political theories of the XX century. Leo Strauss’s philosophy of politics is just such an alternative theory. Strauss made a radical critique of modern political philosophy, which he saw as an important part of the project of modern civilization. Strauss stresses that Hegel became one of the most prominent philosophers who participated in the creation of modern science and the modern world. The author considers the main critical arguments of Strauss, evaluates their validity and their significance for the Straussian conservative revolution in philosophy. The author pays special attention to the question of Hegel’s role in the break with classical political philosophy. Strauss accused Hegel that he had taken all the major steps that led to this rupture. Hegel, according to Strauss, secularized political thinking, which led to the loss of universal Christian values. The consequence of this secularization was the dominance of positivism in political philosophy. Hegel’s philosophy of history, according to Strauss, is relativism. Hegel’s historicism and progressivism are contradictory and inconsistent. Strauss also accuses Hegel of abandoning the philosophical esoteric art of writing. The article draws attention to the fact that Strauss recognized the importance of Hegel as an outstanding thinker of his time. Strauss viewed Hegel’s philosophy as a kind of intermediate link between classical philosophy and modern positivism. The author concludes that for Strauss the critique of Hegel’s political philosophy became an important element of his project of restoration of classical political philosophy. The article uses little-known materials from Strauss’s lectures in 1958 and 1965.
Downloads
References
/References
Altmann, W. (2007). Leo Strauss on “German Nihilism”. Learning the Art of Writing. The Journal of the History of Ideas, 68(4), 587–612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2007.0032.
Fuller, T. (2014). Allies, not Enemies. The Review of Politics, 76(4), 674–676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670514000643.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1935). Philosophy of History. (A. M. Voden, Trans.). In G. W. F. Hegel, The Collected Writings in 14 Volumes (Vol. 8). Moscow; Leningrad: Publishing House Partiynoe. (Original work published 1837). (In Russian).
Hegel, G. W. F. (1932). Lectures on the Philosophy of History. (B. G. Stolpner, Trans.). In G. W. F. Hegel, The Collected Writings in 14 Volumes (Vol. 10). Moscow; Leningrad: Publishing House Partiynoe. (Original work published 1837). (In Russian).
Karivets, I. V. (2010). Leo Strauss On Reading and Interpretation of Esoteric Texts. Paddkhati, 5. Retrieved from https://7promeniv.com.ua/naukovi-doslidzhennia-v/mizhdystsyplinarnyi-zhurnal/66-2010-vypusk-4/86-ihor-karivets-leo-shtraus-pro-chytannia-ta-tlumachennia-ezoterychnykh-tekstiv.htm. (In Ukrainian).
Kojève, A. (1990). Le Concept, le Temps et le Discours. Paris: Éditions Gallimard. (In French).
MacDonald, S., & Craig, B. (2014). Recovering Hegel from the Critique of Leo Strauss: The Virtues of Modernity. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Pangle, T. (2006). Leo Strauss: An Introduction to His Thought and Intellectual Legacy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Pippin, R. (1993). Being, Time, and Politics: The Strauss-Kojève Debate. History and Theory, 32(2), 138–161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2505349.
Rosen, S. (2006). Leo Strauss in Chicago. Daedalus, 135(3), 104–113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/daed.2006.135.3.104.
Schlie, M. (2013). Words without Desire: Strauss, Hegel, and Political Violence. The Review of Metaphysics, 66, 519–544.
Shevchuk, D. (2010). The Problem of Revival of Classical Tradition in Contemporary Political Philosophy: Hannah Arendt, Leo Strauss. Scientific Notes of the National University “Ostroh Academy”. Ser.: Philosophy, 6, 12–19. (In Ukrainian).
Strauss, L. (2000). An Introduction to Political Philosophy. (M. Fetisov, Trans.). Moscow: Logos; Praxis. (Original work published 1959). (In Russian).
Strauss, L. (2006). On Tyranny. (A. A. Rossius & A. M. Rutkevich, Trans.). Saint-Petersburg: Saint-Petersburg University Publishing House. (Original work published 1947). (In Russian).
