NEW PARADIGMS OF PHILOSOPHICAL ANTHROPOLOGY IN THE CONTEXT OF MODERN SCIENCE AND EDUCATION: SYNTHESIS OF EXISTENTIALISM, PERSONALISM AND DIALOGICAL APPROACH

Keywords: philosophical anthropology, being, identity, existentialism, personalism, philosophy of dialogue, self-knowledge, anthropocentrism, secularization, ontology, modernization, intersubjectivity

Abstract

The article deals with the issues of understanding human existence in the context of post-nonclassical philosophy, where value-semantic, communicative and existential aspects acquire special importance. The main attention is focused on the processes of self-knowledge, existential choice, identity formation and transformation of subjectivity in conditions of rapid social and cultural changes. The study uses methods of phenomenology, hermeneutics, as well as historical and philosophical comparability to study the strategies of understanding human existence that arise within the framework of post-nonclassical philosophy. It is shown that the anthropological paradigm is transforming from metaphysical objectivity to an emphasis on personal experience, interpersonal dialogue and processes of personality formation. Particular attention is paid to the influence of the significant phenomena of modernity - cultural fragmentation, moral relativism, loss of stable identities - on the formation of a new type of anthropological thinking. The focus of the analysis is the transition from a one-dimensional to a multidimensional model of man, in which intersubjectivity, reflection and responsibility play an important role. The originality of the approach lies in the synthesis of ideas of existentialism, personalism, philosophy of dialogue and post-non-classical concepts of the subject. It is concluded that philosophical anthropology in the post-non-classical era becomes a key tool for interpreting man as an open, dynamic being who is in a constant search for meaning. The results of the study can be used to form new concepts of human development, education, intercultural interaction and ethical responsibility within the framework of modern humanitarian knowledge. The analysis of post-nonclassical approaches reveals that modern philosophy of anthropology departs from classical rationalist and metaphysical models, offering a more complex view of man. This opens up new prospects for interdisciplinary research that takes into account cultural, social, and psychological aspects of being. Special emphasis is placed on dialogue and communication, which allows us to rethink traditional notions of identity as a static category, emphasizing its dynamic, constitutive nature instead. Thus, post-nonclassical philosophy of anthropology acts as a platform for the formation of ethical models that take into account the complexity and multiplicity of human experience, contributing to overcoming the one-dimensional approaches that dominated previously. Such an approach is especially relevant in the context of globalization processes and cultural diversity, which pose new challenges to philosophy and opens up opportunities for its development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Hanna Yemelianenko, SHEI «Donbas State Pedagogical University»

Yemelianenko Hanna D.

Doctor of Philosophy Sciences, Professor

Professor of the Department of Philosophy, History and Social-Humanitarian Disciplines

SHEI «Donbas State Pedagogical University»

13 Naukova Str., Dnipro, 49020, Ukraine

Olga Radziievska, SHEI «Donbas State Pedagogical University»

Radziievska Olga V.

Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor

Associate Professor of the Department of Foreign Languages

SHEI «Donbas State Pedagogical University»

13 Naukova Str., Dnipro, 49020, Ukraine

Larіsa Abyzova, SHEI «Donbas State Pedagogical University»

Abyzova Larіsa V.

Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of Philosophy, History and Social-Humanitarian Disciplines

SHEI «Donbas State Pedagogical University»

13 Naukova Street, Dnipro, 49020, Ukraine

Oleksii Kivin, Ukrainian State University named after Mykhailo Drahomanov

Kivin Oleksii M.

PhD student of the Department of Philosophy

Ukrainian State University named after Mykhailo Drahomanov

9 Pyrohova Str., Kyiv, 01030, Ukraine

References

Zahorodniuk, V. (2023). Human Identity: A Given Thing or a Problem (pp. 8-23). Human Identity: A Philosophical and Anthropological Analysis. Monograph / Editor-in-Chief V.P. Zahorodniuk. Kyiv: H. S. Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy. [In Ukrainian].

Human Identity: A Philosophical and Anthropological Analysis. Monograph. (2023). / Editor-in-Chief V.P. Zahorodniuk. Kyiv: H. S. Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy. [In Ukrainian].

Mozghovyi L.I. (2013). Anthropomystical constants in the structure of the worldview (historical and philosophical analysis): monograph / Ed. 3rd, revised and supplemented. Slavyansk: Drukarskyi dvir. [In Ukrainian].

National resilience of Ukraine: hybrid threats challenge response and prevention strategy: national report (2022). Ed. count. S. I. Pyrozhkov, O. M. Mayboroda, N. V. Khamitov, E. I. Golovakha, S. S. Dembitsky, V. A. Smoliy, O. V. Skrypnyuk, S. V. Stoetsky / Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studiesof the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Kyiv. URL: https://ipiend.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/nats_dopovyd.pdf [In Ukrainian].

Yemelyanenko H. (2018). Philosophical foundations of existential theology (anthropological, ontological and epistemological aspects): [monograph]. Kyiv: Autograph. [In Ukrainian].

Khamitov N.V. (2022). Academic philosophy as science and art. Visnyk of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 4, 59-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/visn2022.04.059 [In Ukrainian].

Khamitov N.V. (2023). Transformations of identity in the existence of modern man: the problem of worldview choice (pp. 109-133). Human Identity: A Philosophical and Anthropological Analysis. Monograph. (2023). / Editor-in-Chief V.P. Zahorodniuk. Kyiv: H. S. Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy. [In Ukrainian].

Khamitov N.V. (2021). Philosophical anthropology: world and domestic contexts. Visnyk of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 5, 81-94. https://doi.org/10.15407/visn2021.05.081 [In Ukrainian].

Pattison, G. (2004). Kierkegaard and the Theology of the Nineteenth Century: the Paradox and the «Point of Contact». Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, рр. 257. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139088237

Royal, R. А. (2015). Deeper Vision: The Catholic Intellectual Tradition in the Twentieth Century San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 591 р.

Søren Kierkegaard in оur time: problems and prospects of modern Philosophy and religious studies. (2015). Selected Multilingual Proceedings of the International Conference celebrating the 200th anniversary of the birth of Søren Kierkegaard. Plovdyv-Nitra- Kyiv: Propeller Prepress, 124 р.

Westphal, M. (2014). Kierkegaard's Concept of Faith (Kierkegaard as a Christian Thinker). Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 294 p.

Westphal, M. (2001). Overcoming Onto-theology: towardapost modern Christian Faith. New York: Fordham University Press, 306 р. DOI: 10.1515/9780823238057.

Published
2025-06-30
Cited
How to Cite
Yemelianenko, H., Radziievska, O., Abyzova, L., & Kivin, O. (2025). NEW PARADIGMS OF PHILOSOPHICAL ANTHROPOLOGY IN THE CONTEXT OF MODERN SCIENCE AND EDUCATION: SYNTHESIS OF EXISTENTIALISM, PERSONALISM AND DIALOGICAL APPROACH. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series Philosophy. Philosophical Peripeteias, (72), 254-261. https://doi.org/10.26565/2226-0994-2025-72-24
Section
Articles