Changes in competition as a derivative of changes in business models
Abstract
The relevance of the topic of this study is determined by the active process of changes that occur in the business environment and cause the development of digital technologies and the emergence of global marketplaces such as Amazon, eBay, and Alibaba. These platforms, on the one hand, have an impact by providing access to the worldwide market for small and medium-sized enterprises. Still, on the other hand, they transform competitive mechanisms and the environment as a whole, creating new challenges for participants in bilateral markets. Traditional business models, despite their relevance, need adaptation and a new theoretical understanding.
The purpose of the article is to analyze the impact of global marketplaces on competition and determine the structure of this multi-level interaction mechanism. The object of the study is the interaction between global marketplaces and traditional business models, as well as their impact on the competitive behavior of enterprises in the conditions of the modern digital market.
The methodological basis of the research is the analysis of recent scientific articles, empirical studies, and examples that allow us to obtain a general understanding of new market dynamics in modern conditions. The results show that competition in marketplaces has a complex multi-level character. The competitive structure includes macro, meso, and micro levels with technologies dominating each. The integration of digital technologies, process optimization, and the use of big data are key drivers of competitive advantages.
The research conducted a general analysis of the structure of competition on global marketplaces such as Amazon, Alibaba, and eBay, which revealed its multi-level nature. Special attention is paid to the influence of digital technologies at various levels. A digital business model was determined and the results were systematized in the form of diagrams and drawings for a better understanding of the structure and dynamics of competition. Changes in business models are explained as derived from changes in competition mechanisms.
The practical value of the obtained results lies in the formation of a more systematic understanding of changes in the mechanisms of competitive struggle in modern conditions and transformations of business models based on them. This makes it possible to develop recommendations for businesses at different levels of competition, regarding the implementation of current business practices that meet the modern challenges of digital marketplaces and the nature of interaction with them.
The purpose of the article is to analyze the impact of global marketplaces on competition and determine the structure of this multi-level interaction mechanism. The object of the study is the interaction between global marketplaces and traditional business models, as well as their impact on the competitive behavior of enterprises in the conditions of the modern digital market.
The methodological basis of the research is the analysis of recent scientific articles, empirical studies, and examples that allow us to obtain a general understanding of new market dynamics in modern conditions. The results show that competition in marketplaces has a complex multi-level character. The competitive structure includes macro, meso, and micro levels with technologies dominating each. The integration of digital technologies, process optimization, and the use of big data are key drivers of competitive advantages.
The research conducted a general analysis of the structure of competition on global marketplaces such as Amazon, Alibaba, and eBay, which revealed its multi-level nature. Special attention is paid to the influence of digital technologies at various levels. A digital business model was determined and the results were systematized in the form of diagrams and drawings for a better understanding of the structure and dynamics of competition. Changes in business models are explained as derived from changes in competition mechanisms.
The practical value of the obtained results lies in the formation of a more systematic understanding of changes in the mechanisms of competitive struggle in modern conditions and transformations of business models based on them. This makes it possible to develop recommendations for businesses at different levels of competition, regarding the implementation of current business practices that meet the modern challenges of digital marketplaces and the nature of interaction with them.
Downloads
References
Acs, Z. J., Song, A. K., & Szerb, L. (2021). The evolution of the global digital platform economy: 1971–2021. Small Business Economics. 57(4). 1629–1659. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00561-x
Amazon scooped up data from its own sellers to launch competing products. Fox Business. Retrieved from https://www.foxbusiness.com/retail/amazon-scooped-up-data-from-its-own-sellers-to-launch-competing-products
Ames, D., Coyne, J., & Kim, K. (2020). The impact of life cycle stage on firm acquisitions. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management. 28(2). 223–241. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-02-2019-0027
Aversa, P., Haefliger, S., Hueller, F., & Reza, D. (2020). Customer complementarity in the digital space: Exploring Amazon’s business model diversification. Long Range Planning. 53(6). Article 101985. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2020.101985
Belleflamme, P., & Peitz, M. (2010). Industrial organization: Markets and strategies. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227389823
Bharucha, J. (2016). A review of monopolistic competition among Internet service providers. International Journal of Current Research and Review. 8(19). 29–34. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320214910
Bouwman, H., Nikou, S., & de Reuver, M. (2019). Digitalization, business models, and SMEs: How do business model innovation practices improve performance of digitalizing SMEs? Telecommunications Policy. 43(9). Article 101828. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TELPOL.2019.101828
Brynjolfsson, E., Hu, Y. J., & Smith, M. D. (2003). Consumer surplus in the digital economy: Estimating the value of increased product variety at online booksellers. Management Science. 49(11). 1580–1596. Retrieved from https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/3516
Chen, L., Mislove, A., & Wilson, C. (2016). An empirical analysis of algorithmic pricing on Amazon Marketplace. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web. Retrieved from https://mislove.org/publications/Amazon-WWW.pdf
Cusumano, M. A., Gawer, A., & Yoffie, D. B. (2019). The business of platforms: Strategy in the age of digital competition, innovation, and power. Harper Business.
