OBLIGATIONS OF SOLIDARITY OF SUBJECTS OF FORMATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF FAMILY POLICY
Abstract
The article reveals the essence of the joint responsibility of the subjects of the formation and implementation of family policy, which, according to the author of the article, means the joint responsibility of the participants in the interaction process – the family, the state and society for mutually acceptable decisions in family policy.
Joint and separate fulfillment of obligations provides for: a) indivisibility of the subject of actions; b) a clear division of responsibility between the parties to the obligation; с) joint responsibility of participants in the interaction process for joint decisions in the formation and implementation of family policy.
The peculiarity of joint and separate obligations between the subjects of the formation and implementation of family policy is that the state (public) has the right to demand from any family member or from the family as a whole to fulfill the obligation. At the same time, family members alone or one of the family members can demand from the state, the public or from them together, high-quality and complete services. Such obligatory relations between the subjects of the formation and implementation of family policy are subdivided into “direct relations” and “regressive relations”.
“Direct relationship” involves the interaction of the subjects of the formation and implementation of family policy. Each subject of the formation and implementation of family policy has the right to demand.
The nature of “regressive relations” in solidary and separate obligations arises when one of the subjects of the formation and implementation of family policy applies to one of the family members in full. The fulfillment of the obligation by a family member completely terminates the obligations of the other joint beneficiaries to the service provider. At the same time, a family member who has solved a problem for everyone becomes a service provider for other family members who must fulfill their personal duty in the form of seeking help.
However, these and other services are not provided in a coordinated manner. To solve this problem, the article proposes a comprehensive national electronic database of the “Family Service” type, which will receive information from various official sources.
Downloads
References
Systemni chynnyky vzajemodii polityky i upravlinnja [Systemic factors interaction policy and management]. (2010).V.A. Rebkalo, V.A. Shakhov (Eds.). Kyiv: NADU [in Ukrainian].
Goshovsky, V., Antonova, E. (2013). Kontseptualni umovy orhanizatsii vzaiemodii Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy z neuriadovymy orhanizatsiiamy. Countries and regions, vol. 2 (42), 48–53.
Osnovy demokratii [Fundamentals of democracy]. (2009). A.F. Kolodiy (Ed). Lviv: Astroliabiia [in Ukrainian].
Kruty, O.M. (2010). Kontseptualna model dialohovoi vzaiemodii orhaniv derzhavnoi vlady ta instytutiv hromadianskoho suspilstva. Theoretical and applied issues of state formation. URL: http // www.nbuv.gov.ua/e-journals/tppd/index.htm [in Ukrainian].
Kovalchuk, L. (2010). Vzaiemodiia orhaniv derzhavnoi vlady i hromadskykh orhanizatsij u vyrishenni problem simi. Bulletin of the Ministry of Ukraine for Family, Youth and Sports, 1–2, 23–25 [in Ukrainian].
Kryzhanivska, O.P., Maletych, G.A. (2011). Sotsialna ta simejna polityka v suchasnij Ukraini: teoretychni ta praktychni aspekty ii rozvytku. Bulletin of NTUU “KPI”, 3 (11), 60–63 [in Ukrainian].
Creamer, B.A. (2010). Semejnaia polytyka v Ukrayne. Demoskop Weekly. URL: http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/2010/0405/analit02.php [in Ukrainian].
Pasko, Ya.I. (2008). Sotsialna derzhava i hromadianske suspilstvo: spivpratsia versus protystoiannia. Kyiv: PARAPAN [in Ukrainian].
Romovska, Z. (2001). Za nedavnikh radianskykh chasiv mitsnist simi trymalasia na prymusi. Power and politics, 1, 9 [in Ukrainian].
Chekhovska, I.V. (2011). Spivvidnoshennia sotsialnoi i simejnoi polityky: deiaki teoretychni i praktychni aspekty. Law and Management, 1, 465–474 [in Ukrainian].
Konstytutsiia Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 28.06.1996 r. No. 254k/96-VR. (1996). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 30, art. 141.
Pro zatverdzhennia Metodychnykh rekomendatsij schodo nadannia hromadianam sotsialnoi pidtrymky za pryntsypom “iedynoho vikna” ta vyiznoi roboty “mobilnoho sotsialnoho ofisu”: nakaz Ministerstvo sotsialnoi polityky Ukrainy vid 14.03.2012 r. No. 137.(2012) URL: http://consultant.parus.ua.
Official website of the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine. URL: http://sfs.gov.ua/.
Official website of the Ministry of Social Policy of Ukraine. URL: https://www.msp.gov.ua/.
Official website of the Service Canada. URL: https://www.canada.ca/en/employmentsocial-development/corporate/portfolio.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
