DIGITAL CULTURE IN MODERN UKRAINE: PHILOSOPHICAL DIMENSIONS OF THE FOURTH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION IN THE CONTEXT OF NATIONAL IDENTITY PROBLEMS

Keywords: digital culture, Ukraine, philosophy of culture, philosophical anthropology, national identity, Industry 4.0, digital sovereignty, nationalism, data ethics, information warfare, trust

Abstract

A new approach to the analysis of the digital culture of modern Ukraine is proposed as a space of intersection of technological modernization, conditioned by the logic of the fourth industrial revolution, and state-building practices of Ukrainian national identity. The purpose of the study is to consider the philosophical dimensions of the digital culture of Ukraine in the logic of the fourth industrial revolution through the problem of national identity, in particular, the characteristics of how digital infrastructures transform belonging, how digital social solidarity arises and consists of what ethical challenges accompany this process. Methods: analytical method, synergistic principle, holistic approaches to society, socio-philosophical analysis, theories of information and information society, elements of discourse analysis of digital media. Scientific novelty. It is proved that digitalization in Ukraine cannot be reduced to a technocratic upgrade of services: it forms new modes of belonging, solidarity, trust, and autonomy, which become part of the normative core of the national idea. Through the prism of the phenomena of digital nationalism, data as a resource of power, technological sovereignty and information warfare, it is argued that the Ukrainian case demonstrates a special type of «digital modernity under pressure»: institutional resilience and civic engagement are strengthened by digital infrastructures, but at the same time the risks of external dependence, «data colonization» and algorithmic inequality are increasing. The latest research shows how digital public services and the co-production of public services in a crisis support the trust and subjectivity of citizens; network identities in social media during war tend to strengthen intra-group solidarity; information security and regulation become an element of the political ethics of the nation. The concept of a “digital national idea” is proposed as a combination of dignity, freedom, solidarity, technological sovereignty, the rule of law and openness. Conclusions. A philosophical framework is proposed that combines: the concepts of «digitalization» and «platformization» of cultural production and the mediation of social ties; the ethics of digital governance and «soft ethics» as a tool for regulating technological systems; the issues of digital sovereignty and «data» as a resource of power; the anthropological challenges of Industry 4.0 (reformatting of labor, corporeality, agency, trust, and solidarity). Ukraine demonstrates a special type of digital modernization, where the war acted as a «critical turning point» and an accelerator of digital cooperation between the state, local communities, and civil society. It is argued that Ukraine’s digital culture is not reduced purely to «technical progress», but is a field of ethical identity choices, where national identity acquires the features of network solidarity and symbolic defense.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Olena Tytar, V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

D.Sc.in Philosophy, Professor of the

Department of Schad Theory of Culture and Philosophy of Science

V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

4, Svobody sqr., 61022, Kharkiv, Ukraine

Oksana Bulgakova, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine

Candidate of Historical Sciences, Associate Professor of Philosophy

and International Communication Department

National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine,

15 Heroiv Oborony Str., Kyiv, 03041, Ukraine

References

Bachmann, S. D. D., Putter D., Duczynski G. (2023). Hybrid warfare and disinformation: A Ukraine war perspective. Global Policy, Vol.14, n.5, p.858–869. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13257.

Brusylovska, O. & Maksymenko, I. (2023). Analysis of the media discourse on the 2022 war in Ukraine. Regional Science Policy & Practice. Vol. 15, n. 1, p. 222-236. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12579

Colombo, A. W., Karnouskos S., Hanisch C. (2021). Engineering human-focused Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems in Industry 4.0 context. Philosophical Transactions. A Math Phys Eng Sci, 4 October 2021, 379 (2207): 20200366. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0366.

Couldry, N.& Mejias, U. (2019). Making data colonialism liveable: how might data’s social order be regulated? Internet Policy Review, 8(2). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.2.1411.

Cunha, L., Silva, D., & Maggioli, S. (2022). Exploring the status of the human operator in Industry 4.0: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.889129.

Desai, A., & Manoharan, A. P. (2024). Digital Transformation and Public Administration: The Impacts of India’s Digital Public Infrastructure. International Journal of Public Administration, n.47(9), p.575–578. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2024.2350762.

Desoutter, M. (2025). War, social media and gender: visual analysis of TikTok videos depicting Ukrainian soldiers. Critical Military Studies, Vol.11, n.3, p.285-311. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1080/23337486.2025.2472100

Edler, J., Blind, K., Kroll, H. & Schubert, T. (2023). Technology sovereignty as an emerging frame for innovation policy: Defining rationales, ends and means. Research Policy, n.52(6), 104765. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104765

Floridi, L. (2014) The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. 248 p.