Strauss, L. (2007). Natural Right and History. Moscow: Vodolei Publishers. (Original work published 1953). (In Russian).
Strauss, L. (1952). Persecution and the Art of Writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Strauss, L. (1954). On a Forgotten Kind of Writing. Chicago Review, 8(1), 64–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/25293010.
Strauss, L. (1999). German Nihilism. Interpretations, 26(3), 353–378.
Strauss, L. (2019a). Leo Strauss on Hegel. (P. Franco, Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226640716.001.0001.
Strauss, L. (2019b). Lectures on Hegel’s Political Philosophy. (P. Franco, Ed.). Chicago: Department of Political Science, The University of Chicago.
Геґель Г. В. Ф. Лекции пo истории философии. Книга вторая / пер. с нем. Б. Г. Столпнера. Сочинения: в 14 т.; т. 10. М.; Л.: Партийное издательство, 1932. 490 с.
Гегель Г. В. Ф. Философия истории / пер. с нем. А. М. Водена. Сочинения: в 14 т.; т. 8. М.; Л.: Партийное издательство, 1935. 468 с.
Карівець І. В. Лео Штраус про читання та тлумачення езотеричних текстів. Паддхаті. 2010. Вип. 5. URL: https://7promeniv.com.ua/naukovi-doslidzhennia-v/mizhdystsyplinarnyi-zhurnal/66-2010-vypusk-4/86-ihor-karivets-leo-shtraus-pro-chytannia-ta-tlumachennia-ezoterychnykh-tekstiv.html.
Шевчук Д. Проблема відродження класичної традиції в сучасній політичній філософії: Ханна Арендт, Лео Штраус. Наукові записки Національного університету «Острозька академія». Сер.: Філософія. 2010. Вип. 6. C. 12–19.
Штраус Л. Введение в политическую философию / пер. с англ. М. Фетисова. М.: Логос; Праксис, 2000. 365 с.
Штраус Л. Естественное право и история / пер. с англ. Е. Адлера, Б. Путько. М.: Водолей Publishers, 2007. 312 с.
Штраус Л. О тирании / пер. с англ. и древнегреч. А. А. Россиуса, пер. с франц. А. М. Руткевича. СПб.: Изд.-во С.-Петерб. ун.-та, 2006. 328 с.
Altmann W. Leo Strauss on “German Nihilism”. Learning the Art of Writing. The Journal of the History of Ideas. 2007. Vol. 68. Nо. 4. pp. 587–612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2007.0032.
Fuller T. Allies, not Enemies. The Review of Politics. 2014. Vol. 76. Issue 4. pp. 674–676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670514000643.
Kojève А. Le Concept, le Temps et le Discours. Paris: Éditions Gallimard, 1990. 320 p.
MacDonald S., Craig B. Recovering Hegel from the Critique of Leo Strauss: The Virtues of Modernity. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2014. 151 р.
Pangle T. Leo Strauss: An Introduction to His Thought and Intellectual Legacy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006. 200 р.
Pippin R. Being, Time, and Politics: The Strauss-Kojève Debate. History and Theory. 1993. Vol. 32. No. 2. рр. 138–161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2505349.
Rosen S. Leo Strauss in Chicago. Daedalus. 2006. Vol. 135. No. 3. рр. 104–113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/daed.2006.135.3.104.
Schlie M. Words without Desire: Strauss, Hegel, and Political Violence. The Review of Metaphysics. 2013. Issue 66. рр. 519–544.
Strauss L. German Nihilism. Interpretations. 1999. Vol. 26. No.3. рр. 353–378.
Strauss L. Lectures on Hegel’s Political Philosophy / Ed. by P. Franco. Chicago: Department of Political Science, The University of Chicago, 2019. 261 p.
Strauss L. Leo Strauss on Hegel / Ed. by P. Franco. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2019. 384 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226640716.001.0001.
Strauss L. On a Forgotten Kind of Writing. Chicago Review. 1954. Vol. 8. No. 1. pp. 64–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/25293010.
Strauss L. Persecution and the Art of Writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1952. pp. 22–37.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication of this work under the terms of a license Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.