PHILOSOPHY OF PRESENCE: SKOVORODA AND HUMBRECHT (ENLIGHTENMENT AND POSTMODERNITY). DESCRIPTION OF THE CONDITIONS AND POSSIBILITIES OF THE EVENT OF THOUGHT TO INFLUENCE THE CONTEXTS
Abstract
The current research presents a phenomenological description of the experience of thought as an experience of free self-determination of a philosopher through a combination of his professional activity, life circumstances and texts as projects of self-actualization of a philosopher in his attempts to find himself and to declare his presence in the world. Through sophisticated overlaps and intersections of Work, Speech, and Life as appropriated by a philosophizing person, this stands as an act of perceiving himself, the past and present without mediation; to reveal his presence in this world against depriving himself of a chance to carry out his own philosophical act. Philosophical description is reckoned a description of the cognitive situation, where a philosophizing person finds himself. Here description coincides with self-description, the existential tension of the thinking process in the experience of
self-realization. A philosophical text conveys a state experienced by its creator, things that happened to him (Merab Mamardashvili); it testifies to his presence in the world and for the world. Phenomenology, as its founder Edmund Husserl claims, must be “descriptive psychology” in the first place, thus bringing us to “things themselves”, and only subsequently to transcendental phenomenology. The personalities picked to illustrate this claim are not accidental, as they prove a possibility to bridge receptions of Western philosophy and national icons, even across time and space, becoming symbols of this connection. Skovoroda and Humbrecht are representatives of the culture of presence. Their thoughts and statements, suggest describing things as they are. In such a situation, an important factor is the way of communicating information about oneself, about culture and time by a philosopher present in the world, proving his ability to invent the structures of narration about himself and his presence, to manifest the image of «narrative identity» (Paul Ricoeur), necessary for the self-formation of a person. The philosophy of presence refers to yet another story: how philosophy defines its attitude to the world via its presence in the world, determining its role in the relations with the world, which it is forced to enter. At the moment of text creation, the non-empirical Self of a philosopher becomes a matter (text), in this sense, a philosophical work is performative, aimed at the implementation of thought, which revealed itself for that purpose, namely to influence the contexts (society, history, and culture). The emphasis is placed on the formation of the philosophical logic of modern culture and the principles on which it is formed, which enables a broader understanding of logic and of contemporary rationality.
Downloads
References
/References
Ado, P. (2014) What is Ancient Philosophy? (S. L. Yosypenko, Trans.). Kyiv: Novyi Akropol. (Original work published 1995). (In Ukrainian).
Brown, W. (2015, May 13). On the Danger of Neoliberalism and the Crisis of Democracy. Retrieved from http://s357a.blogspot.com/2015/05/blog-post_13.html. (In Russian).
Brown, W. (2015). Undoing Democracy: Neoliberalism’s Re-Making of State and Subject. (V. Korablyova, Trans.). Topos, 2-3, 11–41. (In Russian).
Golovashchenko, S. I. (2002). European Biblical Studies in Kyiv Academy: Textual Representation of Personalities and Traditions. Magisterium. Istoryko-filosofski studii – Historical and Philosophical Studies, 9, 22–34. (In Ukrainian).
Gumbrecht, H. U. (2006). Production of Presence: What Meaning Cannot Convey. (S. Zenkin, Trans.). Moscow: Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie. (In Russian).
Hess de Kalve, G. A. (1817). Skovoroda, Ukrainian Philosopher. Ukrainskii vestnik – Ukrainian Journal, IV, 106–119. (In Russian).
Drach, I., Krymskyi, S. B., & Popovych, M. V. (1984). Hryhorii Skovoroda. Kyiv: Molod. (In Ukrainian).
Zakydalskyi, T. (1996). Skovoroda – Narcissus in a Distorted Mirror. National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy. Naukovi zapysky – Scientific Notes, 1. Philosophy and Religious Studies, 59–65. (In Ukrainian).
Kultaieva, M. (2014). Anthropotechical Turn and its Social-Philosophical and Philosophical-Educational Implications in Theoretical Research of Peter Slotterdajk. Filosofiia Osvity –Philosophy of Education, 1 (14), 54–75. (In Ukrainian).
