Cascade Energy Transfer in Insulin Amyloid Fibrils Doped by Thioflavin T, Benzanthrone and Squarine Dyes
Abstract
The three-step Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) within the cascade of four dyes, including the classical amyloid marker Thioflavin T as a primary donor, two jumper dyes, benzanthrone ABM and squaraine SQ4, and terminal acceptor SQ1, was tested as a possible tool for detection and characterization of insulin amyloid fibrils. The results obtained confirm the occurrence of highly efficient multistep FRET (msFRET) in the chromophore ensemble in the presence of insulin fibrils formed at elevated temperature under pH 2 (InsF1) or pH 7.4, 0.15 M NaCl (InsF2), while negligible FRET efficiencies were obtained for the control unfibrillized protein, suggesting the specificity of msFRET to cross-β-sheet architecture characteristic of amyloid fibrils. Specifically, the efficiencies of FRET for the donor-acceptor pairs ThT-ABM, ABM-SQ4 and SQ4-SQ1 at maximum acceptor concentrations (~0.4 µM – 1.6 µM) were estimated to be 86%/94%, 48%/34% and 66%/32%, respectively, in the presence of InsF1/InsF2. The most significant differences between InsF1/InsF2 and the control protein were observed for the donor-acceptor pair ThT-ABM, suggesting that ABM is the key mediator in the whole process of msFRET. Assuming the isotropic rotation of the fluorophores, the average donor-acceptor distances were estimated in the presence of InsF1, yielding the values 1.3 nm, 5.3 nm, and 3.9 nm for the ThT-ABM, ABM-SQ4 and SQ4-SQ1 pairs, respectively. The obtained distances are indicative of different fibril binding sites for the chromophores in the insulin fibrils, although due to their high specificity to the fibrillar structure, the dyes are most likely to localize in the surface grooves of β-sheets running along the main axis of amyloid fibril. Remarkably, the differences in the insulin amyloid morphology can be clearly distinguished using msFRET. As evidenced from TEM, InsF2 were thinner, shorter and contained amorphous aggregates, as compared to InsF1. Thus, different amyloid formation pathways under neutral and acidic pH resulted in the changes in the dye affinity for to the fibril binding sites, and, as a consequence, in the distinct msFRET efficiencies, especially for the pair SQ4-SQ1. The ability of ThT to serve as an efficient amplifier for the two near-infrared dyes, SQ4 and SQ1, with the benzanthrone fluorophore ABM as a jumper dye, allows detection of fibrillar insulin in the optical window of the biological samples, with the Stokes shift of the four-chromophore being ca. 240 nm. The proposed msFRET-based approach can be employed not only for insulin amyloid detection but also for distinguishing between different amyloid fibril morphologies and gaining further insights into the mechanisms involved in the development of the injection-localized insulin amyloidosis.
Downloads
References
J.R. Lakowicz, Principles of fluorescent spectroscopy (Plenum, New York, 1999).
P.R. Selvin, Nature Struct. Biol. 7, 730-734 (2000), https://doi.org/10.1038/78948.
P. Wu and L. Brand, Anal. Biochem. 218, 1-13 (1994), https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1994.1134.
L.M. Loura and M. Prieto, Front. Physiol. 2, 82 (2011), https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2011.00082.
Y. Domanov, G.P. Gorbenko, Biophys. Chem. 99, 143-154 (2002), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4622(02)00143-6.
S. Buckhout-White, C. Spillmann, W.R. Algar, A. Khachatrian, J.S. Melinger, E.R. Goldman, et al. Nat. Commun. 5, 5615 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6615.
J. Hu, M. Liu, C. Zhang, ASC Nano. 13, 7191-7201 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b02679.
X. Hu, Y. Li, T. Liu, G. Zhang and S. Liu, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 7, 15551-15560 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b04025.
D. Navarathne, Y. Ner, J.G. Grote, G.A. Sotzing, Chem. Commun. (Camb). 47, 12125-12127 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1039/C1CC14416B.
G. Ulrich, C. Goze, M. Guardigli, A. Rodda and R. Ziessel, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44, 3694-3698 (2005), https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200500808.
X. Duan, S. Wang and Z. Li, Chem. Commun. 2008, 1302–1304 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1039/B717300H.
A. Aneja, N. Mathur, P.K. Bhatnagar and P.C. Mathur, J. Biol. Phys. 34, 487-493 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10867-0089107-y.
V. Raicu, J. Biol. Phys. 33, 109-127 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10867-007-9046-z.
L. He, X. Wu, J. Simone, D. Hewgill and P.E. Lipski, Nucleic Acid Res. 33, 61–73 (2005), https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gni057.
E. Galperin, V. V. Verkhusha and A. Sorkin, Nature Methods, 1, 209–217 (2004), https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth720.
P. Tinnefeld, M. Heilemann and M. Sauer, Chem. Phys. Chem 6, 217-222 (2005), https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.200400513.
B. Albinsson, J.K. Hannestad and K. Borjesson, Coordination Chemistry Reviews, 256, 2399-2413 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2012.02.024.
G. Gorbenko, V. Trusova, T. Deligeorgiev, N. Gadjev, C. Mizuguchi and H. Saito, J. Mol. Liq. 294, 111675 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2019.111675.
U. Tarabara, M. Shchuka, K. Vus, O. Zhytniakivska, V. Trusova, G. Gorbenko, N. Gadjev and T. Deligeorgiev, East European Journal of Physics, 4, 58-69 (2019), https://doi.org/10.26565/2312-4334-2019-4-06.
L.M. Loura and M. Prieto, Front. Physiol. 2, 82 (2011), https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2011.00082.
O. Zhytniakivska, V. Trusova, G. Gorbenko, E. Kirilova, G. Kirilov and P. Kinnunen, Вісник Львівського університету. Серія біологічна. 68, 279-285 (2014), http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/VLNU_biol_2014_68_30.
M. Groenning, J. Chem. Biol. 3, 1-18 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1007/s12154-009-0027-5.
A.I. Sulatskaya, A.A. Maskevich, I.M. Kuznetsova, V.N. Uversky and K.K. Turoverov, PLoS ONE, 5, e15385 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015385.
J.A. Vladimirov and G.E. Dobretsov, Флуоресцентные зонды в исследовании биологических мембран [Fluorescent probes in study of biological membranes], (Nauka, Moscow, 1980), pp. 40. (in Russian)
H.P. Oliveira, A.J. Camargo, L.G. Macedo, M.H. Gehlen and A.B. da Silva, Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 58, 3103–3111 (2002), https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-1425(02)00119-1.
L. Nielsen, R. Khurana, A. Coats, S. Frokjaer, J. Brange, S. Vyas, V.N. Uversky and A.L. Fink, Biochemistry, 40, 6036-6046 (2001), https://doi.org/10.1021/bi002555c.
J.L. Jiménez, E.J. Nettleton, M. Bouchard, C.V. Robinson, C.M. Dobson and H. Saibil, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 9196-9201 (2002), https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.142459399.
H. Yoshihara, J. Saito, A. Tanabe, T. Amada, T. Asakura, K. Kitagawa and S. Asada, J. Pharm. Sci. 105, 1419-1426 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2016.01.025.
M. Groenning, M. Norrman, J.M. Flink, M. van de Weert, J.T. Bukrinsky, G. Schluckebier and S. Frokjaer, J. Struct Biol. 159, 483-497 (2007), 10.1016/j.jsb.2007.06.004.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).