AXIOLOGICAL DIMENSION OF ACTIVITIES: CREATIVITY AS A PRESENTATION OF THE SPIRITUAL IMAGE OF PERSONALITY TO THE WORLD
Abstract
The author proposes to turn to a detailed consideration of such form of activity as “creativity”, proposing it as the main form of practical refraction of the spiritual appearance of the personality, as its essential effective component. The category “creativity” is viewed as a synthesis of creativity and a willingness to transform the world, a motivation to work for the benefit of humanity. In this respect, the semantic equivalent of this term, which is widely spread among various language groups, is somewhat broader than its English version of this category – the term “building” or “creativity”, which, we think, focus more on the external aspect of the activity, character and transformation results than in the inner spiritual impulse to collective altruistic work. We regard “creativity” as a category, which embodying creativity, but not reduced to it, largely taking into account the nature of the relationship with previous transformations, continuity, in essence, as a manifestation of culture in its original meaning of processing and improvement. In this context, the category of “creativity”, taking into account the nature of homeostasis, maintaining the stability of the system, can be considered as a necessary element of sustainable development, directing a noospheric society, overcoming the system of environmental, demographic problems. Like the English term “building,” the category “creativity” reveals the nature of achieving an intellectual goal through projective engineering, inventive activity, and modernization of production. At the same time, the term “creativity” takes into consideration the cumulative capital of achievements, accumulation, enrichment, and the systemic nature of doing business, expressed by the term “management”, as the art of system management. Creativity is considered as an organic unity of demonstration of social and personal and, therefore, can be considered as a kind of spiritual bridge connecting culture and civilization, the world of dreams, the world of imagination, the spiritual world and the world of everyday life. Creativity is not only an ontological expression of the “rootedness” of the individual in the system of personal and social being, such as the nature of life activity that guarantees survival, protection and security, but also a motivational readiness for a fundamental transformation of the world that can prevent the destructive impact on civilization of global present-day problems. We believe that Creativity should be considered as the leading concept of education, supporting in the personality’s aimed at self-affirmation and development that is being a condition for moving to the future.
Downloads
References
/References
Absalyamova, H. H., & Bayhulova, H. S. (2012). On the Essence and Structure of the Spirituality of the Person. Cherepovets State University Bulletin, 1 (2), 104–107. (In Russian).
Avanesova, H. A., & Vahreneva, P. E. (2005). Berdyaev’s Spirit Project (Experience of a Systematic Approach to Berdyaev’s Heritage). Bulletin of Moscow University, 7, 37–57. (In Russian).
Bekh, I. (2012). Spiritual Values as a Personal Property. Ridna shkola – Native school, 1-2, 9–12. (In Ukrainian).
Brodetska, Yu. Yu. (2014). Practices of Deformation of the Integrity of Social Reality: the Objectification of Desires as a Legacy of Civilizational Progress. Antropolohichni Vymiry Filosofskykh Doslidzhen – Anthropological Measurement of Philosophical Studies, 6, 71–81. (In Russian).
Bueva, L. P. (1985). Social Progress and Humanism. Moscow: Znanie, 1985. (In Russian).
Fasmer, M. (1973). Etymological Dictionary of the Russian Language (Vol 4). (O. N. Trubachev, Trans.). Moscow: Progress. (In Russian).
Flier, A. Ya. (2007). Culture of Violence. In New Civilization: Interdisciplinary Scientific Practical Digest (pp. 57–69). Samara: Publishing House of Samara Scientific Center of the RAS.
Havro, S. N., & Asher, T. (2007). The Crisis of a Globalizing World and the Transition to a Planetary Culture. In New Civilization: Interdisciplinary Scientific Practical Digest (pp. 170–182). Samara: Publishing House of Samara Scientific Center of the RAS. (In Russian).
Lanovenko, O. P. (Ed). (2004). XXI Century: World Between Past and Future. Culture as a Backbone Factor of International and National Security. Kyiv: Stylos. (In Russian).
Khoruzhyy, S. S. (2018). Modernity and Eschatology: René Girard and the Last Minute Paradigm of Salvation. Voprosy Filosofii – Questions of Philosophy, 6, 111–120. Retrieved from http://vphil.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1976&Itemid=52.
Kirichenko, I. A. (2017). Historical Forms of Individual Deviation. Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series «Philosophy. Philosophical Peripeteias», 57, 85–92. (In Ukrainian).
Kondrashev, V. N., & Lyubutin, K. M. (2012). The Concept of Historicity in the Philosophy of Karl Marx. Filosofiya i Suspilstvo – Philosophy and Society, 4, 3–22. (In Russian).
Kudin, V. O. (2006). Meditations. Kharkiv: NTU «KhPI». (In Russian).
Melnik, V. I. (2004). Civilization as a Category of Social Philosophy. (Doctoral thesis). Yekaterinburg: Ural State University. (In Russian).
Nazaryatyan, A. P. (2018). Challenges and Prospects of Civilization: Will Evolution
on the Earth Become Cosmically Significant? Voprosy Filosofii – Questions of Philosophy, 6, 99–110. (In Russian).
Platonov, H. V., & Kosych, A. D. (1998). Person Spiritual Problems. Bulletin of Moscow University, 2, 3–32. (In Russian).
