Taxonomic characteristics of landscape and recreational framework in the system of ecological urban planning

  • T. M. Kushniruk Higher Educational Institution «Podillia State University», 12, Shevchenko Str., Kamianets-Podilskyi, Khmelnytskyi Region, 32316, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3983-6070
  • O. I. Petryshche Higher Educational Institution «Podillia State University», 12, Shevchenko Str., Kamianets-Podilskyi, Khmelnytskyi Region, 32316, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9802-8006
  • V. V. Dodurych
Keywords: landscape and recreational framework, ecological urban planning, green system, urban landscape, spatial planning, sustainable environment, anthropogenic impact, terminological systematization, ecological framework

Abstract

Purpose. Systematize scientific approaches to defining the essence and structural-functional organization of the landscape-recreational framework of the city, determine its taxonomic place among other types of urban frameworks within the framework of ecological planning of territories.

Methods. Analytical, systemic-structural, comparative-terminological, and classification-generalizing methods were applied, as well as content analysis of scientific and regulatory sources governing the greening of urban development activities.

Results. An analysis of scientific approaches to interpreting the concepts of “ecological”, “natural-ecological”, “green”, and “landscape-recreational” frameworks was conducted. Their interrelationships, hierarchy, and differentiation according to the degree of anthropogenic impact were determined. An interpretation of the landscape-recreational framework as a secondary type of urban framework that combines the spatial-functional and recreational properties of the formed urban landscape was proposed. The novelty of the study lies in the clarification of the terminology and the formation of a systematic model of relationships between types of frameworks in the city structure. The practical significance of the study lies in the implementation of the concept of a landscape-recreational framework in the practice of spatial planning and environmental construction standards.

Conclusions. It has been proven that the landscape-recreational framework is a subtype of ecological, natural-ecological, or natural frameworks and acts as a structural-functional model of a sustainable urban landscape. Its implementation contributes to improving the ecological stability of urban systems, preserving biodiversity, and creating a comfortable urban environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

T. M. Kushniruk, Higher Educational Institution «Podillia State University», 12, Shevchenko Str., Kamianets-Podilskyi, Khmelnytskyi Region, 32316, Ukraine

PhD (Agriculture),  Associate Professor of the Department of Horticulture and Land Management

O. I. Petryshche, Higher Educational Institution «Podillia State University», 12, Shevchenko Str., Kamianets-Podilskyi, Khmelnytskyi Region, 32316, Ukraine

PhD (Agriculture), Associate Professor of the Department of Horticulture and Land Management

References

Law of Ukraine. On Environmental Protection. (1991). Law of Ukraine № 1268-XII. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/main/1264-12?utm

Law of Ukraine. On Improvement of Populated Areas. (2005). Law of Ukraine № 3038-VI. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2807-15/ed20110312?utm

Law of Ukraine. On Regulation of Urban Development Activities. (2011). Law of Ukraine № 3395-VI. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3038-17#Text

Law of Ukraine. On the Basic Principles (Strategy) of State Environmental Policy of Ukraine until 2030. (2019). Law of Ukraine № 2697-VIII. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2697-19#Text

Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. On Approval of the Strategy of Environmental Secu-rity and Climate Change Adaptation until 2030. (2021). Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine № 1363-2021-р. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1363-2021-%D1%80#Text

Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. On Approval of the Concept for Implementation of State Policy in the Field of Climate Change until 2030. (2024). Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine № 483-р. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/932-2016-%D1%80#Text

Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. On Approval of DBN B.2.2-12:2019 Planning and Development of Territories. (2019). Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine № 104. (DBN B.2.2-12:2019). Re-trieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/v0104858-19?utm

Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. On Approval of Methodological Recommendations for the Development of Local Programs for the Development and Conservation of Green Spaces. (2010). Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine № 466. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/v0466738-10#Text

Zhou, Z. (2025). Classification of landscape architecture design based on dual-channel attention im-proved FCN. Systems and Soft Computing, 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sasc.2025.200280

Huang, B. (2025). Climate-driven transformations: A framework for the sustainable urban landscape system to enhance heat resilience. Sustainable Cities and Society, 131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2025.106684

