Ecological status assessment of fishery water bodies in relation to ecosystem service provision

Keywords: ecological status, water quality, fishery water bodies, ecosystem services, sustainable development

Abstract

Purpose. To assess the ecological status of fishery water bodies in the context of ecosystem service provision based on the analysis of key hydrochemical indicators and determination of their influence on the functioning of aquatic ecosystems.

Methods. Analytical, computational, and comparative methods, hydrochemical analysis, and ecological classification methods for assessing water quality in fishery water bodies.

Results. The ecological status of a fishery technological water body was assessed in the context of ecosystem service provision based on the analysis of key hydrochemical indicators. It was found that most of the studied parameters correspond to water quality classes II–III, indicating an overall good to satisfactory condition of the aquatic environment. Supporting ecosystem services are realized at high and satisfactory levels due to the stability of the acid–base regime and adequate oxygen conditions. Regulating services related to self-purification processes and nutrient cycling are predominantly provided at a satisfactory level, reflecting a moderate level of organic loading. Provisioning ecosystem services are also characterized by a satisfactory level, indicating the preservation of water suitability for fishery use. At the same time, certain deviations were identified, particularly elevated concentrations of total iron, which may affect the functioning of the aquatic ecosystem. The generalization of results based on block indices revealed a transitional character of water quality between good and satisfactory conditions.

Conclusions. Assessing the ecological status of fishery water bodies through the lens of ecosystem services enables the integration of water quality characteristics with the analysis of ecosystem functioning. The ecological status directly determines the effectiveness of supporting, regulating, and provisioning ecosystem services, while certain hydrochemical indicators may act as limiting factors for their full realization. The proposed approach provides an opportunity for a more comprehensive assessment of fishery water bodies and can be used to improve monitoring systems and water resource management based on the ecosystem approach and principles of sustainable development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

O. A. Karaim, Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University, 13, Voli Ave., Lutsk, Volyn region, 43025, Ukraine

PhD (Economics), Associate Prof., Associate Professor of the Department of Ecology and Protection of Environment,

 

O. O. Biedunkova, National University of Water and Environmental Engineering, 11, Soborna St., Rivne, 33000, Ukraine

DSc (Biology), Prof.Professor of the Department of Ecology, Environmental Protection Technologies and Forestry,

O. O. Tsos, Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University, 13, Voli Ave., Lutsk, Volyn region, 43025, Ukraine

PhD (Agricultural Sciences), Associate Prof., Associate Professor of the Department of Ecology and Protection of Environment

Z. V. Lavrynyuk, Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University, 13, Voli Ave., Lutsk, Volyn region, 43025, Ukraine

PhD (Chemistry), Associate Prof., Associate Professor of the Department of Ecology and Protection of Environment

References

MAWeb.org. Ecosystems. Retrieved from https://maweb.org/ecosystems/

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (n.d.). Overview of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Re-trieved from https://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/About.html

Remme, R. P., Meacham, M., Pellowe, K. E., Andersson, E., Guerry, A. D., Janke, B., Liu, L., Lonsdorf, E., Li, M., Mao, Y., Nootenboom, C., Wu, T., & van Oudenhoven, A. P. E. (2024). Aligning nature-based solutions with ecosystem services in the urban century. Ecosystem Services, 66, 101610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101610

IPBES. Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Retrieved from https://www.ipbes.net/global-assessment

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Fisheries and aquaculture division. Re-trieved from https://www.fao.org/fishery-divisional-structure/en

Halimova, V. M., & Kalka, N. T. (2021). Water quality control for fish farming Proceedings of the IV International Science Conference “Actual problems of practice and science” (p. 19). Ankara, Turkey.

Institute of Fisheries of the NAAS. Retrieved from https://if.org.ua/index.php/uk/ (in Ukrainian).

Dombrovskyi, K. O., & Yeremenko, T. S. (2023). Assessment of ecosystem components of a fishery pond. Ecological Sciences, 6–51, 39–43. https://doi.org/10.32846/2306-9716/2023.eco.6-51.6 (in Ukrainian).

Karaim, O. A., Karaim, V. P., Biedunkova, O. O., Lavryniuk, Z. V., & Dzham, O. A. (2024). Evaluation of anthropogenic impact in the aspect of basin ecological management. Bulletin of the National University of Water and Environmental Engineering. (Agricultural Sciences Series), 1(105), 97–119. https://doi.org/10.31713/vs120247 (in Ukrainian).

Hrytsenko, A. V., Vasenko, O. H., Vernichenko, H. A. (2012). Methodology for ecological assessment of surface water quality by relevant categories. UkrNDIEP. (in Ukrainian).

On aquaculture. (2012). Law of Ukraine.Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/5293-17#Text (in Ukrainian).

On approval of Methodological recommendations for the development of standards for maximum permissible discharge of pollutants into water bodies with return waters. Order of the Ministry of Environment No. 173 of 05.03.2021. (2021). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/v0173926-21#Text (in Ukrainian).

On fisheries, industrial fishing and protection of aquatic biological resources. (2011). Law of UkraineRetrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3677-17#Text (in Ukrainian).

Deng, Y., Zou, M., Liu, W., et al. (2023). Antibiotic removal and microbial response mechanism in constructed wetlands treating aquaculture wastewater containing veterinary drugs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 394, 136271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136271

Han, Z., Guo, N., Yan, H., et al. (2021). Recovery of phosphate, magnesium and ammonium from eutrophic water by struvite biomineralization through free and immobilized Bacillus cereus MRR2. Journal of Cleaner Production, 320, 128796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128796

Huang, J., Xiao, Y., & Chen, B. (2023). Nutrients removal by Olivibacter jilunii immobilized on activated carbon for aquaculture wastewater treatment: ppk1 gene and bacterial community structure. Bioresource Technology, 370, 128494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.128494

Iber, B. T., Okomoda, V. T., Rozaimah, S. A., & Kasan, N. A. (2021). Eco-friendly approaches to aquaculture wastewater treatment: Assessment of natural coagulants vis-à-vis chitosan. Bioresource Technology Reports, 15, 100702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100702

Kang, W., Li, L., Wu, S., et al. (2023). Development of a scalable electrochemical filter for removing nitrate from recirculating aquaculture saltwater. Journal of Cleaner Production, 391, 136069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136069

Kurniawan, S. B., Imron, M. F., Abdullah, S. R. S., et al. (2023). Coagulation–flocculation of aquaculture effluent using biobased flocculant: From artificial to real wastewater optimization by response surface methodology. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 53, 103869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.103869

Tan, W. K., Cheah, S. C., Parthasarathy, S., et al. (2021). Fish pond water treatment using ultrasonic cavitation and advanced oxidation processes. Chemosphere, 274, 129702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129702

Kashem, A. H. M., Das, P., Hawari, A. H., et al. (2023). Aquaculture from inland fish cultivation to wastewater treatment: A review. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology, 22, 969–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-023-09672-1

Thomas, M., Pasquet, A., Aubin, J., et al. (2021). When more is more: Taking advantage of species diversity to move towards sustainable aquaculture. Biological Reviews, 96, 767–784. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12677

Passport of a fishery technological reservoir (143.2258 ha) (2019). Lutsk. (in Ukrainian)

Published
2026-05-30
How to Cite
Karaim, O. A., Biedunkova, O. O., Tsos, O. O., & Lavrynyuk, Z. V. (2026). Ecological status assessment of fishery water bodies in relation to ecosystem service provision. Man and Environment. Issues of Neoecology, (45), 55-66. https://doi.org/10.26565/1992-4224-2026-45-05