MNEMOTECHNIC OF PAIN: BETWEEN SUFFERING AND ENJOYMENT
Abstract
The article analyzed the problem of mnemotechnic of pain in the context of the historical transformation of thinking from archaic bodily practices of graphism of pain to the modern culture of anesthesia. The conceptual knot, which forms pain, suffering, memory, procedures of designation and enjoyment, is defined. Subject is defined to be central that goes beyond the opposition/dialectic of myth and reason. This allows us to turn to the premythic and to analyze the graphism of pain as the basis of human existence in the context of the formation of individual and collective memory. In the meantime, the myth is interpreted as an attempt to portray the labeled physical bodies of the world, given the distinction between them. The formation of relations of power is associated with the establishment of a correlation between sign and pain, which makes it possible to understand of pain as the basis of social memory. On the other hand, the historical-philosophical subject is distinguished, according to which the bodily topical of the perceptions and the metabodily topic of concepts are distinguished. The metaphysical shift laid down by the ancient philosophers transforms mnemotechnic into practice, which constantly takes into account the distinction between the sensual (physical) and the supersensual (spiritual), the ideal and the real, the true and the false, the one and the plural, being and non-existence. Mnemotechnic, which constitutes the metaphysical world, excludes the body as a matter of memory, leaving the pain beyond the added significance. Probably, it is possible to link the excesses of Sade’s search for enjoyment and cases of dramatic erosion of man to naked bodility, which captures the outbreaks of violence and torture in the century. In the end, it transforms modern culture into a culture of anesthesia, a culture of memory as an anesthetic, directed against the repetition of pain. Nevertheless, at the same time, it causes new pleasures to seek pain.
Downloads
References
/References
Abramović, M. (2015). Walk Through Walls: A Memoir. New York: Crown Archetype.
Amery, J. (2015). On the other side of crime and punishment. Moscow: Nowoe izdatelstvo. (In Russian).
Corns, J. (Ed.). (2017). Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Pain. London; New York: Routledge.
Dostoevsky, F. M. (1973). Crime and Punishment. In F. M. Dostoevsky, Complete works in thirty volumes (Vol. 6). Leningrad: Nauka. (Original work published 1866). (In Russian).
Fisher, M. (2014, March 19). Good For Nothing. Retrieved from https://theoccupiedtimes.org/?p=12841.
Foucault, M. (1999). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. (V. Naumov, Trans.). Moscow: Ad Marginem Press. (Original work published 1975). (In Russian).
Heidegger, M. (1993). What is it – philosophy? Voprosy Filosofii – Questions of Philosophy, 8,
–123. (Original work published 1954). (In Russian).
Kamper, D. (2010). Signs as Scars. Graphism of Pain. In D. Kamper, Body. Violence. Pain: Collected Articles. (V. Savchuk, Trans., Ed.). Saint Petersburg: Publishing house of the Russian Christian Academy of Humanities. (In Russian).
Kundera, M. (2002). Immortality. (N. Shulgina, Trans.). Saint Petersburg: Azbuka-classica. (In Russian).
Land, N. (2012). Fanged Noumena. Collected writings 1987–2007. UK: Urbanomic; Sequence Press.
Miller, J.-A. (2017). Introduction to the Clinic of Lacanian Psychoanalysis. Nine Spanish Lectures. (N. Muravyeva, Trans.). Moscow: Logos; Gnosis, project letterra.org. (In Russian).
Nietzsche, F. (2002). Beyond Good and Evil, On the Genealogy of Morality. (A. Onyshko, Trans.). Lviv: Litopys. (Original work published 1886). (In Ukrainian).
Perepelytsia, O. M. (2016). Being and Enjoyment: from Descartes’ Subject of Cogito to Sade’s Subject of Imago. Sententiae, 2, 82–93. (In Ukrainian).
Vetlesen, A. J. (2009). A Philosophy of Pain. London: Reaktion Books Ltd.
Yates, F. A. (1997). The Art of Memory. (E. V. Malyshkin, Trans.). Saint Petersburg: Universitetskaya kniga. (In Russian).
Амери Ж. По ту сторону преступления и наказания: Попытки одоленного одолеть / пер. с нем. И. Эбаноидзе. Москва: Новое издательство, 2015. 200 с.
Достоевский Ф. М. Преступление и наказание. Полное собрание сочинений: в 30-ти т.; т. 6. Ленинград: Наука, 1973. 422 с.
Йейтс Ф. Искусство памяти / пер. с англ. Е. В. Малышкина. Санкт-Петербург: Фонд поддержки науки и образования «Университетская книга», 1997. 479 с.
Кампер Д. Знаки как шрамы. Графизм боли. Кампер Д. Тело. Насилие. Боль: сборник статей / пер. с нем. и общ. ред. В. Савчука. Санкт-Петербург: Изд-во Русской христианской гуманитарной академии, 2010. С. 30–46.
Кундера М. Бессмертие: Роман / пер. с. чеш. Н. Шульгиной. Санкт-Петербург: Азбука-классика, 2002. 384 с.
Миллер Ж.-А. Введение в клинику лакановского психоанализа. Девять испанских лекций / пер. с исп. Н. Муравьева. Москва: Логос; Гнозис, проект letterra.org, 2017. 184 с.
Ніцше Ф. По той бік добра і зла. Генеалогія моралі / пер. з нім. А. Онишко. Львів: Літопис, 2002. С. 185-319.
Перепелиця О. М. Буття і насолода: від суб’єкта cogito Декарта до суб’єкта imago де Сада. Sententiae. 2016. № 2. С. 82–93.
Фуко M. Надзирать и наказывать. Рождение тюрьмы / пер. с фр. В. Наумова. Mосква: Ad Marginem, 1999. 479 с.
Хайдеггер М. Что это такое – философия? Вопросы философии. 1993. № 8. С. 113–123.
Abramović M. Walk Through Walls: A Memoir. New York: Crown Archetype, 2016. 384 [293] p.
Corns J. (Ed.). Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Pain. London; New York: Routledge. 2017. 456 p.
Fisher M. Good For Nothing [Electronic resource]. 2014, March 19. URL: https://theoccupiedtimes.org/?p=12841.
Land N. Fanged Noumena. Collected writings 1987–2007. UK: Urbanomic; Sequence Press, 2012. 666 p.
Vetlesen A. J. A Philosophy of Pain / English trans. John Irons. London: Reaktion Books Ltd, 2009. 167 p.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication of this work under the terms of a license Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.