Shiri, Z. (2025). Landscape approaches for sustainable land systems: A critical systematic review of frameworks, governance, and socio-ecological outcomes. Landscape Architecture and Sustainability, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.las.2025.100007

Vorobiov, V. V., & Shylo, O. S. (2021). Ecologized city and ecological city: Similarities and differ-ences. Ukrainian Journal of Construction and Architecture, 3(003), 62–75. https://doi.org/10.30838/J.BPSACEA.2312.010721.62.768

Luka, N. (2023). Walking beyond the city? On the importance of recreational mobilities for landscape planning, urban design, and public policy. Mobilities, 18(5), 789–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2023.2242001

Tsaryk, L. P., Kuzyk, I. R., & Tsaryk, P. L. (2022). Assessment of the natural-recreational potential of the Ternopil city territorial community. Education and Science of Today: Intersectoral Issues and De-velopment of Sciences, 372–377. Cambridge, UK. https://doi.org/10.36074/logos-20.05.2022.110

Xu, B. (2025). Simulation and planning regulation of rural landscape patterns in suburbs of large cities: Based on the ESP-GMOP-PLUS coupled model. Ecological Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecofro.2025.06.010

Samoilenko, Ye. V. (2021). Methods of structural and planning renovation of riverside urban territo-ries. Ukrainian Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 3, 89–94. https://doi.org/10.30838/J.BPSACEA.2312.230221.90.722

Lü, D., Lü, Y., Gao, G., Sun, S., Wang, Y., & Fu, B. (2024). A landscape persistence-based methodologi-cal framework for assessing ecological stability. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 17, 100300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2023.100300

Fernandes, C. O. (2025). Greening urban landscapes: A systematic literature review of planting design for resilient and livable cities. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128793

Тsaryk, L. P., & Kuzyk, I. R. (2020). Geoecological assessment of the land use structure of the Ternopil city united territorial community. Visnyk of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series Ecology, 23, 30–40. https://doi.org/10.26565/1992-4259-2020-23-03

Russo, L. F., Andrello, M., Giuliani, M., Ancillotto, L., Carboni, M., La Bella, G., Martelli, F., & Santini, L. (2025). Mapping the urban landscape at multiple ecological scales. Urban Forestry & Urban Green-ing, 107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128849

Nguyen, T. V. H., Tran, T. H., Pham, M. Q., Le, D. H., Nguyen, V. H., & Luu, Q. D. (2025). Assessing the proportions of economic values in the Trang An Scenic Landscape complex using an improved fuzzy AHP approach. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.100751

Liu, M., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Exploring common spatial characteristics to integrate ecological and visu-al landscape qualities: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2025.129007

Korpilo, S., Hasanzadeh, K., Klein, R., Willberg, E., Taylor, R., Müürisepp, K., Olafsson, A. S., & Toivo-nen, T. (2025). Green and blue spaces matter for active mobility: Results from mapping perceived envi-ronmental exposure in five European cities. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2025.129088

Nazariuk, M. M., Polianskyi, Y. S., & Ostroushko, M. V. (2022). Realities and prospects for the devel-opment of urbosystems in Lviv city. Liudyna ta Dovkillya: Problems of Neoecology, 37, 6–21. https://doi.org/10.26565/1992-4224-2022-37-01

Masruchiyah, N., Damayanti, N., Santoso, P. Y., & Marfu, A. (2025). Harnessing green human capital and circular economy in urbanization: Advancing water resilience through resource conservation and green technology. Environmental Challenges, 20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2025.101227

Beladi, H., Chao, C.-C., Trinh, C. T., & Ee, M. S. (2025). Green financing for ESG investments and wag-es in a sustainable economy. International Review of Financial Analysis, 106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104569

Published
2025-12-27
How to Cite
Kushniruk, T. M., Petryshche, O. I., & Dodurych, V. V. (2025). Taxonomic characteristics of landscape and recreational framework in the system of ecological urban planning. Visnyk of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series Еcоlogy, (33), 107-120. https://doi.org/10.26565/1992-4259-2025-33-08