Basic principles of confocal microscopy of cаlcium signals

  • V. M. Shkryl Bogomoletz Institute of Physiology National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Keywords: Са2, fluorescent method, fluorescent dye, confocal microscopy

Abstract

Background: The study of fast processes occurring in living cells, for example, the dynamics of calcium ions or other ions, is actual for modern biophysics, physiology and medicine and can be carried out by laser scanning confocal microscopy. Confocal microscopy as a method of studying biological objects has a number of features requiring an understanding of the delicate mechanisms underlying it.

Objectives: The aim of the work is the description of principles and details of measurements of calcium signals in the living cells using laser scanning confocal microscopy and fluorescent indicators.

Materials and methods: The analysis of the methodological and practical aspects of studies of calcium signals was carried out by confocal microscopy in the work.

Results: Confocal microscopy allows to study the changes in the concentration of free calcium within the cell and even a small part of it by a fluorescent dye, which increases the contrast in comparison with conventional fluorescence microscopy through an additional confocal aperture located in the front of the detector and the use of laser light source and scanning the object. To register calcium signals it is necessary to make a selection of a number of adequate parameters: the registration frequency, the size of a single scanning element (pixel), the sensitivity of the detector, the intensity of laser irradiation, the diameter of the confocal gap, the corresponding filters for exciting and emitting the fluorescent dye used and the corresponding dichroic mirror. An important stage of a setup of a confocal system is the determination of the value of the scattering function of a point. Compensation of the process of bleaching of the fluorescence dye and reduction of phototoxicity, minimization of the scattering process of the image allow to increase a reproducibility of the experiments.

Conclusions: Using modern laser scanning confocal microscopes for registration of calcium signals from a small group of channels (for example, rianodine receptors) or the cell part, it is necessary to carefully select the parameters of the hardware setup, which are determined by the nature of the object of study and the peculiarities of the experimental conditions. This will allow to receive the reliable information about the functioning of both individual channels and the mechanisms of Ca2+ signaling of the whole cell or its part.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

V. M. Shkryl, Bogomoletz Institute of Physiology National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

4 Bogomoletz Str., Kyiv, Ukraine

References

1. Rochefort, N. L., Jia, H., & Konnerth, A. (2008). Calcium imaging in the living brain: prospects for molecular medicine. Trends Mol Med, 14(9), 389-399. doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2008.07.005

2. Russell, J. T. (2011). Imaging calcium signals in vivo: a powerful tool in physiology and pharmacology. Br J Pharmacol, 163(8), 1605-1625. doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00988.x

3. Takahashi, A., Camacho, P., Lechleiter, J. D., & Herman, B. (1999). Measurement of intracellular calcium. Physiol Rev, 79(4), 1089-1125.

4. Jablonski, A. (1933). Efficiency of Anti-Stokes Fluorescence in Dyes. Nature, 131, 839-840. doi:10.1038/131839b0

5. Lichtman, J. W., & Conchello, J. A. (2005). Fluorescence microscopy. Nature Methods, 2(12), 910-919. doi:10.1038/nmeth817

6. Yuste, R. (2005). Fluorescence microscopy today. Nature Methods, 2(12), 902-904. doi:10.1038/nmeth1205-902

7. Minsky M. (1961). Microscopy Apparatus: U.S. Patent #3013467A; filed Nov 7, 1957; granted Dec 19, 1961.

8. Bootman, M. D., Rietdorf, K., Collins, T., Walker, S., & Sanderson, M. (2013). Ca2+-sensitive fluorescent dyes and intracellular Ca2+ imaging. Cold Spring Harb Protoc, 2013(2), 83-99. doi:10.1101/pdb.top066050

9. Tsien, R. Y. (1980). New calcium indicators and buffers with high selectivity against magnesium and protons: design, synthesis, and properties of prototype structures. Biochemistry, 19(11), 2396-2404.

10. Figueroa, L., Shkryl, V. M., Blatter, L. A., & Rios, E. (2013). Using two dyes with the same fluorophore to monitor cellular calcium concentration in an extended range. PLoS One, 8(2), e55778. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055778

11. Isaeva, E. V., Shkryl, V. M., & Shirokova, N. (2005). Mitochondrial redox state and Ca2+ sparks in permeabilized mammalian skeletal muscle. J Physiol, 565(Pt 3), 855-872. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2005.086280

12. Shkryl, V. M., & Shirokova, N. (2006). Transfer and tunneling of Ca2+ from sarcoplasmic reticulum to mitochondria in skeletal muscle. J Biol Chem, 281(3), 1547-1554. doi:10.1074/jbc.M505024200

13. Shkryl, V. M., & Blatter, L. A. (2013). Ca(2+) release events in cardiac myocytes up close: insights from fast confocal imaging. PLoS One, 8(4), e61525. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061525

14. Cheng, H., Lederer, W. J., & Cannell, M. B. (1993). Calcium sparks: elementary events underlying excitation-contraction coupling in heart muscle. Science, 262(5134), 740-744.

15. Rios, E., Stern, M. D., Gonzalez, A., Pizarro, G., & Shirokova, N. (1999). Calcium release flux underlying Ca2+ sparks of frog skeletal muscle. J Gen Physiol, 114(1), 31-48.

16. Shkryl, V. M., Blatter, L. A., & Rios, E. (2012). Properties of Ca2+ sparks revealed by four-dimensional confocal imaging of cardiac muscle. J Gen Physiol, 139(3), 189-207. doi:10.1085/jgp.201110709

17. Blatter, L. A., Kockskamper, J., Sheehan, K. A., Zima, A. V., Huser, J., & Lipsius, S. L. (2003). Local calcium gradients during excitation-contraction coupling and alternans in atrial myocytes. J Physiol, 546(Pt 1), 19-31.

18. Shtejn G.I. (2007). Rukovodstvo po konfokal'noj mikroskopiiI. (рр 19-21). INC RAN Sankt-Peterburg.

19. Agard, D. A., Hiraoka, Y., Shaw, P., & Sedat, J. W. (1989). Fluorescence microscopy in three dimensions. Methods Cell Biol, 30, 353-377.

20. Holmes F.J., O'Connor N.J. (2000). Blind deconvolution of 3D transmitted light brightfield micrographs. J Microsc., V. 200 (Pt2), 114-127.

21. Shaw, P. J., & Rawlins, D. J. (1991). Three-dimensional fluorescence microscopy. Prog Biophys Mol Biol, 56(3), 187-213.

22. Holmes, T. J., & Liu, Y. H. (1989). Richardson-Lucy/maximum likelihood image restoration algorithm for fluorescence microscopy: further testing. Appl Opt, 28(22), 4930-4938. doi:10.1364/ao.28.004930

23. Agard, D. A. (1984). Optical sectioning microscopy: cellular architecture in three dimensions. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng, 13, 191-219. doi:10.1146/annurev.bb.13.060184.001203

24. Soeller, C., & Cannell, M. B. (2002). Estimation of the sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ release flux underlying Ca2+ sparks. Biophys J, 82(5), 2396-2414. doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(02)75584-7
Published
2017-12-21
Cited
How to Cite
Shkryl, V. M. (2017). Basic principles of confocal microscopy of cаlcium signals. Biophysical Bulletin, 2(38), 20-34. https://doi.org/10.26565/2075-3810-2017-38-03
Section
Methods of biophysical investigations