Floridi, L. (2018). Soft Ethics and the Governance of the Digital. Philosophy & Technology, 31, р.1–8. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0303-9

Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A Unified Framework of Five Principles for AI in Society. Harvard Data Science Review, vol.1, issue 1. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1.

Geissler, D., Bär, D., Pröllochs, N. (2023). Russian propaganda on social media during the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. EPJ Data Science, Vol.12, n.35, p.1-20. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-023-00414-5.

Gustafsson, M., Matveieva, O., Wihlborg, E., Borodin, Y., Mamatova, T., & Kvitka, S. (2025). Adaptive governance amidst the war: Overcoming challenges and strengthening collaborative digital service provision in Ukraine. Government Information Quarterly, Vol.42, n.3, 102056. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2025.102056.

Harari, Y. N. 21 Lessons for the 21st Century. London: Jonathan Cape, 2018. 368 p.

Harari, Y. N. Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow. New York: Harvill Secker, 2016. 448 p.

Ivić, S. & Troitino, D. R. (2022). Digital Sovereignty and Identity in the European Union. A Challenge for Building Europe. European Studies – the Review of European law, Economics and Politics. 2022, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 80–109. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.2478/eustu-2022-0015.

Kolodiziev, O., Shcherbak, V., Kostyshyna, T., et al. (2024). Digital transformation as a tool for creating an inclusive economy in Ukraine during wartime. Problems and Perspectives in Management, n.22(3), p.440–457. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(3).2024.34.

Kornieiev, P., Yatskevych, I. (2024). Diia City: An Innovative Legal Regime. Can Ukraine’s Legal Innovation Shape the Global Technological Landscape?. Financial Law Review, 2024, p.1-25. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.4467/22996834FLR.24.011.20920.

Kozachenko, I. (2021). Transformed by contested digital spaces? Social media and diasporic selves in the Ukraine conflict. Nations and Nationalism. Vol.27, Issue 2, p.377-392. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12707.

Kyrychenko, Y., Brik, T., van der Linden, S. & Roozenbeek, J. (2024). Social identity correlates of social media engagement before and after the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Nature Communications, n.15, 8127, p.1-11. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52179-8.

Marushchak, A., Petrov, S., & Khoperiya, A. (2025). Countering AI-powered disinformation through national regulation: learning from the case of Ukraine. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, Vol.7. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1474034

Matveieva, O., Navumau, V., Gustafsson, M. (2022). Adoption of Public e-services versus Civic Tech Services: On the Issue of Trust and Citizen Participation in Ukraine and Belarus. Janssen, M.,et al. Electronic Government. EGOV 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13391. Springer, Cham. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15086-9_2.

Mihelj, S. & Jiménez-Martínez, C. (2021). Digital nationalism: Understanding the role of digital media in the rise of “new” nationalism. Nations and Nationalism, Vol.27, n.2, p.331–346. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12685.

Munk, T. (2025). Digital Defiance: Memetic Warfare and Civic Resistance. Eur J Crim Policy Res, n.31, p.501–528. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-025-09613-4

Nieborg, D. B.& Poell, T. (2018). The platformization of cultural production. Theorizing the contingent cultural commodity. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4275–4292. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818769694.

Oleinik, A. (2025). Digital and mass media coverage of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine compared: Uniformity within countries and diversity between countries. SAGE Journals. International Communication Gazette, Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1177/17480485251357866.

Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. World Economic Forum. 172 p.

Schwab, K. (2018). Shaping the Future of the Fourth Industrial Revolution: A Guide to Building a Better World. New York: PF Penguin, 288 p.

Stiegler, B.(2015) States of Shock: Stupidity and Knowledge in the 21st Century. Trans. D. Ross. Cambridge-Oxford-Boston-New York: Polity Press. 288 p.

Taranenko, A. (2024). Ensuring information security: Countering Russian disinformation in Ukrainian speeches delivered at the United Nations. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, Vol. 10, 2024, 100987. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100987.

Twizeyimana, J. D., & Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of E-Government -A literature review. Government Information Quarterly, vol.36, n.2, p. 167–178. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.001.

Wu, X. K., Gu, G., Xie, TT. (2024). Unveiling evolving nationalistic discourses on social media. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, n.11, p.1-12, 998. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03425-3

Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: PublicAffairs 704 p.

Published
2025-11-24
Cited
How to Cite
Tytar, O., & Bulgakova, O. (2025). DIGITAL CULTURE IN MODERN UKRAINE: PHILOSOPHICAL DIMENSIONS OF THE FOURTH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION IN THE CONTEXT OF NATIONAL IDENTITY PROBLEMS. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series Philosophy. Philosophical Peripeteias, (73), 151-160. https://doi.org/10.26565/2226-0994-2025-73-13
Section
Articles