Loi, A. M., & Tolstoukhov, A. V. (2000). Practical Philosophy of Today: Subject and Prospects. Praktychna Filosofiia – Practical Philosophy, 1, 6–19. (In Ukrainian).
Ricoeur, P. (1995). Hermeneutics. Ethics. Politics. Moscow: Kami Academia. (In Russian).
Chyzhevsky, D. (1983). Outlines of the History of Philosophy in the Ukraine. Muenich: Ukrainian Free University. (In Ukrainian).
Ern, V. (2000). Struggle for Logos. Grigoriy Savvich Skovoroda. Life and doctrine. Moscow; Minsk: Logos. (In Russian).
Foucault, M. (1996). What is the Enlightenment? Voprosy metodologii – Methodology Issues, 1–2. (In Russian).
Habermas, J. (2003). Philosophical Discourse on Modernity. (M. Belyaev, K. Kostin, E. Petrenko, I. Rozanov, G. Severskaya, Trans.). Moscow: Ves mir. (Original work published 1985). (In Russian).
Zakydalsky, T. (1965). The Theory of Man in the Philosophy of Skovoroda (M. A. Thesis). Bryn Mawr College.
Адо П. Що таке антична філософія? / пер. з франц. С. Л. Йосипенка. К.: Новий Акрополь, 2014. 428 с.
Браун В. Об опасности неолиберализма и кризисе демократии [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://s357a.blogspot.com/2015/05/blog-post_13.html.
Браун В. Разрушая демократию: ре-конституирование государства и субъекта неолиберализмом [Электронный ресурс] / пер. с англ. В. Кораблевой. Топос. 2015. № 2–3. С. 11–41.
Гессъ де Кальве Г. Сковорода, украинскій філософъ. Украинскій вѣстник. Харьковъ, 1817. 4. VІ. Апрель. [Кн. 4]. С. 106–119.
Головащенко С. І. Європейська біблеїстика в Київській академії: текстуальна репрезентація персоналій та традицій. Національний університет «Києво-Могилянська академія». Магістеріум. Історико-філософські студії. 2002. Вип. 9. С. 34–22.
Гумбрехт Х. У. Производство присутствия: Чего не может передать значение / пер. с англ. С. Зенкина. М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2006. 184 с.
Драч І. Ф., Кримський С. Б., Попович М. В. Григорій Сковорода. К.: Молодь. 213 с.
Закидальський Т. Сковорода – Наркіс у кривому дзеркалі. Національний університет «Києво-Могилянська академія». Наукові записки. Том 1. Філософія та релігієзнавство. Київ, 1996. С. 59–65.
Култаєва М. Антропотехнічний поворот та його соціально-філософські та філософсько-освітні імплікації у теоретичних розвідках П. Слотердайка. Філософія освіти. 2014. №1 (14). С. 54–75.
Лой А. М., Толстоухов А. В. Практична філософія сьогодення: предмет і перспективи. Практична філософія. 2000. № 1. С. 6–19.
Рикёр П. Герменевтика. Этика. Политика / пер с франц. М.: Kami Academia, 1995, 160 с.
Сковорода Г. Повна академічна збірка творів / за ред. Л. Ушкалова. Харків: Майдан, 2010. 1400 с.
Чижевський Д. Нариси з історії філософії на Україні (2-ге видання). Мюнхен: Український вільний університет, 1983. 105 с.
Эрн В. Борьба за логос. Григорий Саввич Сковорода. Жизнь и учение. Москва; Минск: Логос, 2000. 408 с.
Фуко М. Что такое просвещение? / пер с франц. Вопросы методологии, 1996, № 1–2.
Хабермас Ю. Философский дискурс о модерне / пер. с нем. М. М. Беляева, К. В. Костина, Е. Л. Петренко, И. В. Розанова, Г. М. Северской. М.: Весь мир, 2003. 416 с.
Zakydalsky T. The Theory of Man in the Philosophy of Skovoroda. Bryn Mawr College, 1965.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication of this work under the terms of a license Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.