Ecosystem services of "Zagrebell" regional landscape park in the urbanized environment of Ternopol: conceptual frameworks, approaches to assessment
Abstract
Purpose. To consider the problem of the lack of a regulated regulatory and legal environment, complex methods and systematic practices of ecosystem services assessment in Ukraine.
Results. The problem of the lack of a regulated regulatory and legal environment, complex methods and systematic practices of evaluating ecosystem services in Ukraine is considered. An assessment of the value of these services for the urban ecosystem of Ternopil was carried out using the materials of the regional landscape park "Zagrebellya". It was noted that the annual cost of ecosystem services is 16 billion 586 million 627 thousand 610 UAH. For comparison, the annual budget of Ternopil is UAH 3.3967 billion. (2024). Such a comparison is evidence that the cost of ecosystem services of natural landscapes of the RLP is not only 4.9 times higher than the annual budget of the city. These services are directly consumed by people and are primarily beneficial to local residents, because they are the ones who receive them, and if they sell them on, they become an intermediary between ecosystems and the end users of their services. Competent use of this group of services is an important window of opportunity for each of the territorial communities. In the future, it is important to implement the category "ecosystem service" in the legislative and other normative legal acts of Ukraine and to develop and implement payments for ecosystem services in the practice of budget planning.
Conclusion. Ukraine faces the needs of modern modernization of the principles of sustainable development and inclusion in the development processes of ecosystem management. It can take place only on the basis of Ukraine's involvement in international trends of inclusion of natural ecosystem services in the mechanisms of sustainable development, which requires an appropriate economic assessment of these services. In the future, it is important to implement the category "ecosystem service" in the legislative and other normative legal acts of Ukraine and to develop and implement payments for ecosystem services in the practice of budget planning
Downloads
References
Zavadovych, O. (2000). Aspects and problems of the functioning of nature conservation institutions of local importance" (on the example of the regional landscape park "Znesinnia" in Lviv). Proceedings of the International Science and Practice Conf.: Problems and prospects of the development of nature conservation objects in Roztochchi. Lviv: Logos, 35-40.
Zavadovych, O., Zakharko, E., Shvadchak, B., & Yamelynets, T. (1999). Information system of the regional landscape park "Znesinnia". Proceedings of the International Science and Practice Conf.: Geoinformation technologies today, Lviv. 37.
Koynova, I., & Zavadovych, O. (2005). Features of functioning and possibilities of balanced development of regional landscape park "Znesinnia".Visnyk Lviv University. Series Geographical, 32, 121-129. Retrieved from http://publications.lnu.edu.ua/bulletins/index.php/geography/article/view/3231/3289
Tsaryk L., & Pozniak, I. (2016). To the problem of greening and the role of park complexes in the functioning of the urban ecosystem of Ternopil. Scientific notes of TNPU. Series: Geography, (1), 263-270. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/NZTNPUg_2016_1_39
Tsaryk, P.L., & Tsaryk, L.P. (2013). Regional landscape park "Zagrebellya" in the system of protected and recreational nature use. Monograph. Ternopil: Editorial and publishing department of TNPU named after V. Hnatyuk.
