Post-communist transit of Ukraine (on the example of the evolution of the People's Movement of Ukraine)

Keywords: People's Movement of Ukraine, independence of Ukraine, post-communist transit

Abstract

The article reveals the evolution of the People's Movement of Ukraine from the most influential socio-political organization of the initial stage of independent state formation in Ukraine to a marginal political party. The complex, nonlinear and contradictory trajectory of post-communist transit demonstrated by Ukraine in the post-Soviet space, the presence of clear reversals on the path to democratization of our country necessitate analysis of the genesis of the new national liberation movement and the main factors that led to independence and rejection of pro-communist concept. There are two main stages in the history of the NRU: 1) from its founding in 1989 to the adoption of the Constitution in 1996 - active political activity, great influence on the state-building process; 2) since 1996 - a decline in activity and loss of influence on major political processes. In general, the People's Movement of Ukraine has become a compromise formula for the formation of an organized people's opposition for the CPU. The People’s Movement of Ukraine as a mass anti-communist and anti-imperial subject in the second largest Soviet republic is undoubtedly the main driving force behind the revolutionary events at the turn of the 1980s and 1990s in the former USSR. The foreign policy factor is manifested in the fact that the second largest Ukrainian nation in the USSR, after a long historical period, declared its right to political self-determination through the construction of its own sovereign nation-state, which detonated the Soviet Union.
The main historical result of the NRU’s activities as a mass public association was the proclamation of Ukraine’s state independence, but it failed to become a democratic party in power under the new historical conditions. At the present stage, the People's Movement of Ukraine has become a national-conservative party that has little influence on modern political processes in Ukraine.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baranovska, N. 2010. Suspilno-politychni ta sotsialno-ekonomichni peredumovy vynyknennia Rukhu. [Socio-political and socio-economic preconditions for the emergence of the Movement]. In Narodnyi Rukh Ukrainy: istoriia, ideolohiia ta politychna evoliutsiia (1989-2009): Proceedings of the kruhloho stolu, prysviachenoho 20-i richnytsi stvorennia Narodnoho Rukhu Ukrainy za perebu- dovu. Kyiv, 22 veresnia 2009. Kyiv: Instytut istorii Ukrainy NAN Ukrainy, s.13-28. [in Ukrainian]
Blan, E. 2009. Rodom iz KHB. Systema Putina. [Originally from the KGB. Putin’s system]. Kyiv: Tempora, 360 s. [in Ukrainian]
Boyko, O. 1996. Ukraina 1991-1995 rr.: tini mynuloho chy kontury maibutnoho? [Ukraine 1991- 1995: shadows of the past or contours of the future?] Kyiv: Abrys, 207 s.[in Ukrainian]
Chyhrinov, V.I. & Polishchuk, I.O. (2006). Derzhavotvorcha tradytsiia Ukrainy: polityko- kulturnyi vymir. [The state-building tradition of Ukraine: a political and cultural dimension]. Kharkiv: KhIBM, 380 s. [in Ukrainian]
Derevinskyi, V. 2010. Transformatsiia NRU z hromadsko-politychnoi orhanizatsii v politychnu partiiu. [Transformation of the NRU from a public-political organization into a political party]. In Narodnyi Rukh Ukrainy: istoriia, ideolohiia ta politychna evoliutsiia (1989-2009): Proceedings of the kruhloho stolu, prysviachenoho 20-i richnytsi stvorennia Narodnoho Rukhu Ukrainy za perebu- dovu. Kyiv, 22 veresnia 2009. Kyiv: Instytut istorii Ukrainy NAN Ukrainy, s. 29-38. [in Ukrainian]
Hay-Nyzhnyk, P. 2012. Narodnyi Rukh Ukrainy. In Ukrainska bahatopartiinist: politychni partii, vyborchi bloky, lidery (kinets 1980-kh – pochatok 2012 rr.) [The People’s Movement of Ukraine. Ukrainian multiparty politics: political parties, electoral blocs, leaders (late 1980s – early 2012)]. Entsyklopedychnyi dovidnyk. Kyiv: IPiEND im. I.F. Kurasa NAN Ukrainy, s.274-280. [in Ukrainian]