Prokhorenko, A. V. (2010). Spirituality as a Necessary Component of the Humanization of Personality. Molodoy Uchenyy – Young Scientist, 5 (1), 257–259. Retrieved from https://moluch.ru/archive/16/1614/. (In Russian).
Shapoval, N. V. (2017). Destructiveness of Human Behavior: a Philosophical Analysis. Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series «Philosophy. Philosophical Peripeteias», 57, 93–97. (In Russian).
Schweitzer, A. (1973). Culture and Ethics. (N. A. Zakharchenko, G. V. Kolshanovsky, Trans.). Moscow: Progress. (Original work published 1923). (In Russian).
Tomalintsev, V. N. (1999). The Man at the Turn of the Millennium. Paradoxes of Spiritual Development: Experience in the Researching of the Phenomenon of Sophistication in Culture and Art. Saint Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Publishing House. (In Russian).
Voronkova, V. H. (2012). Formation of a New Worldview, a New Man, a New Society of the Future. In O. A. Bazaluk (Ed.), The Image of a Man of the Future: Who and How to Educate in the Younger Generations (Vol. 2, pp. 134–152). Kyiv: Skif. (In Russian).
Абсалямова Г. Г., Байгулова Г. С. О сущности и структуре духовности личности. Вестник Череповецкого государственного университета. 2012. № 1. Т. 2. С. 104–107.
Аванесова Г. А., Вахренева П. Е. Духовный проект Н. Бердяева (Опыт системного подхода к наследию). Вестник Московского университета. 2005. № 7. С. 37–57.
Бе І. Духовні цінності як надбання особистості. Рідна школа. 2012. № 1-2. С. 9–12.
Бродецкая Ю. Ю. Практики деформации целостности социальной реальности: объективация желаний как наследие цивилизационного прогресса. Антропологические измерения философских исследований. 2014. Вип. 6. С. 71–81.
Буева Л. П. Общественный прогресс и гуманизм. М.: Знание, 1985. 64 с.
Воронкова В. Г. Формирование нового мировоззрения, нового человека, нового общества будущего. Образ человека будущего: Кого и Как воспитывать в подрастающих поколениях: коллективная монография / под ред. О. А. Базалука. К.: Скиф, 2012. Т. 2. С. 134–152.
Гавров С. Н., Ашер Т. Кризис глобализирующегося мира и переход к планетарной культуре. Новая цивилизация. Междисциплинарный научно-практический сборник. Самара: Самарский научный центр РАН, 2007. С. 170–182
XXI век: мир между прошлым и будущим. Культура как системообразующий фактор международной и национальной безопасности / науч. ред. О. П. Лановенко. К.: Стилос, 2004. 572 с.
Кіріченко І. А. Історичні форми індивідуальної девіації. Вісник Харківського національного університету імені В. Н. Каразіна. Серія «Філософія. Філософські перипетії». Вип. 57. 2017. С 85–92.
Кондрашев В. Н., Любутин К. Н. Понятие историчности в философии К. Маркса. Философия и общество. 2012. № 4. С. 3–22.
Кудин В. А. Раздумья. Харьков: НТУ «ХПИ», 2006. 356 с.
Мельник В. И. Цивилизованность как категория социальной философии: автореферат диссертации на соискание учёного звания доктора философских наук: 09.00.11. Екатеринбург: Ур. гос. ун-т имени А. М. Горького, 2004. 42 с.
Назарятян А. П. Вызовы и перспективы цивилизации: станет ли эволюция на земле космически значимой? Вопросы философии. 2018. № 6. С. 99–110.
Платонов Г. В., Косичев А. Д. Проблемы духовности личности. Вестник Московского университета. 1998. № 2. С. 3–32.
Прохоренко А. В. Духовность как необходимая составляющая гуманизации личности [Электронный ресурс]. Молодой ученый. 2010. № 5. Т. 1. С. 257–259. URL: https://moluch.ru/archive/16/1614/.
Тарасов А. Н. Теория деконструкции как философско-теоретическая основа эстетики постмодернизма. Философия и общество. 2009. № 1. С. 174–187.
Томалинцев В. Н. Человек на рубеже тысячелетий. Парадоксы духовного развития: Опыт исследования феномена изощренности в культуре и творчестве. СПб.: Издательство Санкт-Петербургского университета, 1999. 109 с.
Фасмер М. Этимологический словарь русского языка: в 4-х т.; т. 4. / пер. с нем. О. Н. Трубачева. М.: Прогресс, 1973. 855 с.
Флиер А. Я. Культура насилия. Новая Цивилизация. Междисциплинарный научно-практический сборник. Самара: Самарский научный центр РАН, 2007. С. 57–69.
Хоружий С. С. Современность и эсхатология: Рене Жирар и парадигма спасения в последний миг [Электронный ресурс]. Вопросы философии. 2018. № 6. С. 111–120. URL: http://vphil.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1976&Itemid=52.
Шаповал Н. В. Деструктивность человеческого поведения: философский анализ. Вестник Харьковского национального университета имени В. Н. Каразина. Серия «Философия. Философские перипетии». 2017. Вып. 57. С. 93–97.
Швейцер А. Культура и этика / пер. с нем. Н. А. Захарченко и Г. В. Колшановского; общая ред. и предислов. В. А. Карпушина. М.: Прогресс, 1973. 344 с.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication of this work under the terms of a license Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.