Deloitte. (2024). Future of retail: Profitable growth through technology and AI. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/in/Documents/consumer-business/in-cb-future-of-retail-profitable-growth-through-technology-and-AI-noexp.pdf
Digital transformation and its implications on organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior Research. 2(1). Article 340873. Retrieved from https://ibimapublishing.com/articles/JEURB/2018/340873/
Eden, A., et al. (2023). Platform equilibrium: Analyzing social welfare in online marketplaces. arXiv. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.08781v3
eMarketer. (2021). Global ecommerce update 2021. Insider Intelligence. Retrieved from https://www.emarketer.com/content/global-ecommerce-forecast-2021
European Commission. (2020). Antitrust: Commission opens investigations into possible anti-competitive conduct of Amazon. European Commission. Retrieved from https://www.eeas.europa.eu/node/65602_en
European Commission. (2020). The digital economy and society index (DESI) report. European Commission. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/api/files/document/print/en/ip_21_5481/IP_21_5481_EN.pdf
Ferrigno, G., Di Paola, N., Oguntegbe, K. F., & Kraus, S. (2023). Value creation in the metaverse age: A thematic analysis of press releases. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. 29(11). 337–363. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-01-2023-0039
Gawer, A. (2021). Digital platforms’ boundaries: The interplay of firm scope, platform sides, and digital interfaces. Long Range Planning. 54(5). Article 102045. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2020.102045
Hagiu, A., & Wright, J. (2015). Multi-sided platforms. International Journal of Industrial Organization. 43. 162–174. Retrieved from https://www.hbs.edu/ris/Publication%20Files/15-037_cb5afe51-6150-4be9-ace2-39c6a8ace6d4.pdf
How to win with digital marketplaces. McKinsey & Company. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/retail/our-insights/moving-past-friend-or-foe-how-to-win-with-digital-marketplaces
Huang, M. H., & Rust, R. T. (2021). A strategic framework for artificial intelligence in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 49(1). 30–50. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-020-00749-9
Hussain, M., Javed, A., Khan, S. H., & Others. (2024). Pillars of customer retention in the services sector: Understanding the role of relationship marketing, customer satisfaction, and customer loyalty. Journal of Knowledge Economy. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02060-2
Hutter, F., Kotthoff, L., & Vanschoren, J. (2019). Automated machine learning: Methods, systems, challenges. Automated Machine Learning.
Franck, J.-U., & Peitz, M. (2023). Market power of digital platforms. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 39(1). 34–46. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grac045
Kamel, M. A. (2023). Big data analytics and market performance: The roles of customization and personalization strategies and competitive intensity. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. 36(6). 1727–1749. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-04-2022-0114
Kamalaldin, A., Linde, L., Sjödin, D., & Parida, V. (2020). Transforming provider-customer relationships in digital servitization: A relational view on digitalization. Industrial Marketing Management. 89. 306–325. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.02.004
Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1994). Systems competition and network effects. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 8(2). 93–115. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.8.2.93
Keller, K. L., & Swaminathan, V. (2020). Strategic brand management: Building, measuring, and managing brand equity (5th ed.). Pearson Education Limited. ISBN 978-0-13-489249-8
Kreiterling, C. (2023). Digital innovation and entrepreneurship: A review of challenges in competitive markets. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. 12(1). 49. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-023-00320-0
Kritzinger, W. T., & Weideman, M. (2013). Search engine optimization and pay-per-click marketing strategies. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce. 23(3). 273–286. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2003.11647517
Ledro, C., & Others. (2022). Artificial intelligence in customer relationship management: Literature review and future research directions. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. 37(13). 48–63. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-07-2021-0332
Li, F. (2024). Three approaches for winning the platform competition. California Management Review Insights. Retrieved from https://cmr.berkeley.edu/2024/01/three-approaches-for-winning-the-platform-competition/
Li, M. (2023). Do lower search costs benefit intermediaries? Review of Industrial Organization. 63(1). 1–33. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-023-09921-1
Masoud, R., & Basahel, S. (2023). The effects of digital transformation on firm performance: The role of customer experience and IT innovation. Digital. 3(2). 109–126. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3390/digital3020008
Nusri, M., Singh, R., Awais, M., & Ayomide, O. (2022). Case study of Alibaba.com (eCommerce platform evaluation). [Manuscript].