Chernyuk, A., Tsaryk, L., & Tsaryk, P. (2015). The morphological structure of the landscapes of the "Zagrebella" RLP and their transformational changes. Scientific notes of TNPU. Series Geography, (2), 32-37. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/NZTNPUg_2015_2_8
Ekosystemni posluhy rehionalnoho landshaftnoho parku «Znesinnia». Doslidzhennia. (2019). Lviv. Retrieved from https://epl.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Ekosystemni-poslugy-RLP-Znesinnya.pdf
Shtyk, Yu.V. (2021). Peculiarities of accounting for ecosystem services in Ukraine. Scientific Bulletin of the International Humanitarian University, 51(5), 43-49. https://doi.org/10.32841/2413-2675/2021-51-5
Shtyk, Yu. V. (2021). Peculiarities of assessment of ecosystem services: formation of an integral indicator. Retrieved from https://repo.btu.kharkov.ua/bitstream/123456789/21709/1/t-k_23.04.21-170-173.pdf
Shtyk, Yu. V. (2022). Formation and development of the ecosystem services market in Ukraine. Economic space, (180), 159-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2224-6282/180-26
Vasylyuk, O., & Ilminska, L. (2020). Ecosystem services. Review. BO "BF "Biodiversity Protection Fund of Ukraine". Retrieved from https://uncg.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/EcoPoslugy_web_new.pdf
Chebolda І. Y., & Kuzyk, I. R. (2023). Assessment of intangible ecosystem services of the Ternopil region forests. Visnyk of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University Series «Еcоlogy», (28), 91-100. https://doi.org/10.26565/1992-4259-2023-28-08
Maksymenko , N. V., Voronin, V. O., & Burchenko, S. V. (2023). Geoecological assessment of forest landscapes as a basis for the evaluation of ecosystem services. Visnyk of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University Series «Еcоlogy», (29), 37-47. https://doi.org/10.26565/1992-4259-2023-29-04
Pistón N., Silva Filho D.S.E., Dias A.T.C. Social inequality deeply affects people’s perception of eco-system services and disservices provided by street trees. Ecosystem Services. 2022. Vol. 58. 101480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101480
Varukha, A. (2022). An overview of approaches to the assessment of ecosystem services through the prism of their application to determine the damage caused by the military actions of the Russian Federation on the territory of Ukraine. Lviv: "Manuscript Company". (In Ukrainian)
Lyu, R., Zhao, W., Pang, J., Tian, X. , Zhang, J., & Wang, N. (2022). Towards a sustainable nature reserve management: Using Bayesian network to quantify the threat of disturbance to ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 58, 101483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101483
Kazantsev T., Halaim O., Vasylyuk O., Filipovych V., & Krylova G. (2016). Adaptation to climate change: green zones are worth the coolness. Kyiv: Green Wave. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323016606_Kazancev_T_Halaim_O_Vasiluk_O_Filipovic_V_Krilova_G_Adaptacia_do_zmin_klimatu_zeleni_zoni_na_varti_proholodi_-_K_Zelena_Hvila_2016_-_40_s
Farley, J. (2012). Ecosystem services: The economics debate. Ecosystem Services. 1(1), 40-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.002
Costanza, R. (1997). The value of the worlds ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253-260. Retrieved from www.esd.ornl.gov/benefits_conference/nature_paper.pdf
Lukyanchikov, N.N. (2011). Economy and organization of nature management. M.: UNITY-DANA.
Folke, C., Colding, J., Olsson, P. & Hahn, T. (2007). Integrated Social-Ecological Systems and Adaptive Governance of Ecosystem Services. In: Pretty, J., A. Ball, T. Benton, J. Guivant, D. Lee, D. Orr, M. Pfef-fer and H. Ward (Eds). Sage Handbook on Environment and Society, Chapter 37: 536-552. Sage Publi-cations, London. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607873
Folke, C. (2016). Resilience (Republished). Ecology and Society, 21(4), 44. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09088-210444
Folke, C., Haider, J., Lade, S., Norström A., & J. Rocha. (2021). Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems: A Handful of Frontiers. Global Environmental Change. Vol. 71. 102400 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102400
Finlayson, C. M., & Aladin, N. V. (2005). Inland Water Systems. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Current State and Trends. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265038948
Sedell, J., Sharpe, M., Dravnieks Apple, D., Copenhagen, M., & Furniss, M. (2000). Water and the Forest Service. FS-660. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DC. Re-trieved from https://www.fs.fed.us/sites/default/files/legacy_files/media/types/publi cation/field_pdf/water-forest-service-01-2000.pdf
Ecosystems and Human Well_being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf
Structure of the Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES). (2024). Re-trieved from https://cices.eu/cices-structure/
TEEB (2010). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. Retrieved from http://www.biodiversity.ru/programs/international/teeb/materials_teeb/TEEB_SynthReport_English.pdf
ForCES – Forest Certification for Ecosystem Services – A groundbreaking pilot project to expand FSC’s scope and relevance. (2014). Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/CIFOR/fa-fsc-al
Copyright (c) 2024 Tsaryk L. P., Tsaryk P. L.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors reserve the right of attribution for the submitted manuscript, while transferring to the Journal the right to publish the article under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). This license allows free distribution of the published work under the condition of proper attribution of the original authors and the initial publication source (i.e. the Journal)
Authors have the right to enter into separate agreements for additional non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form it was published in the Journal (such as publishing the article on the institutional website or as a part of a monograph), provided the original publication in this Journal is properly referenced
The Journal allows and encourages online publication of the manuscripts (such as on personal web pages), even when such a manuscript is still under editorial consideration, since it allows for a productive scientific discussion and better citation dynamics (see The Effect of Open Access).