Haran, O. V. 1993. Ubyty drakona (Z istorii Rukhu ta novykh partii Ukrainy). [Kill the Dragon (From the History of the Movement and New Parties of Ukraine) ] Kyiv: Lybid, 200 s. [in Ukrainian]
Honcharuk, H. I. 1997. Narodnyi Rukh Ukrainy. Istoriya. [The People’s Movement of Ukraine. History]. Odesa: Astroprynt, 300 s. [in Ukrainian]
Kalynovskyi, Yu.Yu. 2016. Natsionalna ideia yak tsinnisna determinanta derzhavotvorchoho protsesu v Ukraini. [The national idea as a value determinant of the state-making process in Ukraine]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu «Yurydychna akademiia Ukrainy imeni Yarolava Mudroho». Ser.: Filosofiia, issue 1 (28), s. 98-105. [in Ukrainian]
Kaspruk, V. 2009. Chomu Rukh tak i ne stav providnoiu politychnoiu syloiu Ukraini? [Why has the Rukh not become a leading political force in Ukraine?]. Radio Svoboda. Retrieved from https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/1818227.html (Date of the application 14.08.2020). [in Ukrainian]
Kormych, L. I., Shelest, D.S. 2004. Hromadski obiednannia ta politychni partii suchasnoi Ukrainy. [Public Associations and Political Parties of Modern Ukraine]. Kyiv: Avrio, 261s. [in Ukrainian]
Korotkov, D. S. 2012. Politychna elita Ukrainy: stanovlennia i rozvytok u vyborchomu protsesi Ukrainy. [The Political Elite of Ukraine: Formation and Development in the Electoral Process of Ukraine]. Kharkiv: Vyd-vo KhNEU, 208 s. [in Ukrainian]
Kravchuk, O. 2009. Zlet i zanepad Rukhu: plany, rezultaty ta uroky. [The Rise and Decline of the Movement: Plans, Outcomes and Lessons]. Universum, issue 5-6 (187-188), s. 57-69. [in Ukrainian]
Kukuruz, O. V. 2010. Politychna opozytsiia v Ukraini ta Polshchi: porivnialnyi analiz. [Political opposition in Ukraine and Poland: a comparative analysis]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 199 s. [in Ukrainian]
Lavrynovych, O. (Den.7 August 2018,). Yak «Rukh» vidmovyvsia staty partiieiu vlady. [How the Rukh refused to become a party o power]. Retrieved from https://day.kyiv.ua/uk/article/polityka/yak-ruh-vidmovyvsya-staty-partiyeyu-vlady [in Ukrainian]
Lytvyn, V.M. 1994. Politychna arena Ukrainy: diiovi osoby ta vykonavtsi. [The political arena of Ukraine: actors and performers]. Kyiv: Abrys, 495 s. [in Ukrainian]
Lytvyn, V.M., Smolii, V.A. & Levenets, Yu.A. 2007. Ukraina: politychna istoriia. XX – pocha- tok XXI st. [Ukraine: A Political History. XX – beginning of XXI century]. Kyiv: Parlamentske vyd-vo, 798 s. [in Ukrainian]
Patnam, R.D., Leonardi, R. & Nanetti, R.Y. 2001. Tvorennia demokratii: tradytsii hromadi- anskoi aktyvnosti v suchasnii Italii. [Creating Democracy: Traditions of Civic Engagement in Modern Italy]. Kyiv: Vydavnytstvo Solomii Pavlychko «Osnovy», 302 s. [in Ukrainian]
Pustovit, S. 2010. Narolnyi Rukh: problema vynyknennia. [The People’s Movement of Ukraine: The Problem of Emergence]. Retrieved from https://www.oldconf.neasmo.org.ua/node/35 (Date of the application 19.11.2020). [in Ukrainian]
Riabokon, A. (2014, October 1). Narodnyi Rukh Ukrainy – istoriia, chy perspektyva? [The People’s Movement of Ukraine – History, or Perspective?] Trudova slava, 2014, 1 October. [in Ukrainian]
Statut NRU. 1989. URL: https://mnru.com.ua/pro-nas/statut-nru [in Ukrainian]
Shveda, Yu.R. 2005. Politychni partii: Entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk. [Political Parties: An Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Lviv: Astroliabiia, 488 s. [in Ukrainian]
Published
2021-11-01
How to Cite
Polishchuk, I. (2021). Post-communist transit of Ukraine (on the example of the evolution of the People’s Movement of Ukraine). Drinovsky Sbornik, 14. https://doi.org/10.7546/DS.2021.14.17
Section
Статті