The Influence of Tax Rates for the Groundwater Extraction to the Ecological Status of Water Bodies in the EU Countries

  • O. S. Liubchyk Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Keywords: ecology, water objects, groundwater, rent payments, budget allocations, groundwater extraction, EU, WFD

Abstract

Purpose. To analyze the relationship between the ecological status of water bodies and the size of the tax rate for groundwater extraction. Methods. A complex of general scientific methods of research was used. In particular, a comparative analysis of the level of tax rates for the extraction of groundwater in the EU member states. Results. A comparative analysis of the level of tax rates for groundwater extraction in the EU member states has been made.The issue of allocating state income from rent payments for groundwater extraction has been investigated. It has been established that the cost of rent payments from groundwater extraction is usually attributed to: general taxation (Denmark, the Netherlands, Germany), water resources management (France), fund for the protection and restoration of groundwater (Belgium, Germany), expenditure on water resources (provinces in the Netherlands, Australia).The modern ecological status of water objects of EU countries has been studied. It has been established that rent payments for groundwater extraction in the EU member states vary considerably. The smallest are observed in the post-Soviet area (Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania). The highest tax, among the countries under study, in Denmark. Denmark is leading the quality indicators of underground and surface waters. 70-90% of water bodies in Denmark have a good ecological status.Conclusions.It has been practically proved that the high tax rate for the extraction of groundwater does not solve environmental problems. The experience of European countries shows that the improvement of the ecological status of water objects is possible by budget allocations from the extraction of groundwater to the management and protection of water resources.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kozlova, N. V. (2007). Methodological aspects of the economic assessment of water as a natural resource. Proceedings of Tomsk Polytechnic University. Engineering of geo-resources. 111–115 p.[in Ukraine]

Savchuk, O., (2016). General characteristics of the regulation of the use and extraction of groundwater by landowners and land users on the basis of the laws of different states. European Information and Research Center. Available at: http://euinfocenter.rada.gov.ua/uploads/documents/28915.pdf

Liubchik, O. S. (2016). Adaptation of the Ukrainian legislation to the European in the direction of conducting monitoring of groundwater. Problems of theoretical and applied mineralogy, geology, methology of mining-extractive territories. Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, Kryvyi Rih: Publishing Center of Krivoy Rog National University. 120-125.[in Ukraine]

Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC (2000). European Communities, Official Journal of the European Communitie, Luxembourg, – 72 (1-21)[in English]

Groundwater Directive 2006/118/EC (2008). Access to European Union law EUR-Lex. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:02006L0118-20140711 [in English]

Golub, A. A., Strukova, E. B. (1998). Economics of nature management. Moscow, – 280 p.[in Russia]

Water Abstraction Taxes/Charges. ECOTEC in association with CESAM, CLM, University of Gothenburg, UCD and IEEP (CR) Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/enveco/taxation/pdf/ch6water_abstraction.pdf [in English]

Mattheiss, V., Goral, F., Volz, P. (2010). Economic instruments for mobilising financial resources for supporting IWRM , ACTeon. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/env/resources/46228724.pdf.

Pricing Water Resources and Water and Sanitation Services (2010). OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operetion and Development), Paris, France[in France]

Market based instruments for environmental policy in Europe (2005). European Environmental Agency, Technical report Copenhagen, Denmark, 2005. – 158 р. [in English]

Waterwet (2009) De wegwijzer naar informatie en diensten van alle overheden "Overheid". Available at: http://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0025458/2013-01-01.

Report on Water Management in the Slovak Republic (2006). Water Research Institute Bratislava. Available at: http://www.vuvh.sk/download/dok/ms06_en.pdf [in English]

Prawo wodne. Ustawa z dnia 18 lipca 2001 r. (2017). Baza Internetowy System Aktów Prawnych. Available at: http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/DetailsServlet?id=WDU20011151229 [in Polish]

Prawo ochrony środowiska. Ustawa z dnia 27 kwietnia 2001 r. (2017). Baza Internetowy System Aktów Prawnych. Available at: http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/DetailsServlet?id=WDU20010620627 [in Polish]

Zakon № 2006-1772(2006). French law Available at: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000000649171[in Russia]

Federal Water Law of Germany, (2009). Service of the Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection.Available at: http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/whg_2009/WHG.pdf [in Ukraine]

Guidelines for groundwater in Hungary, (2006). Ministry of Environment and Water. Available at: http://www.kvvm.hu/szakmai/karmentes/kiadvanyok/fav2/fav2_eng.pdf [in English]

The Tax Code of Ukraine. (2017). Legislation of Ukraine. The official website of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2755-17 [in Ukrainian].

Freshwater quality (2016). European Environmental Agency. Available at: https://www.eea.europa.eu/soer-2015/europe/freshwater [in English]

Strosser, P., Speck, S., (2004). Environmental taxes and charges in the water sector, a review of European experiences. Final report of a study for the Water Agency of Catalonia, Spain. [in English]

Published
2018-06-27
How to Cite
Liubchyk, O. S. (2018). The Influence of Tax Rates for the Groundwater Extraction to the Ecological Status of Water Bodies in the EU Countries. Visnyk of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University Series «Еcоlogy», (18), 115-122. https://doi.org/10.26565/1992-4259-2018-18-12