OECD. (2019). Measuring the digital transformation: A roadmap for the future. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264311992-en
Ottaway, T., Bruneau, C., & Evans, G. (2003). The impact of auction item image and buyer/seller feedback rating on electronic auctions. Journal of Computer Information Systems. 43. 56–60. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2003.11647517
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.
Porter, M. E. (2001). Strategy and the internet. Harvard Business Review. 79(3). 62–78. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2001/03/strategy-and-the-internet
Research and Markets. (2024). E-commerce market report by type (home appliances, apparel, footwear and accessories, books, cosmetics, groceries, and others), transaction (business-to-consumer, business-to-business, consumer-to-consumer, and others), and region 2024–2032. Retrieved from https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/5936227/e-commerce-market-report-type-home-appliances
Sriram, S., Chintagunta, P., & Neelamegham, R. (2006). Effects of brand preference, product attributes, and marketing mix variables in technology product markets. Marketing Science. 25(5). 440–456. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1050.0175
Schoormann, T., Schweihoff, J., Jussen, I., et al. (2023). Classification tools for business models: Status quo, comparison, and agenda. Electronic Markets. 33(1). Article 7. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-023-00639-2
Schor, J. B., Attwood-Charles, W., Cansoy, M., et al. (2020). Dependence and precarity in the platform economy. Theory and Society. 49(5–6). 833–861. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-020-09408-y
Sewpersadh, N. S. (2023). Disruptive business value models in the digital era. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. 12(1). Article 2. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-022-00252-1
Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. R. (1999). Information rules: A strategic guide to the network economy. Harvard Business Press. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5555/556670
Stone, B. (2013). The everything store: Jeff Bezos and the age of Amazon. Little, Brown and Company.
The balance between platform variety and network effects. VoxEU. Retrieved from https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/balance-between-platform-variety-and-network-effects
Tirole, J. (2017). Economics for the common good. Princeton University Press.
Varian, H. R. (2014). Intermediate microeconomics: A modern approach (9th ed.). W. W. Norton & Company. Retrieved from http://candrafajriananda.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2017/09/e-books-MICRO-INTERMEDIATE-ed9-VARIAN.pdf
Verhoef, P. C., Kannan, P. K., & Inman, J. J. (2015). From multi-channel retailing to omni-channel retailing. Journal of Retailing. 91(2). 174–181. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2015.02.005
Wang, C. (2021, April 10). China slaps Alibaba with $2.8 billion fine in anti-monopoly probe. CNBC. Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/09/china-fines-alibaba-in-anti-monopoly-probe.html
Wielgos, D. M., Homburg, C., & Kuehnl, C. (2021). Digital business capability: Its impact on firm and customer performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 49(4). 762–789. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-021-00771-5
Yoo, I., & Yi, C.-G. (2022). Economic innovation caused by digital transformation and impact on social systems. Sustainability. 14(5). Article 2600. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052600
Zhou, Y. (2022). Research on the impact of online reviews on consumer buying behaviour. SHS Web of Conferences. 148. Article 3056. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202214803056
Zhu, F., & Iansiti, M. (2012). Entry into platform-based markets. Strategic Management Journal. 33(1). 88–106. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41307416
Zhu, F., & Liu, Q. (2018). Competing with complementors: An empirical look at Amazon.com. Strategic Management Journal. 39(10). 2618–2642. Retrieved from https://www.hbs.edu/ris/Publication%20Files/amazon_2018-06-05_4a83c515-af0c-4366-9fba-8fb059d0b4f6.pdf
Copyright (c) 2024 Financial and credit systems: prospects for development

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.