Fiscal sustainability and public resource management in the context of recovery: international experience
Abstract
Fiscal sustainability is a key condition for economic recovery in the context of hostilities and post-war development. For Ukraine, where the budget system has become one of the main instruments of sustainability during a large-scale war, the issue of fiscal policy is gaining relevance. Therefore, the relevance of the topic of the article is due to the realities of the Ukrainian economy and the urgent need to build fiscal sustainability of the country now and soon. The object of the study is the key steps of these countries aimed at economic recovery, tax system reform and the introduction of institutional mechanisms of budgetary discipline.
Problem statement. Despite significant international support and adaptation of Ukraine's domestic policy to rapidly changing realities, the task of maintaining fiscal sustainability in conditions of high uncertainty remains difficult. As for many countries that have experienced conflicts, a dilemma arises between the need to finance recovery and ensuring debt stability in the long term. At the same time, an extremely important element of the recovery and balancing system is minimizing costs and maximizing the effect.
Unresolved aspects of the problem. Previous studies have mostly focused on issues of fiscal consolidation or public debt management, but insufficient attention has been paid to the coordination of post-war fiscal policy with the institutional capabilities of the state. There is also a noticeable lack of comparative analysis of the experience of European countries in adapting individual reforms to existing initiatives.
Purpose of the article. The purpose is to identify and systematize effective fiscal instruments for ensuring stability in the post-war period based on the experience of France, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Latvia, and Poland, and to adapt them to Ukraine’s context.
Presentation of the main material. The research applies comparative, structural-logical, and content analysis methods to examine fiscal reforms, institutional innovations, and budgetary practices in post-conflict European states. The findings highlight that fiscal sustainability depends on constitutional debt limits, medium-term expenditure frameworks, independent fiscal councils, and transparent management of reconstruction funds. Achieving fiscal resilience in Ukraine requires institutionalizing fiscal rules, enhancing medium-term budgeting, strengthening fiscal oversight, and ensuring accountability in the use of international aid.
Conclusions. A comparative analysis of the main indicators of public debt and budget deficit in selected countries allowed us to draw practical conclusions regarding the possibilities of adapting the main approaches to modern conditions in Ukraine, in particular in the direction of digitalization and strengthening the administration of individual fiscal mechanisms. The study underscores the necessity of combining domestic reform with European fiscal governance standards to secure long-term stability and investor confidence.
Downloads
References
Dmytrenko, E. (2023). The financial system of Ukraine in wartime and post-war periods: Legal and security dimensions. Kyiv Journal of Law, (2), 143–148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/klj/2023.2.19 [in Ukrainian]
Zamkovyi, O. S. (2025). Fiscal policy in the system of financial and economic relations. Economics, Finance, Money Circulation and Credit. Business Inform, (3), 261–269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2025-3-261-269 [In Ukrainian]
Lunina, I. (2022). Formation of fiscal space in wartime and postwar periods. Economy and State, 4, 20–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6806.2022.4.20 [in Ukrainian]
National Bank of Ukraine. (2023). Financial Stability Report. Kyiv: NBU. Retrieved from: https://bank.gov.ua/ua/news/all/zvit-pro-finansovu-stabilnist-gruden-2023-roku [in Ukrainian]
Chugunov, I. Ya., & Nikitishin, A. O. (2019). Tax security of the state. Scientia Fructuosa, 4, 31–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31617/visnik.knute.2019(126)03
Yakovenko, R. V. (2022). Management of Ukraine’s economic system under Russian aggression. Economy and State, 3, 49–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6806.2022.3.49 [in Ukrainian]
Addison, T., Niño-Zarazúa, M., & Pirttilä, J. (2022). Fiscal policy, state building and economic development. Journal of International Development, 34(5), 905–920. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3355
Boogaard, V., Prichard, W., Milicic, N., & Benson, M. (2016). Tax revenue mobilization in conflict-affected developing countries. Working Paper 2016/155. Helsinki: UNU-WIDER. Retrieved from: https://www.ictd.ac/publication/wider-working-paper-155-2016/
Eichengreen, B. (1989). The capital levy in theory and practice. NBER Working Paper No. 3096. Retrieved from: https://www.nber.org/papers/w3096
European Commission. (2014). Convergence Programme of Poland. Brussels: European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/european_economy/2014/pdf/ee4_en.pdf
Haughton, J. (2020). Budgetary and tax policy in post-conflict reconstruction. Journal of Peace Economics, 7(3), 45–60.
International Monetary Fund. (2001). Croatia: Country Report No. 01/209. Washington, D.C.: IMF. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2001/cr01209.pdf
International Monetary Fund. (2010). Republic of Latvia: Staff report on request for stand-by arrangement. Washington, D.C.: IMF. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2010/cr10356.pdf
International Monetary Fund. (2025). Fiscal Monitor. Washington, D.C.: Fiscal Affairs Department. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/FM
Kaneva, T., Chugunov, I., Pasichnyi, M., & Nikitishin, A. (2022). Tax policy for economic recovery and sustainable development after COVID-19. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 17(2), 102–109. https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.2.11
Kyiv School of Economics. (2024). Fiscal Digest. Kyiv: KSE. https://kse.ua/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Fiscal-Digest-2024.pdf
Mauro, P., & Villafuerte, M. (2013). Past fiscal adjustments: Lessons from failures and successes. IMF Economic Review, 61(2), 379–404.
Ministry of Finance of Ukraine. (2023). Fiscal policy report 2023. Kyiv: Ministry of Finance of Ukraine. https://mof.gov.ua/storage/files/Fin%20Report%20PEACE%20UA_Eng.pdf
Musgrave, R. A. (1959). The theory of public finance. New York: McGraw-Hill.
OECD. (1995). Marshall plan data archives. Paris: OECD. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2008/09/the-marshall-plan_g1gh8e35/9789264044258-en.pdf
Ohiorhenuan, J.-F. E., & Stewart, F. (2008). Post-conflict economic recovery: Enabling local ingenuity. UNDP, Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery. https://www.un.org/Publications
Pasichnyi, M. (2024). Fiscal dominants of military financing. Scientia Fructuosa, 2, 20–37. https://doi.org/10.31617/1.2024(154)02
Presbitero, A. (2022). Post-conflict fiscal adjustments: Evidence from fragile economies. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099435412122316848/pdf/IDU043dab8f8048ab04c690a9e20a03af5879265.pdf
World Bank. (2024). Bosnia and Herzegovina country economic memorandum. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/41059
Copyright (c) 2025 FINANCIAL AND CREDIT SYSTEMS: PROSPECTS FOR DEVELOPMENT

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.