“ANTHROPOHOLISM” AS AN AUTHENTIC TOOL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Abstract
Ever since nonhuman entity and the environment became a major ethical issue, anthropocentric worldviews have been blamed for all that is morally wrong about our dealings with nature. Those who regard themselves as non-anthropocentrists / holistic scholars typically assume that the West’s anthropocentric axiologies and ontologies stir all of the environmental degradations associated with human species. In contrast, a handful of environmental philosophers aver that anthropocentrism is entirely acceptable as a foundation for environmental ethics as human’s perspective cannot be entirely removed from the decision-making process. They often argue that is it possible for the man to act responsibly towards the environment for human’s sake and its future generation. Thus there is an ever-present tension between anthropocentrism and holism, with each side trying to oust talk each other. In my opinion, those extreme views are lump sided, as such lack room for tolerance. The thrust of this paper is to bridge the gap within these ethical theories with the theory of “anthropoholism”. Anthropoholism is a theory in environmental ethics that acknowledges man (anthropo) central role; perspective, place in eco-system as well as ontology but argues that despite this position, Man is just a part of nature, such that he cannot exist independently of the environment, or cannot be understood without reference to the environment. With this, the theory of anthropoholism is able to bridge the gap between the two extreme views by stating the obvious and explaining the connection between the two extreme views.
Downloads
References
Ascott, R. (Ed.). (2009). New Realities: Being Syncretic. Proceedings of the IXth Consciousness Reframed Conference, Vienna, 2008, July 3–5. Wien: Springer.
Asouzu, I. I. (2005). The Method and Principles of Complementary Reflection in and beyond African Philosophy. Münster: Lit Verlag.
Barney, K. F., & Perkinson, M. A. (2016). Occupational Therapy with Aging Adults: Promoting Quality of Life through Collaborative Practice. St. Louis; MO: Elsevier.
Crowther, R. (2019). Wellbeing and Self-transformation in Natural Landscapes. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ekwealo, C. J. (2014). African Environmental Values Expressed through Proverbs. In J. Appleton (Ed.), Values in Sustainable Development (pp. 193–203). Abingdon; New York: Routledge. (Original work published 2004).
Frierson, P. (2013). Metastandards in the Ethics of Adam Smith and Aldo Leopold. Environmental Ethics, 29 (2), 171–191. doi: http://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics200729219.
Gyekye, K. (1997). Tradition and Modernity: Philosophical Reflections on the African Experience. New York: Oxford University.
Gyekye, K. (2003). Person and Community in African Thought. In P. H. Coetzee & A. P. J. Roux (Eds.), Philosophy from Africa. Johannesburg: International Thomson Publishing ITP.
Haas, P. J. (2005). Elliot Dorff. Love Your Neighbor and Yourself: A Jewish Approach to Modern Personal Ethics. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 2003. xvii, 366 pp. AJS Review, 29 (1), 181–183. doi: http://doi.org/10.1017/s0364009405320095.
Hayward, T. (1997). Anthropocentrism: A Misunderstood Problem. Environmental Values, 1 (6), 49–63.
Heidegger, M. (1993). The Question Concerning Technology. In M. Heidegger, Basic Writings (Revised and Expanded Edition). London: Routledge.
Hossein, S. (1968). Man and Nature: The Spiritual Crisis of Modern Man. New Delhi; Bombay; Bangalore; Calcutta; Kanpur: Vikash Publishing House Pvt. Ltd.
Kaoma, K. J. (2010). Ubuntu, Jesus, and Earth: Integrating African religion and Christianity in Ecological Ethics (PhD Thesis). Boston University.
Light, A., & Rolston III, H. (2003). Introduction: Ethics and environmental ethics. In A. Light & H. Rolston III (Eds.), Environmental ethics: An anthology (pp. 1–12). Malden, MA; Blackwell Publishing Inc.
Matolino, B. (2008). The Concept of Person in African Political Philosophy: An Analytical and Evaluative study (PhD Thesis). University of KwaZulu-Natal.
Mbiti, J. S. (1970). African Religions and Philosophies. New York: Anchor Books.
Mbiti, J. S. (2001). African Religion and the World Order. In P. M. Mische & M. Merking (Eds.), Toward a Global Civilisation? The Contribution of Religions (pp. 361–370). New York: Peter Lang Publishing Inc.
Menkiti, I. A. (1984). Person and Community in African Thought. In R. A. Wright (Ed.), African Philosophy: An introduction (pp. 171–181). Lanham: University Press of America.
Midgley, M. (1994). The End of Anthropocentrism? In R. Attfield & A. Belsey (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference: Philosophy and the Natural Environment, Royal Institute of Philosophy, Cambridge, 1993, July 20–22 (pp. 103–112). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246100006482.
Norton, B. G. (2005). Environmental Ethic and Weak Anthropocentrism. In L. Kalof & T. Satterfield (Eds.), The Earthscan Reader in Environmental Values (pp. 81–96). London, UK: Earthscan.
Passmore, J. (1995). Attitude to Nature from Environmental Ethics. (R. Eliot, Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Remele, K., & Tutu, D. (2013). Animal Protection And Environmentalism. In A. Linzey (Ed.), The Global Guide to Animal Protection (pp. 68–69). Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/j.ctt2tt9r9.
Tangwa, G. (2006). Some African Reflection on Biomedical and Environmental Ethics. In K. Wiredu (Ed.), A Companion to African Philosophy (pp. 387–399). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Ugwuanyi, L. O. (2011). Advancing an Environmental Ethics through the African World-view. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4 (2), 107–114.
Warren, M. A. (1997). Moral Status: Obligations to Persons and Other Living Things. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Watts, J. (2018). We have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/oct/08/global-warming-must-not-exceed-15c-warns-landmark-un-report.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication of this work under the terms of a license Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
3.gif){kind=logo}
